Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Kerry Enters Legal Fray In Ohio...
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Elections
Dr. Left
John Kerry entered the legal fray when Blackwell refused to show up to give a dipositions on 27 December....it's about time KERRY....




http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1228-01.htm


Doc
Ronnie Jakers
QUOTE
President George Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney and White House Political Advisor Karl Rove received notice that they will be deposed Tuesday and Wednesday, December 28 and 29. The trio’s Ohio attorney, Kurt Tunnell, so far claims his clients have not been properly served. Under Ohio law, the Republican-dominated Ohio Supreme Court is responsible for serving the three with subpoenas.


Well we all know they won't testify.. nor will they do it under oath... nor will they do it individually... but all three together.

and good for kerry for jumping in... FINALLY!
logosoco
but...but...bush is on vacation...all that hard work ya know!



rolleyes.gif
Dr. Left
QUOTE (logosoco @ Wednesday, 29 December 2004, 8:32 am)
but...but...bush is on vacation...all that hard work ya know!



rolleyes.gif

Yeah it's hard work stealing an election, it really is, it's hard work, really, really hard....yeah right


Doc
Panda
QUOTE (Dr. Left @ Wednesday, 29 December 2004, 6:56 am)
John Kerry entered the legal fray when Blackwell refused to show up to give a dipositions on 27 December....it's about time KERRY....




http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1228-01.htm


Doc

Sorry, Doc.
I can't get it up for Kerry any more.
Too little too late.

I tried so hard after he was handed to us by the DNC/DLC.
DINOs ALL! (Well, a couple of exceptions.)
They fucked my nominees royally.
Still, I worked my ass off.
He let me down.
He didn't fight.

A Dean/Clark/Kucinich coalition is our hope now.
The Blue NeoDem Progressive Pragmatic Party.
All three of them are fighters....and wouldn't have made that concession speech.

Kerry's on vacation....skiing in Idaho at one of his homes.
Yeah, he gives a fuck. My cynicism is showing.
Yes, Mr. Kerry I'm still "crying in my teacup" over 2000.
No, I won't "get over it" as you suggested.

Bonesmen. Remember that. Bonesmen.


Read all about it.....from Nazis to BFEE
http://www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm
The Skull and Bones - Yale University
The occult Bush family 'dossier'
user posted image
rexateyfor
We'll see about Mr Kerry, I have to agree with Panda he could have fought but that didnt seem to be in his agenda. Seems Kerry is only good at talkign about a fight he once played a small part in 30 years ago. Kinda reminds me of Al Bundy and his highschool football war stories.

The only difference I could see between Bush and Kerry is, Kerry stood a bit taller and spoke better. Perhaps he could have made a difference but I honestly think if this is the way he shows up to fight for whats his, then I dont think I want him fighting for whats supposed to be ours.

Kerry or Bush, two sides of the same coin
Arthur Ruger
Sent the following letter 50 Senators and 50 Media emails:

December 30, 2004

The work of Representative Conyers and all those who have explored and
investigated the State of Ohio's management of the Presidential election
makes a powerful statement. Among members of both houses of Congress one
may find legitimate concern for elections as such a vital key to the
existence, value and efficacy of democratic process.

Without legitimacy in our elections, we are left in something worse than a
"third world" state in that we will have lost something formerly possessed
that is lacking in most third world states - confidence that government of
the people and by the people is an attainable goal.

Without legitimacy in our elections we create a future election-time
circumstance when apathy and indifference become almost insurmountable
problems. Insurmountable apathy, indifference and distrust of the value of
voting bring to us the loss of the most powerful aspect of checking
dominance and potential abuse of executive, legislative or judicial power.
This is the precise basis of what liberty in this country looks like.

Liberty in this country must look like and prove to be in fact the means
by which a populace can - by peaceful means - change not just the leaders
but the direction of movement for a nation.

