Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: PNAC turned British
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Politics In General
Max-1
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/

IPB Image

The British Moment
The first publication of The Henry Jackson Society, published by The Social Affairs Unit; out now!

The British Moment, the flagship publication of The Henry Jackson Society, calls for a new way of thinking about British foreign, security and defence policy in the twenty-first century and argues that the time is ripe for Britain to play a leading and progressive role in promoting democracy and human rights across the globe. The British Moment's authors argue it is time for Britain, and indeed, the rest of Europe, to reclaim the noble tradition of liberal interventionism and pursue an active strategy across the globe.

Chapters

The British Moment is divided into the following chapters:
  1. A principle-led foreign policy
  2. Britain and the world
  3. Britain and Europe
  4. Britain and the Middle East
  5. Britain and Africa
  6. Britain and the rise of China
Purchase and Publisher Details
  • To buy The British Moment, please click here.
  • For the website of The Social Affairs Unit, please click here.
  • For further information, please contact Matthew Jamison, theMedia Secretary.
Created by admin
©2005 The Henry Jackson Society
Last modified 2006-07-04 16:40
=================================================================================
The Henry Jackson Society is a non-profit and non-partisan organisation that seeks to promote the following principles: that liberal democracy should be spread across the world; that as the world's most powerful democracies, the United States and the European Union – under British leadership – must shape the world more actively by intervention and example; that such leadership requires political will, a commitment to universal human rights and the maintenance of a strong military with global expeditionary reach; and that too few of our leaders in Britain and the rest of Europe today are ready to play a role in the world that matches our strength and responsibilities.

The Henry Jackson Society intends, therefore, to provide a platform for much-needed discussion and research. It will attempt to mobilise support behind a principled policy of democratic geopolitics. For further elaboration please see our Statement of Principles.

The Henry Jackson Society is a Registered Charity (No. 1113948).

=================================================================================

Statement of Principles

Cambridge, 11th March 2005

The pursuit of a robust foreign policy was one of Henry 'Scoop' Jackson's most central concerns. This was to be based on clear universal principles such as the global promotion of the rule of law, liberal democracy, civil rights, environmental responsibility and the market economy. The western policies of strength and human rights, which later hastened the collapse of the Soviet dictatorship, owed much to Jackson's example. The fundamental and enduring values of the modern democratic world eventually prevailed.

Yet perhaps we were too complacent during the immediate post-Cold War period. New threats to the very essence of liberal democracies challenged our resolve. Our failures in the former Yugoslavia (especially Bosnia) were more than just moral. Through their impact on the credibility of our international institutions, such as NATO and the EU, they had a profound effect on the national interests of western powers. These fiascos showed that we had to engage, robustly and sometimes preventatively. The early interventions in Kosovo and Sierra Leone, although imperfect, provide an appropriate model for future action. But modernisation and democratisation often does not require a military solution. For example, the European Union has been instrumental in expanding its democratic 'Grand Area' on the continent since the fall of the Iron Curtain. So has NATO, through the process of eastern enlargement, and various initiatives engaging the Soviet successor states.

We believe, therefore, that Henry Jackson's legacy is as relevant today as his policies were during the Cold War; indeed, perhaps it is even more important than at any time previously. Therefore, the Henry Jackson Society:

1. Believes that modern liberal democracies set an example to which the rest of the world should aspire.

2. Supports a 'forward strategy' to assist those countries that are not yet liberal and democratic to become so. This would involve the full spectrum of our 'carrot' capacities, be they diplomatic, economic, cultural or political, but also, when necessary, those 'sticks' of the military domain.

3. Supports the maintenance of a strong military, by the United States, the countries of the European Union and other democratic powers, armed with expeditionary capabilities with a global reach.

4. Supports the necessary furtherance of European military modernisation and integration under British leadership, preferably within NATO.

5. Stresses the importance of unity between the world's great democracies, represented by institutions such as NATO, the European Union and the OECD, amongst many others.

