(what's this?)
Discussion Forum
Headline Archive
Video Archive
Audio Archive
Document Archive
POAC counter- spin
Daily Email Newsletter
Postal newsletter
POAC Store
Recommended Books
POAC Myspace 
You can have POAC headlines emailed to you every day free of charge. Subscribe here

Paper or plastic? NO! Earth-friendly reinforced canvas grocery totes now available in the POAC store
If you are presently serving in the military or in the Delayed Enlistment Program and beginning to rethink your participation, here are resources to help you.
Your ad here: $50/week or $150/month Click for details

 Contributing Columnists

Tj Templeton
Jack Dalton
Anwaar Hussain
Doris Colmes
Crisis Papers
Vincent L Guarisco
W. David Jenkins III
Dr. Steven Jonas
Lucinda Marshall
Jason Miller
Andrew Wahl
Rowan Wolf
Reader Submissions

POAC merchandise:

T-shirts, fleece, tank-tops, prints, magnets and more...


Must-see Selections

14 points of fascism
Sept. 11: They Let it happen 
A brief history of the PNAC: a refresher 
Bush Cronyism
Catapulting the propaganda: The Rendon group
The office of special plans
The Whitehouse Iraq Group

POAC ENDORSED: The 15% Solution: A Political History of American Fascism, 2001 to 2022 

F r o m   t h e Archives

National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive makes Bush dictator in event of a terrorist attack or disaster
Former Reagan official says "something's in the works" to trigger a police state (Held over)
Whitehouse denies member of the Homeland Security Committee right to examine plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.
Iran-contra all over again. (Video) "Explosive" new Hersh scoop: Bush funneling money to Al Qaeda-related groups
Must see: What happens at Facebook.com does not stay at Facebook.com
Dateline 2002: "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq..."


The 2006 Election Is Happening Right Now

By Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers

It's crunch time, folks.

The Bush Administration is quite aware that lame-duck, second-term presidents
have a very brief window of opportunity during which they can push through
their agendas with a likelihood of success. So Karl Rove, seeing the window
starting to close, is not waiting for the midterm-election runup in 2006. He's
going for it all now.

Having taken advantage of that initial window-opening, Bush&Co. pushed
through bills involving estate taxes and bankruptcy aimed to aid their wealthy
supporters at the expense of the rest of us, and made sure to get their most loyal
lapdogs placed firmly into the key positions -- Gonzalez, Rice, Negroponte,
Chertoff, Rumsfeld, Abrams, Goss, Hadley, Wolfowitz, et al.

But this Bush bunker crew ( www.crisispapers.org/essays /bunker.htm ) is still
not quite complete. That's why Bush and Cheney are strongly supporting Tom
DeLay and John Bolton; they are counting on The Hammer and Mad Dog being there
to help bully and neutralize the opposition and keep potentially friendly
forces from getting weak-kneed and thus uncontrollable.

The second-term rush syndrome also explains why the Administration is moving
toward the so-called "nuclear option" in the Senate with regard to judicial
appointments to the appeals courts. Of course, they'd love to get their handful
of previously-rejected HardRight nominees through the Senate; accomplishing
that would be a bonus.

But what they're really after is to eliminate the Democrats' only weapon, the
filibuster/60-vote cloture rule, when it comes to judicial nominations, thus
setting a majority-vote precedent for the likely Supreme Court vacancies that
Bush expects to fill shortly.

And so, come hell or high water, the GOP is determined to break the Democrats
on this one, regardless of the consequences to political comity, the Senate,
the Constitution, the nation.

For the Busheviks, apparently it's not enough to control the Congress, the
White House, a good share of the judiciary, and the mass-media. They want the
world and they want it now. Especially as their veneer of invincibility is
starting to wear a bit thin these days.

Similarly, the Christian-Taliban wing of the Republican Party is making its
move at the same time to enforce strict fundamentalist rule; more on that below.


Internationally, the Bush Administration is getting its ducks lined up in a
row in preparation for a major move, maybe as early as June, either against
Iran or Syria. It'll be deja vu all over again, to use Yogi's apt phrase, with a
"pre-emptive" attack against an enemy that allegedly has committed a major
international insult and needs to be put in its place immediately. The U.S. can't
wait, we'll be told, otherwise the mushroom clouds may appear at any moment.

It is not clear whether the U.S. move will be a full-scale "shock&awe"
invasion or merely (!) a major missile attack from the air -- perhaps knocking out a
nuclear or military facility. But the aim will be to either effect "regime
change" in those countries by the use of force or to frighten their leaders into
giving in to whatever demands the Bush Administration will exact for leaving
them in power.