I live in Washington State where an unbelievably close election was
ultimately resolved through a recount process that included investigation.
This was done for the most part in the absence of serious allegations of
vote tampering, interference in the technology of election process as well
as deliberate harassment and discouragement of voters. As a result,
although flaws in the election process were revealed, we have a
governor-elect.

Those who have explored and investigated the electoral processes in Ohio
however have uncovered incidents of vote tampering, interference in voting
technology and harassment of voters. These took several forms including
deliberate decisions that resulted in unreasonable waiting in line and
unreasonable inconveniences - overt actions meant to discourage voting.

Residual doubts and lack of confidence in the 2000 Presidential Election
in Florida now pale before what has been engendered in Ohio. If not
challenged, Ohio 2004 will be recorded in history as a moment in time when
the American nation betrayed itself and refused any attempt at setting
aright our national integrity and confidence in our own system.

Need it be said that any Democratic Senator who does not formally sign an
electoral challenge of the Ohio vote on January 6 is doing more than
refusing to keep faith with their party? Every one of you who do not sign
will bear a future shame and loss of credibility for much more than your
party or your own future personal candidacy.

Either you stand for democracy in its simplest expressive form or you
cowardly bow to demagogues who presume to dictate the definition of
American patriotism to the rest of us. We voted you into your positions as
extensions of our will with an expectation that you will do for us in the
halls of power what we cannot do ourselves. In my opinion, there is no
intellectual, patriotic or sophisticated rationale for refusing to sign
the Ohio challenge on January 6th that will justify why you ran for office
in the first place.

The attempted electoral challenge in 2000 that was defeated under the
gavel of Mr. Gore himself fully demonstrated - in a shameful public manner
- what it looks like when those chosen turn their backs on those who did
the choosing.

Are you willing to take upon yourselves the same mantle?

Would you expect future support from people for whom you have demonstrated
a failed-patriotism at a time when it was most needed?

Sincerely,

Arthur & Lietta Ruger
Panda
QUOTE (Arthur Ruger @ Thursday, 30 December 2004, 9:26 pm)
Sent the following letter 50 Senators and 50 Media emails:

December 30, 2004

The work of Representative Conyers and all those who have explored and
investigated the State of Ohio's management of the Presidential election
makes a powerful statement.  Among members of both houses of Congress one
may find legitimate concern for elections as such a vital key to the
existence, value and efficacy of democratic process.

Without legitimacy in our elections, we are left in something worse than a
"third world" state in that we will have lost something formerly possessed
that is lacking in most third world states - confidence that government of
the people and by the people is an attainable goal.

Without legitimacy in our elections we create a future election-time
circumstance when apathy and indifference become almost insurmountable
problems. Insurmountable apathy, indifference and distrust of the value of
voting bring to us the loss of the most powerful aspect of checking
dominance and potential abuse of executive, legislative or judicial power.
This is the precise basis of what liberty in this country looks like.

Liberty in this country must look like and prove to be in fact the means
by which a populace can - by peaceful means - change not just the leaders
but the direction of movement for a nation.

I live in Washington State where an unbelievably close election was
ultimately resolved through a recount process that included investigation.
This was done for the most part in the absence of serious allegations of
vote tampering, interference in the technology of election process as well
as deliberate harassment and discouragement of voters. As a result,
although flaws in the election process were revealed, we have a
governor-elect.

Those who have explored and investigated the electoral processes in Ohio
however have uncovered incidents of vote tampering, interference in voting
technology and harassment of voters. These took several forms including
deliberate decisions that resulted in unreasonable waiting in line and
unreasonable inconveniences - overt actions meant to discourage voting.

Residual doubts and lack of confidence in the 2000 Presidential Election
in Florida now pale before what has been engendered in Ohio. If not
challenged, Ohio 2004 will be recorded in history as a moment in time when
the American nation betrayed itself and refused any attempt at setting
aright our national integrity and confidence in our own system.