6. Believes that only modern liberal democratic states are truly legitimate, and that any international organisation which admits undemocratic states on an equal basis is fundamentally flawed.

7. Gives two cheers for capitalism. There are limits to the market, which needs to serve the Democratic Community and should be reconciled to the environment.

8. Accepts that we have to set priorities and that sometimes we have to compromise, but insists that we should never lose sight of our fundamental values. This means that alliances with repressive regimes can only be temporary. It also means a strong commitment to individual and civil liberties in democratic states, even and especially when we are under attack.

The Henry Jackson Society is dedicated to researching and debating these issues. We do not represent any specific political party or persuasion, but provide a forum for those who agree with these simple guiding principles, or who wish to learn more about them.

Supported by,

Rt. Hon. Michael Ancram QC MP
Member of Parliament for Devizes

Gerard Baker
Assistant Editor, The Times

Paul Beaver
Special Advisor to the Parliamentary Defence Committee; Director, Beaver Westminster Ltd.

Prof. Paul Bew
Professor of Politics, Queen's University, Belfast

Prof. Vernon Bogdanor
Brasenose College, University of Oxford

Nicholas Boles
Director, Policy Exchange

Colonel Tim Collins
Commander, First Battalion Royal Irish Regiment, Iraq 2003

Prof. Paul Cornish
Carrington Professor of International Security, RIIA

Sir Richard Dearlove
Master of Pembroke College; Former Head of MI6

Major-General John Drewienkiewicz
Military Advisor to the High Representative for Bosnia

Mark Etherington
Civil Governor, Wasit (Kut) province, Iraq, 2003-2004

Michael Gove MP
Member of Parliament for Surrey Heath; Shadow Minister for Housing

Robert Halfon
Political Director, Conservative Friends of Israel

Oliver Kamm
Columnist, The Times

Jackie Lawrence
Former Member of Parliament for Preseli Pembrokeshire

Dr. Denis MacShane MP
Member of Parliament for Rotherham

Jan Mortier
Associate of the Council for a Community of Democracies

Fionnuala Jay O'Boyle MBE
Director, Jay Associates

Prof. Andrew Lever
University of Cambridge

Stephen Pollard
Columnist, The Times

Greg Pope MP
Member of Parliament for Hyndburn; Member of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee

Lord Powell of Bayswater
Personal Advisor to the Prime Minister for Defence and Security, 1984-1991

Andrew Roberts
Author, Journalist and Television Presenter

Dr. Jamie Shea
Deputy Assistant Secretary General for External Relations, NATO

Dr. Irwin Stelzer
Director of Economic Policy Studies, Hudson Institute

Gisela Stuart MP
Member of Parliament for Birmingham Edgbaston; Member of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee

Rt. Hon. David Trimble
Former Member of Parliament for Upper Bann; Winner of Nobel Peace Prize

Edward Vaizey MP
Member of Parliament for Wantage

David Willetts MP
Member of Parliament for Havant; Shadow Education Secretary

ORGANISING COMMITTEE

Brendan Simms
Co-President

Alan Mendoza
Co-President

James M. Rogers
Executive Secretary

Gideon A. Mailer
Secretary

Matthew Jamison
Media Secretary

Martyn Frampton
Web-Editor

International Patrons of The Henry Jackson Society

Bruce P. Jackson
President, The Project for Transitional Democracies

Robert Kagan
Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

William Kristol
Editor, The Weekly Standard

Vytautas Landsbergis
Former President of Lithuania

Clifford May
President, Foundation for the Defence of Democracies

Michael McFaul
Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution; Senior Advisor, National Democratic Institute

