|
|
|
9/11:
The Ultimate WMD By W. David Jenkins III “The
worst forms of tyranny, or certainly the most successful ones, are not those we
rail against but those that so insinuate themselves into the imagery of our
consciousness, and the fabric of our lives, as not to be perceived as
tyranny.” –
Michael Parenti “The
most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the
oppressed.” -
Steve Biko I
shamelessly admit it; I simply cannot “get over” 9/11 and move on. Every
time that the images of that day begin to fade in my mind, something happens or
someone says something that brings it all back again. The most recent examples
for me were a CNN on line poll and two articles which appeared in New York
magazine and SFGate.com and once again, I am reminded that I’m not the only
one out here that feels duped by the official version of events. The
poll I mentioned asked if people agreed that there was a government cover-up
regarding the events of 9/11. Out of almost fifty four thousand participants,
eighty three percent said “yes.” Now
I realize that on line polls can be less than accurate or “cyber bombed” by
web users from opposing views, but a Zogby poll from October 2004 showed that
half of the people in NYC and almost half (41%) of all New Yorkers felt that
some federal officials ''knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around
September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act.'' Then
there was We
desperately need to find a way back to 9/11 and open the whole thing back up
again. We need to stop being so afraid of asking some questions which should
have been asked years ago. We need to remember that when it comes to the events
of that day, the only “conspiracy theorists” who are engaging any form of
disrespect to the victims of that day are those who desperately cling to the
official story. We need to reopen not only the dialogue, but a real
investigation into that fateful day. Only by achieving a loud voice
demanding answers from a wide range of culprits will we deny the use of 9/11 as
a weapon, conveniently welded against the people of this country and the rest of
the world. We
have heard the old excuse ad nauseum for over four years now. Anytime a
misguided patri-idiot (including various leaders in D.C.) fears that they may be
losing an argument regarding Iraq, domestic spying or the flat tire they had
that morning, they run willy-nilly to that good old stand by; “We’re at
war!” And just to make sure they
aren’t questioned any further, they will proceed to add into their argument
that those poor victims in the That’s
9/11 as a weapon – and a very effective weapon which is designed to not only
end any discussion or dissent, but also to instill a sense of shame into anyone
who would dare question those in authority. Subsequently, these same 9/11
gunslingers have been able to break any law they see fit in their depraved quest
for imperial power and 9/11 has become the cornerstone of their whole
foundation. But
the strength of that foundation is strictly dependent upon the American
peoples’ fear of divorcing themselves from that horrible imagery long enough
to realize that they have not only been deceived, but that that deception has
caused them to embrace those who violate them. Like children who are molested by
their own parents, many Americans just cannot bring themselves to believe that
those figures who are supposed to nurture and protect them would ever do them
harm. As
an example of this mindset, I need only to point to my own father. I introduced
him to two of David Ray Griffin’s works, A
New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11
Commission Report; Lies and Omissions this last summer. Now,
I need to point out that both of my parents were among those who thought there
was little difference between Gore and Bush back in 2000. But after traveling
across the country over the last few years, they’ve related to me the things
people have been saying about the administration and they’ve wanted to know
what else is going on. What else hasn’t the media told them? So, I figured my
father was ready for For
those of you who haven’t read
“I just can’t believe my
government would do such a thing!” I
told him that it wasn’t “his government,” it was these
people (PNAC group) who would do such a thing. There are folks who think
that these people either made it happen or let it happen and it’s difficult to
prove either theory. However, what is easy to prove is that this country did not
get the whole story, let alone an accurate story, of what really happened that
day. When
one steps back and looks at the make up and conduct of the 9/11 Commission, one
quickly realizes that it was little more than a White House led undertaking to
do nothing more than “prove” the official version. Few people realize that
the decisions regarding what would be the focus of the commission were made by
Philip Zelikow, a member of Bush’s Foreign Intelligence
Advisory Board. Under
the leadership of Zelikow, the 9/11 Commission either omitted or refused to hear
testimony from first responders who were at the WTC, intelligence officials like
Sibel Edmonds who testified that the “war on terror” was corrupt in its
execution or any other testimony or blatantly obvious facts which contradicted
the official version. Go
ahead and ask people, even those who think Bush is hiding something about 9/11,
and witness how little is actually known about the events of that day or the
farcical “investigation” that resulted after years of delays, under funding
and barefaced stone-walling committed by the Bush administration. Go ahead and
point out the obvious contradictions in the official version to some people and
see how long it takes you to either be labeled a “conspiracy theorist” or
even worse, be told “don’t go
there.” But
if we are to have any chance at stopping this Bush driven American freefall
recklessly descending into something America was never meant to become, then we
must go there – and we must go there over and over with loud voices until we
can drown out the rhetoric and the fear mongering. There
have been some recent developments and additional articles that point back to
9/11 and the real need to reopen that wound in order to allow it to finally
heal. Robert Steinback of the Miami Herald recently did a piece titled Avoiding the Hard Questions which moved me to examine further many
of the points he makes regarding people’s fear of not wanting to look too
closely at 9/11. There is also a relatively new group called Scholars
for 9/11 Truth who has begun to make waves on the Internet regarding the
inconsistencies of the official version of events and I highly recommend folks
check these out if you haven’t already. There
is something folks need to remember and I think this is very important. There is
a huge difference between being a “conspiracy theorist” and having reasonable
doubts. Anyone who has taken the time to explore the government’s case
relating to 9/11 knows that it would fall apart in a court of law much as it
seems to be falling apart in the court of public opinion. You
have to wonder if some people are more fearful of learning the truth than they
are of the “terrorists.” What if it became known that we really don’t need
more security in our ports or airports? What if it became known that illegal
wire taps or the invasion of countries was not necessary in order to keep the
country safe? What if the answer to preventing another 9/11 was simply insuring
that certain people never achieved the highest positions of power in our
government? 9/11
needs to be given a decent burial instead of being used as the basis for the
policies of the most corrupt administration in American history. The victims who
perished that day and their families deserve more than respect and prayers –
they deserve justice. And until 9/11’s use as a weapon is ended, those victims
and their families will be denied those very things. And
so will the rest of us. |
|
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please review Title 17, Sec. 107 of the U.S. Code. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. © 2002- 2008 OLDAmericanCentury.org and OLDAmericanCentury.com |