(what's this?)
Home
Discussion Forum
Blog
Galleries
Pamphlets
Headline Archive
Video Archive
Audio Archive
Document Archive
Charts
Timelines
POAC counter- spin
Buzzwords
Daily Email Newsletter
Postal newsletter
Links
POAC Store
Recommended Books
Donate
Contact
POAC Myspace 
You can have POAC headlines emailed to you every day free of charge. Subscribe here
 

 

Paper or plastic? NO! Earth-friendly reinforced canvas grocery totes now available in the POAC store
 
If you are presently serving in the military or in the Delayed Enlistment Program and beginning to rethink your participation, here are resources to help you.
 
Your ad here: $50/week or $150/month Click for details
 

 Contributing Columnists

Tj Templeton
Jack Dalton
Anwaar Hussain
Doris Colmes
Crisis Papers
Vincent L Guarisco
W. David Jenkins III
Dr. Steven Jonas
Lucinda Marshall
Jason Miller
Andrew Wahl
Rowan Wolf
Reader Submissions
 

POAC merchandise:

T-shirts, fleece, tank-tops, prints, magnets and more...

 

Must-see Selections

 
14 points of fascism
 
Sept. 11: They Let it happen 
 
A brief history of the PNAC: a refresher 
 
Bush Cronyism
 
Catapulting the propaganda: The Rendon group
The office of special plans
The Whitehouse Iraq Group
 
 

POAC ENDORSED: The 15% Solution: A Political History of American Fascism, 2001 to 2022 
 

F r o m   t h e Archives

National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive makes Bush dictator in event of a terrorist attack or disaster
 
Former Reagan official says "something's in the works" to trigger a police state (Held over)
 
Whitehouse denies member of the Homeland Security Committee right to examine plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.
 
Iran-contra all over again. (Video) "Explosive" new Hersh scoop: Bush funneling money to Al Qaeda-related groups
 
Must see: What happens at Facebook.com does not stay at Facebook.com
 
Dateline 2002: "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq..."
 
 
 

 

China Moves To Take Over Unocal
By Rowan Wolf

 

The China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) has made its bid to take over Unocal. The move is seen as symbolic of China's exploding economy and influence, but it is also a more direct statement of a larger competition between the U.S. and China. Chevron (top bidder before CNOOC's offer), is letting it's lower bid of $16.5 billion stand. Perhaps this is because Chevron expects the Congress to block CNOOC's take over attempt.

This is big news, and not particularly good news, if you have been watching the evolving situation between China and the United States. It is clear that the two nations are on a collision course in a number of ways. China is a primary labor source for US transnational corporations and a major exporter to the United States. China is also a major importer of U.S. agricultural products. Then add in that China is one of the major holders of U.S. debt, and that the U.S. continues to push that debt higher needing China to fund the excess. Then add in that China's industrial and economic growth is making it a head on competitor for natural resources - notably oil - with the world's largest consumer ... the United States.

Over the last year, there has been an acceleration of negativity between the two. There have been calls for China to manipulate its currency to the benefit of the U.S., and arguments over textiles and other issues. There have been many reasons to not push China too hard, but the U.S. also needs China's influence in the ongoing non-negotiation with North Korea.

In short, China has the U.S. over a number of barrels, and is now in a position to fight at a level the U.S. hasn't had to deal with in a very long time (at least since World War II). Therefore it is not surprising that both the Federal Reserve Chairman and the US Treasury Secretary (Greenspan and Snow respectively) are warning the "Senate Finance Committee against punitive legislation that could trigger a trade war and ultimately harm the U.S. economy" (Washington Post).

On the other hand, there are potentially massive implications of China's state owned oil company owning one of the largest U.S. oil companies. Is China throwing down the economic gauntlet, or is it creating a major bargaining chip? It seems clear to me that China has the upper hand on the U.S. - particularly now that China is also a member of the World Trade Organization. Should the U.S. try to place punitive tariffs on China, it is certain to file an appeal and win. Given transnational corporations (such as Wal-Mart) are heavily invested in China, and the big U.S. motor companies (among others) want unfettered access to China's consumers (and cheap labor), pressure on those corporations is also likely to not gain much corporate support. They see a massive profit and likely have no desire to jeopardize it.

However, CNOOC's acquisition of Unocal would also make China a major player in other global affairs and the control of oil and gas. For example, Unocal has been a big (and long term) player in Southern Asia and the Middle East. In fact, Afghanistan's President is an ex-Unocal consultant, and now there are gas pipelines in play - in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Unocal (and others) have been a major reason for U.S. "intervention" in the area (funding and training those who became Al Qaeda in the Russian - Afghanistan War for example). To have China as a major corporate player in these intrigues is a mind boggling thought.

So is the Chinese bid a move toward major control and input in the resource affairs of the U.S. (and other "western" nations), or is it something they can offer to give up for other "concessions?" It depends on how "unfriendly" they want the conflict to be - and the conflict will continue. Chinese control of Unocal would truly make China a global player in the oil wars. I'm not sure that's a "chip" they would want to bargain with.

Other News On This Topic
6/24/05 CNNMoney, Unocal to talk with Chinese bidder soon

6/24/05 China View, Oil expert urges US government not to interfere with CNOOC's deal

6/24/05 People's Daily Online (China), What's the chance of CNOOC's successful bidding for Unocal?

6/24/05 Tokyo Market Watch, CNOOC aims to ease Unocal concerns

6/23/05 Forbes, CNOOC using cash, loans in Unocal bid; Goldman/JPMorgan offer bridge - UPDATE

6/23/05 MarketWatch, Goldman goes 'unsolicited' - Investment bank and J.P. Morgan would provide financing

6/23/05 TimesAsia, The Energy Game - A Chinese oil company is thinking of bidding for a U.S. one. Does that make sense?


Rowan Wolf is a columnist for Project for the Old American Century,
 and the editor of Uncommon Thought Journal. 
Her email is [email protected]
 

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please review Title 17, Sec. 107 of the U.S. Code. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

privacy policy

© 2002- 2007  OLDAmericanCentury.org and OLDAmericanCentury.com