|
|
|
ANN COULTER: THE NEW FACE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY Steven Jonas, MD, MPH In
this column we take a bit of a breather from giving advice to the Democratic
Party. (I think that we shall return to that theme next week.) We
turn instead to talking about the Republican Party, its public face, and what it
truly stands for. (Actually, there are some lessons for the Democrats to
learn here, but they are indirect ones.) For the relationship between the
two is about to change. Among people like most of the readers of TPJ,
what it does truly stand for has been well known for quite some time:
corporatism; the expansion of authoritarian government vs. Constitutionally
guaranteed individual rights; an aggressive, militaristic foreign policy; the
rapid expansion of globalization and the export of US capital seeking
ever-higher profits; the shrinking to the maximum extent possible of those
functions of government that support the broad national interest; and most
recently using the national government to further the interests of the Christian
Right by subsidy and the use of the criminal law. However, until very
recently to the extent possible the Republican Party has kept as much of their
true agenda as possible in the shadows. Now
comes the latest book from the Far Right icon, Ann Coulter: Godless: The
Church of Liberalism. In typical Coulter style, it is filled with
rage. In fact a discussion of Ann Coulter's rage became all the rage on
the Left when the book came out a couple of months ago. Even Hillary Clinton
(hardly on the Left of anything) went after her for the remarks she made about
those 9/11 widows who have become strong critics of the Georgites on a variety
of fronts. Prominent is a group colloquially called the " Much
of the focus on Coulter's latest outburst has been on her rage and unadulterated
nastiness in regard of the 9/11 widows who have been and continue to be
outspoken opponents of Georgite policies. Whether she really thinks these things
or just says them so as to sell more books is beside the point. She prominently
puts them out there and many people focus on them. However, to my mind both the
remarks and the predictable outrage against them serve a purpose for Coulter
well beyond selling books. They distract from the book's central message, which
is of central importance to Coulter and her ilk within the Republican Party,
people like Mary Matalin (you know, the wife of "Democratic" pundit
and sometime political consultant James Carville) who defended Coulter without
qualification on NBC's "Imus in the Morning" on June 10, 2006. It is
that central message which is of the most import to her followers at the core of
the Republican Party’s electoral base and to which we should be paying the
most attention. Let
us recall, as the media critic Eric Alterman noted in talking with Sam Seder
sitting on for Al Franken on July 3, 2006, Karl Rove has openly said that what
mobilizes his base is anger. (Mobilizing fear he uses broadly, but it is
anger that resonates with his base’s base issues.) Nevertheless, until
now the Republican Party has done a good job of keeping its anger mobilization
off to the side, to the degree possible. Ann Coulter represents the coming
public, open face of the Republican Party, folks. Make no mistake about it. The
public Republican face will be contorted into anger, into rage, into fear, for
all to plainly see. No more Mr. Nice Guy or Ms. Nice Gal. Mark my
words. What
a sea-change there has been in the Republican Party over the past 50 years.
On Nov. 8, 1954, Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower famously said: "Should any
political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and
eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again
in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that
believes you can do these things. Among them are a few Unfortunately
that small number of (not-so) stupid people not only took over the Republican
Party but they drove the whole political landscape in the Beginning
with Goldwater, Eisenhower's "oil millionaires" moved in to the center
of the party, and married right-wing politics to their cause, with great
electoral success: Nixon and the racist "Southern Strategy" in 1968,
Reagan and the bows to both racism and the Christian Right in 1980, this Bush's
total embrace of the Christian Right in 2000. But still, outwardly the
Republican Party has managed to look somehow "normal," in the American
tradition, and certainly gentlemanly and ladylike for the most part, although
George W. and Dick C. have been starting to wear the veneer off that one. But
now comes Coulter. In
a previous book, Coulter labeled all "liberals" and other
non-supporters of Georgite policy as "traitors." The penalty for
treason is death. Now liberals are "godless." For the "goddish"
of the Coulter variety, as I previously said in this space, one deals with the
“godless” by force. If Coulter has her way, the "traitorous" and
"godless" "liberals" (as she defines them) would be going
perhaps to the camps, going perhaps before the firing squads, perhaps becoming
the targets of Death Squads (as advocated by the video game “Left Behind:
Eternal Forces,” developed from Tim LaHaye’s best-selling “Left Behind”
series, coming to a store near you this October just in time for Christmas),
perhaps burning to death at the stake, which is what militant Christian Churches
of a variety of stripes did to such persons who didn’t express their
“goddishness” in quite the right way over a period of hundreds of years into
the 17th century. In
this context it is interesting to note that what drives her is a version of what
she thinks "Christianity" is. (In the book’s cover photo, presumably
indicating her connection with Christianity, Coulter wears a black halter top
with a gold cross on her chest, the staff pointing directly at her cleavage.)
