|
| |
|
|
|
Why Did Bush Lie us into Iraq? |
 |
| During the last democratic
debate the moderators asked both Sharpton and Kucinich, the two most
outspoken liberals on the panel, "If the Bush administration did in
fact lie about the reasons for war, why did they?" Neither of them
pointed out how the Bush administration hierarchy, and the companies that they represent, are making
billions from this illegal war. With the 9-11 Commission finding no link
between Iraq and 9-11 and with the search for WMDs proving that Iraq was
not only NOT a threat, but completely defenseless, we now have to
ask ourselves if there could have been some other motivation.
At the bottom of this article I have included a few links to articles and
video files on this topic. |
|
| Related reading: |
| The
Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies About War and Terrorism |
| THE
WINDFALLS OF WAR Someone's getting rich of this war and it isn't you
or me |
| STUDY
says firms used insider ties to win contracts Houston Chronicle, TX |
| IRAQ
war windfall for US companies Mail & Guardian |
| BIG
Iraqi Contracts Went To Big GOP Donors CBS News |
| GENEROUS
New Tax Break For Bechtel and Halliburton Democracy Now |
| POWELL'S
"TERRORIST FACTORY" TURNS OUT TO BE RUINS, BAKERY
Observer |
| Bush
Documents Supporting Iraq Attack Do Not Exist
Village Voice |
|
| Related viewing: |
| Video:Exposed:
The Carlyle Group How The The Military-Industrial Complex Has Subverted
Americas Democracy The first few minutes are in Dutch. |
|
| Remember these? |
|
The claim that Saddam Hussein had
issued chemical weapons to front- line troops who would use them when US
forces crossed into Iraq—no such weapons were used and none were found
when the Iraqi military collapsed under the weight of the US assault. |
| The claim that Iraq had massive
stockpiles of chemical and biological agents, including nerve gas,
anthrax and botulinum toxin— nothing has been found, despite searches
at hundreds of sites targeted before the war by US intelligence reports. |
| Iraq was six months
away from developing a nuclear weapon. The claim that thousands of aluminum
tubes imported by Iraq could be used in centrifuges to create enriched
uranium—debunked by the International Atomic Energy Agency as well as
by American nuclear scientists. |
| The claim that Iraq had up to 20
long-range Scud missiles, prohibited under UN sanctions—no such
rockets have been found, nor were any fired during the military
conflict. |
| Powell claimed he
had proof positive Iraq was linked to al-Qaida through Ansar al-Islam,
a small, 600-man Islamist group in the Kurdish region of northern Iraq
(not under Saddam's control), and through a "deadly terrorist
network" led by one Abu Musa al-Zarqawi. (The first charge was
immediately dismissed by Ansar's leader, Mullah Krekar, a longtime,
bitter foe of Saddam. Many
reputable experts on terrorism scoffed at Powell's overblown charges.) |
| Satellite imagery -
ammo storage bunkers which Powell claimed were used for chemical weapons
that were moved out prior to inspection. (UN inspectors examined
them and found nothing suspicious. "Sniffers" used by
inspectors can detect the past presence of chemical and biological
weapons.) |
|
| "Iraq
has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be
used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We're
concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVS for missions
targeting the United States." |
| The
infamous mobile biological weapons labs mounted on trucks - a.k.a.
"Saddam's vans of death." Powell claimed defectors
reported there were 18 of these cruising around Iraq. (Defector
information is always suspect.) UN chief arms inspector Hans Blix said
his men had examined some of the "death trucks" and found they
were, in fact, mobile food-testing labs.) |
|
|
|
|
|
For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on
one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as justification for invading
Iraq) because it was the one reason everyone could agree on. Paul
Wolfowitz Vanity Fair interview May 28, 2003 |
They may have had time to destroy them, and
I don't know the answer. Donald Rumsfeld Remarks to Council on Foreign
Relations May 27, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|