(what's this?)
Home
Discussion Forum
Blog
Galleries
Pamphlets
Headline Archive
Video Archive
Audio Archive
Document Archive
Charts
Timelines
POAC counter- spin
Buzzwords
Daily Email Newsletter
Postal newsletter
Links
POAC Store
Recommended Books
Donate
Contact
POAC Myspace 
You can have POAC headlines emailed to you every day free of charge. Subscribe here
 

Paper or plastic? NO! Earth-friendly reinforced canvas grocery totes now available in the POAC store
 
If you are presently serving in the military or in the Delayed Enlistment Program and beginning to rethink your participation, here are resources to help you.
 
Your ad here: $50/week or $150/month Click for details
 

 Contributing Columnists

Tj Templeton
Jack Dalton
Anwaar Hussain
Doris Colmes
Crisis Papers
Vincent L Guarisco
W. David Jenkins III
Dr. Steven Jonas
Lucinda Marshall
Jason Miller
Andrew Wahl
Rowan Wolf
Reader Submissions
 

POAC merchandise:

T-shirts, fleece, tank-tops, prints, magnets and more...

 

Must-see Selections

 
14 points of fascism
 
Sept. 11: They Let it happen 
 
A brief history of the PNAC: a refresher 
 
Bush Cronyism
 
Catapulting the propaganda: The Rendon group
The office of special plans
The Whitehouse Iraq Group
 
 

POAC ENDORSED: The 15% Solution: A Political History of American Fascism, 2001 to 2022 
 

F r o m   t h e Archives

National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive makes Bush dictator in event of a terrorist attack or disaster
 
Former Reagan official says "something's in the works" to trigger a police state (Held over)
 
Whitehouse denies member of the Homeland Security Committee right to examine plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.
 
Iran-contra all over again. (Video) "Explosive" new Hersh scoop: Bush funneling money to Al Qaeda-related groups
 
Must see: What happens at Facebook.com does not stay at Facebook.com
 
Dateline 2002: "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq..."
 
 
 

 

 

Man accused of killing mother in drug dispute  

It was originally stated he killed her over pot. Now the truth is that he was on a physc drug

 

After reading this story “Man accused of killing mother in drug dispute” by the Associated Press (AP) published in Tuesday’s (1/2/05) Chronicle, I wondered if there might be more to the story than the AP let on.  Being a skeptical person I searched the internet for more information on this story. 

 

The article quotes the sheriff, Lupe Trevino, saying "He was mad at his mom because his mom flushed his drugs (down the toilet)." According to the McAllen Monitor ( link ), the rest of the quote is "It was the straw that broke his camel’s back." The quote seems to indicate that the police believe there is more to this than just a young man angry at his mother for flushing his drugs.  The AP also left out that this young man had an extensive criminal record, quoting from the McAllen Monitor again,  the young man had “outstanding warrants for his arrests — two for revocation of probation, one for an aggravated robbery and another for a misdemeanor theft.” 

 

Lying by omission is deliberate omission of necessary information for understanding. This causes confusion and erroneous conclusions.    I don’t know if this was deliberate lying but if it wasn’t it is lazy journalism.   The young man’s criminal history is public record and is easily checked.  Since the first part of the quote in both articles is word for word the same, I have a tendency to believe that the last part of the quote was deliberately left off. 

 

The AP is also engaging in headline manipulation.  The headline “Man accused of killing mother in drug dispute” tends to make the reader think the mother and son were both engaged in some kind of drug deal gone bad.  “24-year-old confesses to murdering his mother” leads the reader to no such assumption. 

So why so much difference in the stories?  If the AP was doing a service to the public the story would have been pretty much the same in both versions.   Which brings me to wonder, is the AP is accepting money from the United States Justice Department to sensationalize drugs stories to make people afraid and bolster the opinion of the drug war?  I wouldn’t be surprised as the recent stories about Armstrong Williams, Maggie Gallagher, and others show that some journalists and  government are often quick to throw out their ethics and lie to the public.

 

Tammera Halphen

 

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please review Title 17, Sec. 107 of the U.S. Code. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

privacy policy

© 2002- 2006  OLDAmericanCentury.org and OLDAmericanCentury.com