POAC
Friday, 9 June 2006, 9:23 am
QUOTE
what are the new rules? Seriously, how come they don't take down the NeoCON and lobby sites that threaten the world?
If that's the case , why wasn't PNAC the first to be shut down!
Why, why, why?
People like the PNAC aren't threatening the government and corporate elite. They are a think tank that makes recommendations for foreign policy. Reccomendations that harm other nations, not ours. (According to them). Everything they publish is dressed up as promoting "American Values
TM Abroad". Their manifesto is called "Rebuilding America's Defenses". The feds aren't going to go after anyonme like that. It's free speech and not a threat to them.
If it's free speech and
is a threat to them, because they.... oh say.... I dunno.... expose their lies, cronyism, and corruption, then
you become a target for investigation/intimidation. It isn't about national security. It's about security of the power of the ruling and corporate elite. That's why environmental groups and Grannies Against the War are under surveillance and investgation. That's why prominent activists are on the no fly list. That's why the category for "eco-terrorist" was created. Are environmental activists a threat to national security if they torch a construction site or are they a threat to the developers profits?
And that's why we have to be careful with what we say here. One single reason for them to get the ball rolling on us and they can shut us down. Just on
suspicion. The suspicion of terrorism removes your civil liberties. Under the Patriot act, a terrorist is defined as "someone who
appears to be intended to alter government or public policy by an illegal means dangerous to human life". So if someone is
suspected of appearing to be intending to do something, you can be stripped of your personal rights, property, held in secret detention, spied on without a warrant, held without legal counsel indefinately, etc etc etc.
Get it?
All it takes is one little threat of violence or criminal behavior.