Joshua Muravchik
Former President, The Young People's Socialist League

Richard Perle
Former American Assistant Secretary of Defence

General Jack Sheehan
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic


================================================================================= Geo-Strategic Sections
Britain in the World
Greater Europe
The Americas
Greater Middle East
Africa
Asia / Pacific Rim
Russia and Eurasia
Other Sections
Governance / Strategy
Environment / Economy
Northern Ireland
The Cost of Military Intervention
Other
Who was Henry Jackson?
Organising Committee
Disclaimer
Suggestions
Links
Blogs
=================================================================================
Editorials
IPB Image Launch Editorial for The Henry Jackson Society
Cambridge, 11th March 2005
IPB Image The Cartoons Row: Regimes Provoke Extremism
Cambridge, 07th March 2006
IPB Image Liberty versus Security: the Oldest Dilemma
Cambridge, 26th January 2006
IPB Image Between a Rock and a Hard Place? Where Next for the West's Iran Policy?
Cambridge, 20th September 2005
IPB Image The London Attacks: Causes and Responses
Cambridge, 01st August 2005
IPB Image Europe Needs New Leadership After the Non and Nee
Cambridge, 06th June 2005
IPB Image Uzbekistan: Democratic Geopolitics, Not (Un-) Realpolitik
Cambridge, 25th May 2005
IPB Image The Boycott of Israeli Universities
Cambridge, 06th May 2005
yankhadenuf
It's unconscionable how the HJS spouts off about a "progressive role in promoting democracy and human rights across the globe." when clearly they intend to dictate to the world through militaristic means. I'm sure it did not go un-noticed by you, Max, that William Kristol and the rest of his gang did NOT list PNAC in their affiliations. I do not comprehend how these front groups that promote massive violence are allowed to exist in America and Britain.
Gadzooks!
Jeezis Fuck! Here we go again...pnac is not listed because pnac has failed. They will leave the rest of the world to clean up their wreckage and move on to another group of wealthy megalomaniacs to fund and facilitate their insanity.
Max-1
PNAC is listed under LINKS.

Also, look at the international supporters.

And take a look-see under their Geo-Stratigic sections. Looks very similar to PNAC around 1999.

Say, when is Blair due to step out?

yankhadenuf
QUOTE(Max-1 @ Saturday, 8 July 2006, 11:57 am) [snapback]62814[/snapback]

PNAC is listed under LINKS.

Also, look at the international supporters....



HJS' LINKS has the following disclaimer before they list PNAC:
"The Henry Jackson Society is not responsible for the content of external internet sites."
(oh brother rolleyes.gif , even though the same roguish thugs are on the external sites ?! )

After looking at the international supporters, anyone would conclude that PNAC is responsible for HJS's content ! evil.gif
sky of mind
Interesting, I was just thinking about good ol Scoop a few moments ago.



Look, the Neo-cons CAN be stopped. Just as soon as enough of us (the people) want that to happen.
Those people ONLY manage anything through the use of ignorance and fear!
If the people have not yet gotten the message, then perhap we haven't yet learned how to express these facts into ways in which they can both hear and believe?

I believe we have made huge progress in the last year, even though most of that progress comes as a result of the perceived pains of Americans. I almost said Republican Bumbling, but I've come to understand that the Neo-con Republican plan has been exceptionally successful. That the governmental aftermath of Katrina was no accident. It all happened exactly as they wanted it to! The same with the occupation of Iraq. The same with the economy, and gas prices. To us it looks like bumbling, but in reality it's exactly what they intend.

No, we can't expect them to stop doing what they are doing, and no we can't expect to ever be able to reason with them. So, we must instead refocus our energies on the REAL POWER. And that is the people of America. "THEY" don't have any power, any more than "WE" do. It's all illusion. What we can do, is figure out how to influence public opinion. The same public opinion "THEY" have manipulated so masterfully for a decade now. If "THEY" can do it, then fuck yeah, "WE" can too! All we gotta do is figure out how. And if the People of this country fail to grasp what we are saying, then "WE" have failed to communicate successfully.


"THEY" can be stopped! The only question still remaining is, how much pain will be required first?
yankhadenuf
QUOTE(sky of mind @ Saturday, 8 July 2006, 12:20 pm) [snapback]62817[/snapback]

..."THEY" can be stopped! The only question still remaining is, how much pain will be required first?