The short- and medium-term goal is to have effective control of the oil/gas
fields in the greater Middle East, at a time when "peak" oil production is
being reached in the face of increasing demand for that energy worldwide,
especially from China and India. The longe-range goal was outlined in various Project
for The New American Century manifestos that became official U.S. policy: to
preclude any national or international rival from even getting close to
challenging U.S. global hegemony. See "How We Got Into This Imperial Pickle: A PNAC
Primer." ( www.crisispapers.org/Editorial s/PNAC-Primer.htm )

------------------------------ -------------------


While the Earth itself is in dire global-warming jeopardy, with temperatures
rising and Arctic and Antarctic glaciers melting away at alarming rates, the
traditional politics of greed and power-hunger seem absolutely petty in
comparison. And yet that's where the focus is in the U.S. in general and in the
nation's capital in particular.

The American public clearly seems to be getting more nervous and fed up with
some of Bush&Co.'s more extreme positions; for example, the Social Security
privatization "reform" plan is going nowhere fast, and their crass attempt to
hijack the Schiavo family's tragedy for political gain backfired badly. Despite
these embarrassments, or maybe because of them, the HardRightists like Cheney,
Frist, DeLay and Rove are happy to encourage their supporters on the
fundamentalist Right to energize this force on behalf of a strict, Taliban-like
interpretation of law and morality.

If some of these desires can be effected into law, all the better for the
Republicans, but even if they can't get their extreme views enacted, those
controversial fights -- on the Ten Commandmants, evolution, abortion, gay rights and
so on -- serve as mighty distractions, forcing the Democrats to scatter their
energies. This keeps them from focusing on the major battles involving the
disaster in Iraq, the neo-con plans to initiate more wars, Bush's tax and tort
"reform," the corrupt vote-counting system, and so on.

While the Bush Administration is doing everything possible to keep the Iraqi
government from adopting "Sharia" (Islamic Law) into its new Constitution, it
seems eager to encourage its fundamentalist base in America to insert
Christian "Sharia" into U.S. law and custom, despite the Constitutional prohibition on
mixing church and state.


The most frightening example along these lines is the way the
Bush/fundamentalist forces are taking aim at the judiciary, and individual judges, whose
opinions they don't find strict or "Christian" enough. Some are calling for
impeachment of judges they don't like, including Supreme Court Justice Anthony
Kennedy, but others are going even further.

"Taking aim" may not be merely a figure of speech; several key politicians,
including House GOP Majority Leader DeLay and Republican Senator John Cornyn,
have moved perilously close to enciting violence against judges, all in the
name of "Christian" principles, of course. (Let us not forget that in recent
months a judge was shot and killed in Atlanta, another judge's husband and mother
were murdered in Chicago, and more threats of bodily harm against jurists are
coming in all the time.)

Far-right lawyer-author Edwin Vieira told a recent meeting of conservative
leaders that Anthony Kennedy should be impeached because his philosophy,
evidenced in his opinion striking down an anti-sodomy statute, "upholds Marxist,
Leninist, satanic principles drawn from foreign law." According to a story by the
Washington Post's Dana Milbank:

>>"Ominously, Vieira continued by saying his 'bottom line' for dealing with
the Supreme Court comes from Joseph Stalin. 'He had a slogan, and it worked
very well for him, whenever he ran into difficulty: "no man, no problem", Vieira
said. The full Stalin quote, for those who don't recognize it, is 'Death
solves all problems: no man, no problem.' Presumably, Vieira had in mind something
less extreme than Stalin did and was not actually advocating violence. But
then, these are scary times for the judiciary. An anti-judge furor may help
confirm President Bush's judicial nominees, but it also has the potential to turn

So partisan and incendiary have the rightwing-anarchist statements (
www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general /default.aspx?oid=18475 ) been that even died-in-the-wool
conservatives have felt obliged to speak out, trying to ratchet down extremist
hate speech. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a talk recently
at Goucher College that she is surprised at all the violent threats she's
receiving. "I don't think the harsh rhetoric helps," she told the crowd. "I think
it energizes people who are a little off base to take actions that maybe they
wouldn't otherwise take."


Even some staunch conservatives are trying to defuse the impeachment bomb.
Theodore Olson, the Bush Administration's former HardRight Solicitor-General
wrote in the Wall Street Journal that impeachment could put the country on a
dangerous, slippery slope:

>>"Calls to investigate judges who have made unpopular decisions are
particularly misguided, and if actually pursued, would undermine the independence that
is vital to the integrity of judicial systems. If a judge’s decisions are
corrupt or tainted, there are lawful recourses (prosecution or impeachment); but
congressional interrogations of life-tenured judges, presumably under oath, as
to why a particular decision was rendered, would constitute interference with
-- and intimidation of -- the judicial process.  And there is no logical
stopping point once this power is exercised."