Need it be said that any Democratic Senator who does not formally sign an
electoral challenge of the Ohio vote on January 6 is doing more than
refusing to keep faith with their party? Every one of you who do not sign
will bear a future shame and loss of credibility for much more than your
party or your own future personal candidacy.

Either you stand for democracy in its simplest expressive form or you
cowardly bow to demagogues who presume to dictate the definition of
American patriotism to the rest of us. We voted you into your positions as
extensions of our will with an expectation that you will do for us in the
halls of power what we cannot do ourselves. In my opinion, there is no
intellectual, patriotic or sophisticated rationale for refusing to sign
the Ohio challenge on January 6th that will justify why you ran for office
in the first place.

The attempted electoral challenge in 2000 that was defeated under the
gavel of Mr. Gore himself fully demonstrated - in a shameful public manner
- what it looks like when those chosen turn their backs on those who did
the choosing.

Are you willing to take upon yourselves the same mantle?

Would you expect future support from people for whom you have demonstrated
a failed-patriotism at a time when it was most needed?

Sincerely,

Arthur & Lietta Ruger

Excellent....I'll do a mailing tomorrow too.

Here's Conyer's letter for JUST ONE SENATOR to join him....JUST ONE!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240
.....
Conyers' letter today was addressed to Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California. It follows in its entirety:

"Dear Senator Boxer,
"As you know, on January 6, 2005, at 1:00 P.M, the electoral votes for the election of the president are to be opened and counted in a joint session of Congress, commencing at 1:00 P.M. I and a number of House Members are planning to object to the counting of the Ohio votes, due to numerous unexplained irregularities in the Ohio presidential vote, many of which appear to violate both federal and state law. I am hoping that you will consider joining us in this important effort to debate and highlight the problems in Ohio which disenfranchised innumerable voters. I will shortly forward you a draft report itemizing and analyzing the many irregularities we have come across as part of our hearings and investigation into the Ohio presidential election.
"3 U.S.C. §15 provides when the results from each of the states are announced, that "the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any." Any objection must be presented in writing and "signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received.The objection must "state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof. When an objection has been properly made in writing and endorsed by a member of each body the Senate withdraws from the House chamber, and each body meets separately to consider the objection. "No votes . . . from any other State shall be acted upon until the [pending] objection . . . [is] finally disposed of." 3 U.S.C. §17 limits debate on the objections in each body to two hours, during which time no member may speak more than once and not for more than five minutes. Both the Senate and the House must separately agree to the objection; otherwise, the challenged vote or votes are counted.
"Historically, there appears to be three general grounds for objecting to the counting of electoral votes. The language of 3 U.S.C. §15 suggests that objection may be made on the grounds that (1) a vote was not "regularly given" by the challenged elector(s); and/or (2) the elector(s) was not "lawfully certified" under state law; or (3) two slates of electors have been presented to Congress from the same State.
"Since the Electoral Count Act of 1887, no objection meeting the requirements of the Act have been made against an entire slate of state electors. In the 2000 election several Members of the House of Representatives attempted to challenge the electoral votes from the State of Florida. However, no Senator joined in the objection, and therefore, the objection was not "received." In addition, there was no determination whether the objection constituted an appropriate basis under the 1887 Act. However, if a State - in this case Ohio - has not followed its own procedures and met its obligation to conduct a free and fair election, a valid objection -if endorsed by at least one Senator and a Member of the House of Representatives- should be debated by each body separately until "disposed of".
"Sincerely, John Conyers, Jr."

.....
Dr. Left
Hey guys I agree, Kerry let us all down, I am so sick of the DNC, I could puke.... barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif barf.gif damn, I feel so much better now.

Doc
sarasotarepub
this post has been edited by an admin.