I think websites like this (and POAC messages on merchandise & bumperstickers) and your "Google PNAC" sign have brought the awareness factor a long way , sky. Last year, when I googled PNAC , the searches numbered 780,000. Today when I Google PNAC , the number is :

ONE MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND!!!
sky of mind
QUOTE(yankhadenuf @ Saturday, 8 July 2006, 11:33 am) [snapback]62820[/snapback]

I think websites like this (and POAC messages on merchandise & bumperstickers) and your "Google PNAC" sign have brought the awareness factor a long way , sky. Last year, when I googled PNAC , the searches numbered 780,000. Today when I Google PNAC , the number is :

ONE MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND!!!





That's great Yank!
Now lets figure out how to get the message to those who don't get their news from the internet.
And an even bigger challenge, lets figure out how to get the information to those who simply do not want to know!


ANY dialoge is better than no dialoge.
Even bad dialoge, is a good start!
yankhadenuf
QUOTE(sky of mind @ Saturday, 8 July 2006, 12:47 pm) [snapback]62825[/snapback]

...Now lets figure out how to get the message to those who don't get their news from the internet.
And an even bigger challenge, lets figure out how to get the information to those who simply do not want to know!
ANY dialoge is better than no dialoge.
Even bad dialoge, is a good start!



If only there was some way the bloggers could talk BBC into making a documentary comparing PNAC & HJS?

(to Mein Kampf?)
sky of mind
QUOTE(yankhadenuf @ Saturday, 8 July 2006, 12:25 pm) [snapback]62834[/snapback]

If only there was some way the bloggers could talk BBC into making a documentary comparing PNAC & HJS?

(to Mein Kampf?)





And if they did, would it reach those that most need to see it?
The message isn't the issue. We internet liberals all know the story by heart!
The problem is getting that story to the unwashed masses, and having them actually want to pay attention!



There was reciently a very good analogy about peoples awareness of global warming, that I think is an equally good analogy here too.

Put a lobster into a pot of boiling water and immediately the lobster knows something is terribly wrong!
But put a lobster into regular water, and slowly raise the temp, the lobster will swim about blissfully unaware, until it's way too late.

If you could grab a few "I don't wanna know" Americans from 20 years ago and thrust them into todays reality, they would be so shocked they would go back and scream bloody murder about what was coming! But we can't do that. So like the lobster in the regular water, we don't see the slow changes.

And my question remains, how do we get people to realize that change is happeneing, and it's effecting their way of life in ways they might not agree with? How do we get people to understand that getting Jr's GPA up is important, but so is losing your privacy to your government? How do we get them to understand that owning that SUV and bitching about the price of gas is such an important hypocracy?

Does anyone see my point? It's about the general awareness of the people, and there is a large segment that is most difficult to reach, and because they are the most difficult to reach, they are the most important to reach!

With 17 weeks to go before possibly our last chance to change the course of this mega-cruise ship, this is the last challenge remaining.
yankhadenuf
QUOTE(sky of mind @ Saturday, 8 July 2006, 1:41 pm) [snapback]62838[/snapback]

And if they did, would it reach those that most need to see it?
The message isn't the issue. We internet liberals all know the story by heart!
The problem is getting that story to the unwashed masses, and having them actually want to pay attention!
....
With 17 weeks to go before possibly our last chance to change the course of this mega-cruise ship, this is the last challenge remaining.


We gotta start somewhere... I don't see anyone else making a documentary about it besides BBC or how about Frontline on PBS . Frontline did a good job with the "Dark Side".
There are a lot of people who watch PBS who do not blog, so maybe Frontline reached a certain percentage of non-blogging masses?

I hear Al Gore's global warming movie is great... maybe it will reach the masses enough to change the tide in November, even though it has nothing to do with Iraq War.

To reach the masses you wanna reach , sky, you need a free concert with lots of free BBQ & beer... get them drunk as hell , then turn the music off & indoctrinate them with the truth tongue.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.