As she has said, "Although my Christianity is somewhat more explicit in
this book, Christianity fuels everything I write." Whatever else it is or
is not, Coulter's version of Christianity is surely militant. As for foreign
policy, remember when about the Muslim world she said: "We should invade
their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity"
(although given her version of Christianity one wonders why anyone would want to
convert)? As for domestic policy and how her version of
"Christianity" informs it, just consider the following quote:
"The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion
over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth,
be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet -- it's yours. That's our job:
drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big
gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars -- that's the Biblical
view." The
face of Ann Coulter: In no more than a few years, perhaps by 2008, all of the
Republican veneer will be gone, with Coulterian rage, total intolerance of
difference, rampant corporatism at center stage, and demonization of any
opposition at the center of the message. The message will clearly be backed up
by policy. And force, it is clear, is to be used against any and all opposition.
At least the target will be clear and clearly out in the open. It remains
to be seen whether the leadership of the Democratic Party will be able to bring
themselves to fire at it. ________________ Dr. Steven Jonas is a contributing author for The Political Junkies
(www.thepoliticaljunkies.net).
He is a
Professor of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY) and
author/co-author of over twenty books. Dr. Jonas is one of He is also the author of The 15% Solution: A Political
History of American Fascism, 2001-2022. Under the pseudonym
"Jonathan Westminster" this book was originally published in 1996.
It was republished with a New Introduction in 2004. Under Georgite rule,
the “fictional non-fiction” scenario of this work of “future history”
is, most unfortunately, becoming all too real, now almost day-by-day. The 2004 edition is available at www.barnesandnoble.com
(search with the book title) and www.xlibris.com
(click on “Bookstore,” then “Search” with the title). Both
versions are available at www.amazon.com
(go to "Books;" search with the title). Dr. Jonas is also a Contributing Editor
for the Weblog http://planetarymovement.org/blog/, produced by The Planetary
Movement Ltd. UK (http://planetarymovement.org/blog/), TPJ's own Michael
Carmichael, President and Chief Executive Officer, a Contributing
Columnist for the Project for the Old American Century, POAC (http://www.oldamericancentury.org/),
on which his TPJ columns appear regularly, and a Columnist for the webmagazine
BuzzFlash (http://www.buzzflash.com/) on
which short(er) articles are published once a week or so. By invitation, Dr.
J's TPJ columns are also posted periodically on the weblog Thomas Paine's
Corner (http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/).
2006 Jun
29, 2006 "Ideas
For Democrats, VI: Attack On Defense, II” Jan
26, 2006 "George
Bush And The Doctrine Of Original Intent"
Nov
25, 2005 “The
Future Of The Democratic Party, VII: ‘The Ten Commitments’” Oct
27, 2005 “The
Future of the Democratic Party, IV: Sept
29, 2005 "The
Bush Flood, And The Georgites: New Orleans, III" Aug
25,2005 "Some
Thoughts On The Atomic Bombing Of Japan" July
28, 2005
“Iran
Nukes, Revisited" June
23, 2005 "Why
All Of This Repression Abroad?" May
26, 2005 "Pat
Buchanan's 'What If?'" April
28, 2005 "The
Schiavo Case, IV: The Definitions Of Life And Death" March
31, 2005 “John
Bolton And The Nuclear Option" February
24, 2005 "Going
Nuclear In Iran" Jan
27, 2005
“Comparing
George W. Bush And Adolf Hitler” Dec
30, 2004
“The
‘Unless’ of the ‘Coming Second Civil War’ Series, Part I” Oct
28, 2004
Why
The Patriot Act?” Sept
30, 2004
“Four
800 Lb. Gorillas In The Campaign Room” July
29, 2004
“Some
Thoughts For and About The Kerry Campaign, IV” May
27, 2004
“On
Fascism -- And The Georgites” April
29, 2004
“On
George Bush and Religion, Part 2” March
25, 2004
“Brief
Essays” February
27, 2004 “On
Doctor Dean” |
|
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please review Title 17, Sec. 107 of the U.S. Code. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. © 2002- 2007 OLDAmericanCentury.org and OLDAmericanCentury.com |