We are grown ups trying to have an adult conversation. Lets try to keep that theme going.

hee hee!
happymisanthropy
QUOTE (sarasotarepub @ Friday, 7 January 2005, 8:13 pm)
Hee,hee! Like you really thought Kerry was gonna win!
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH! PLEASE! Losers WithOutBorders
Please Apply Here...<<-- ph34r.gif

Sara, if you were really wealthy enough to benefit from Bush's policies, you wouldn't be wasting your time on this site. So, balance your tax cut with your health insurance costs, and tell me who real loser is?
huh.gif
Are you really so happy with what's going on in the world, Sara? Because you're running out of liberals to blame.
Panda
QUOTE (sarasotarepub @ Friday, 7 January 2005, 8:13 pm)
Hee,hee! Like you really thought Kerry was gonna win!
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!  PLEASE!  Losers WithOutBorders
Please Apply Here...<<-- ph34r.gif



Um, no. We knew he wouldn't "win" the election under the current "rules".

In a FAIR primary process we would have won.
Many Republicans re-registered as Democrats to skew it for the other bonesman.

In a FAIR election we would have won.

But this one and the 2000 selection were rigged.
We knew it would be rigged again.
We're under no illusions just because we believe in humanism as opposed to neocon domination of the world.

They'll need a lot more serfs to get the job done properly. Get ready.....next tier of the American Middle Class is ready to be taken down by the BFEE.
Soon, no Americans will be able to afford all the cheap goods we have made for us in China.
And we owe China a TON of money. Coincidence?

Don't you have ANY doubts in your mind about the electronic voting machines and no paper trail? Also the complaints from SO many voters nationwide.....they can't ALL be lying Libruls who hate king george. Some Republicans even complained...not good enough?
No doubts at all in your mind?

You SINCERELY believe that all is on the up and up in Florida, Ohio, Georgia, Tennessee and all the other states reporting problems?

Just ask yourself the same question I always ask myself:
"Who benefits?" Usually it leads back to a money trail and the neocons.
Google a few things about electronic voting machines and the problems.
While you're at it....google who OWNS the machines.

Ask yourself if Democrats owned those same machines would you feel it was all fair and square.


BTW isn't it strange how low your boy's poll numbers are with people who supposedly flocked from the heartland to vote for him in droves......more voters than were even registered some places. Sort of a magical election process. Low poll numbers......yet wins all over the place.

Prove that Chimpy won fair and square. And really, I'm not arguing for argument's sake....I'd really like the answers to these questions too.

And I still say CA should withold ALL our Federal taxes from the rest of you and just see how y'all get through your next crisis.

In true conservative fashion I say we all take care of our own. We'll each take care of our own state. CA will be fine. Would ANY red state survive without blue state taxes. Nope.

You know, as long as the SUV starts up okay and the kids get to the games and practices and the two week vacation is still guaranteed...although most don't take them.....nothing will change.


Oh, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer
In the meantime, in between time...ain't we got fun.

I predict a surge in musicals as the depression looms.
Who will be the new Shirley Temple?
Dr. Left
QUOTE (sarasotarepub @ Friday, 7 January 2005, 8:13 pm)
Hee,hee! Like you really thought Kerry was gonna win!
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH! PLEASE! Losers WithOutBorders
Please Apply Here...<<-- ph34r.gif

Yeah your right Sara, the odds are in favor of the house it's tuff enough to win, but whent he deck is stacked in favor of the house it's impossible to win. So the "Losers" are the American people you stupid moron.

Doc
POAC
when you can in no way disprove the criminal allegations against the ruling administration you can always fall back on "hee hee You're losers. hee hee". In other words: He's got nothin' so he's gotta troll.
Dr. Left
QUOTE (POAC @ Monday, 10 January 2005, 6:49 am)
when you can in no way disprove the criminal allegations against the ruling administration you can always fall back on "hee hee You're losers. hee hee". In other words: He's got nothin' so he's gotta troll.

That's right, and let's face it he never has anything, he is nothing but a mindless troll, that listens to Hannity and the rest of the morons and nod's his head in agreement muttering over and over again "ditto....dittto...ditto"


Doc
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.