But the fundamentalist Right, so pumped up with its supposed electoral clout
in the 2004 election, is not about to go silently into the night. They feel
their political power, they are convinced that their wrath is mandated by God,
and they are making their theocratic voices heard, loudly.

Peter Wallsten of the Los Angles Times reports that at a March conference in
Washington between Frist and DeLay and key evangelical leaders James Dobson
and Tony Perkins -- dealing with finding ways to remove certain judges from the
bench -- the strategy of stripping funding from certain courts was
"prominently" discussed.

"What they're thinking of is not only the fact of just making these courts go
away and re-creating them the next day but also defunding them," said
Perkins, head of the Family Research Council. He said that instead of undertaking the
long process of trying to impeach judges, Congress could use its
appropriations authority to "just take away the bench, all of his staff, and he's just
sitting out there with nothing to do." These curbs on courts are "on the radar
screen, especially of conservatives here in Congress," he said.

Wallsten writes that Dobson, head of Focus on the Family, who emerged last
year as one of the evangelical movement's most important political leaders,
named one potential target: the California-based U.S. 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals. "Very few people know this, that the Congress can simply disenfranchise a cou
rt," Dobson said. "They don't have to fire anybody or impeach them or go
through that battle. All they have to do is say the 9th Circuit doesn't exist
anymore, and it's gone."

In short, friends, the Bush Administration, by cozying up to Christian
Talibanists like these and others around the country -- browbeating school boards on
evolution and sex-education, threatening teachers who refuse to treat
creationist points of view as equal to those of scientists, censoring textbooks, etc.
-- indicates that America, at least broad swatches of it, are moving back
into a cultural Know-Nothing era that is truly frightening. All this at the same
time we're fighting battles with Islamist fundamentalists because they have
the "wrong" God and want to battle the forces of modernity in their own
cultures and in ours as well. We imitate what we fear.

------------------------------ ---------------


I could go on and on listing the scary things done or encouraged by the Bush
Administration in its partisan zeal to get what it wants, and to set the table
for future Rightwing administrations by decimating or eliminating its
political opposition. But I think you get the point:

The big Bush&Co. push for power and greed is happening right now. We in the
opposition can't sit around and think we'll mobilize a few months before the
2006 midterm election. This IS the 2006 election. We have to activate our troops
and strategies immediately. If we don't push back, and fight them now, we
will have lost that election before it even begins, and thus a chance to start to
turn this country around. More importantly, if we choose not to act, we risk
losing our self-respect and our political souls.

It's time to organize, mobilize, agitate, to donate money to the politicans
and organizations that are out there taking the fight to the forces of
regression. It is time for each of us to organize and fight for the Constitution, the
separation of powers, the sanctity of the division between church and state,
to ally ourselves with traditional and moderate Republicans and Libertarians.
These alliances are being made to correct the worst aspects of the Patriot Act,
so we should be able to find other areas where we might be able to agree --
on the wrong-headed nomination of John Bolton, on Bush's Social Security scam,
on privacy rights, on extremist judges, etc.

In short, 2005 is 2006. And, for the sake of our country, we can't afford to
lose this election battle. We may not be able at the moment to guarantee that
our actual votes in 2006 will be counted honestly, but we can win the current
election campaign in the court of public opinion, in the halls of the
Congress, in our churches and synagogues and mosques.

The Bush agenda is vulnerable in a number of key areas -- the general
perception of the GOP as arrogantly over-reaching, the public not buying the
administration's reckless Social Security scheme, the general feeling that John Bolton
is not the right man for the U.N. job, the revulsion against how the GOP used
the Schiavo family's tragedy for political ends, the continuing disaster that
is Iraq, etc., etc.

It's time to crank it up, and send this amoral, greedy, control-hungry
administration a message that their lame-duck power has run out. If we do our
political and ethical/spiritual homework with due diligence, our
progressive/moderate opposition could well be accepted as among the key moral forces of this
nation. Let's get to work.#


Bernard Weiner, Ph.D. in government & international relations, has taught at
various universities, worked as a writer/editor with the San Francisco
Chronicle, and currently co-edits The Crisis Papers (www.crisispapers.org).

Originally published by The Crisis Papers and Democratic Underground 4/26/05.

Copyright 2005 by Bernard Weiner.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please review Title 17, Sec. 107 of the U.S. Code. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

privacy policy

© 2002- 2006  OLDAmericanCentury.org and OLDAmericanCentury.com