This is too damn funny...and waaay too good to pass up:
Guess what Ann Coulter's pimping now out of her website??
http://www.anncoulter.com/cbl.htm
That's right, folks..for a small $25 contribution to Annie's fund for gang-raping liberals and swarthy males....errrrrrrr, her Claire Boothe Luce Institute, you can now have the all new 2005 American Conservative Women Calendar!!
I'll just let Mrs. Coulter take in from there:
Full Version: For The Rightturd Who Has Almost Anything...
| QUOTE |
The Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute has published the very first calendar highlighting conservative women -- the 2005 Great American Conservative Women Calendar. Women featured in the calendar include Ann Coulter, Dr. Condoleezza Rice, Phyllis Schlafly, Michelle Malkin, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, Dr. Jeane Kirkpatrick and other conservative women leaders. Each month has wonderful pictures and a thought-provoking quote. The calendar is available through the Institute's website, [deleted by me, since there's no need for POAC to give any support for these nutcases], for a $25 or more tax-deductible online contribution. |
What....Mona Charen was left out??? Outrageous!!!!!
I'm quite sure that the many young Conservative men will have plenty of wonderful masturbation sessiions..errrrrrrrrrrrrrr, paying tribute to these fine women who promote themselves for the cause quite well.
Of course, the pics of Condi kissing Dubya, Dr. Whore-a's old nude pic collection. Mistress Malkin's old essays calling young girls who show off too much skin (ala Christina Aguilera) "skanks", and Mrs. Schafly's old "bash the UN" and "preserve the Confederacy" speeches (I wonder whay Condi would think of those, anyway) will probably not be a part of that particular calendar....but still, you gotta be impressed with the lineup.
I wonder if POAC's ever thought of an "Outstanding Liberal Women" catalog..hmmm???
Anthony
Oh man...fancy Michelle Malkin calling anyone else a skank! Pot, meet kettle. This is the same woman, after all, who thinks internment camps are a good idea. (Say, doesn't she look a little Asian to you? She does to me. Who does she think they locked up? Those little yellow people all look alike to these thugs, y'know...)'Bina.
A "little" Asian, Bina?? Hell, Mistress Malkin could pass for a full blown Asian..why else is she such a tool of the Right???
Here's the original article, BTW, where she drops the "skank" line on Christina (this was way back when Aguilera had released her controversal "Drrty" video..that's the one which featured her gyrating in the background of a supposed Thai sex shop, if you will remember).
It was originally posted to the News and Opinion website on November 15, 2002, reposted in the right'turd Jewish News Review site
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin111502.asp
Here's the original article, BTW, where she drops the "skank" line on Christina (this was way back when Aguilera had released her controversal "Drrty" video..that's the one which featured her gyrating in the background of a supposed Thai sex shop, if you will remember).
It was originally posted to the News and Opinion website on November 15, 2002, reposted in the right'turd Jewish News Review site
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin111502.asp
| QUOTE |
Michelle Malkin "Look, Mama, she's naked!" I'm waiting in line at the newsstand with my very observant two-year-old daughter, and she is pointing to Rolling Stone magazine. On the cover is 21-year-old singer Christina Aguilera, sprawled on a red velvet blanket. She is wearing black leather boots, black nail polish, one studded bracelet, ratty hair extensions, and as my child has so innocently noted, nothing else. Aguilera's privates are strategically hidden behind a guitar; her backside is tastelessly, tritely, exposed. Wedding magazines still fill magazine The article lays bare all the silly, sordid details of Aguilera's new album (appropriately titled "Stripped"), her new hardcore music video (titled "Dirrty," with an extra "r" thrown in for, you know, edge) and her transformation from bubble-gum, Mickey Mouse Club member to foul-mouthed vixen. The young woman who once sweetly warbled the theme song to the Disney movie, "Mulan," now grunts and writhes in a thong and kneepads, thrusting herself onto every moving object in her way, while "singing" the following "lyrics:" Ah, dirrty (dirrty) Filthy (filthy) Nasty, you nasty (yeah) Too dirrty to clean my act up If you ain't dirrty You ain't here to party (woo!)" DJ's spinning (show your hands) Let's get dirrty (that's my jam) I need that, uh, to get me off Sweat until my clothes come off In a pathetic attempt to prove that this is not just a made-for-TV act, Aguilera has been spotted around New York City reenacting her "Dirrty" video in popular nightclubs. The New York Post's gossip page even launched a "Christina Aguilera Skank Watch," which tracked her recent visits to local stripclubs, where she "got lap dances" "fondled the breasts of a buxom stripper," and "was spotted cuddling with some sexy female friends at a "Drunk Love" party. "F*** the pretty," Aguilera retorts when asked by the Rolling Stone reporter about her tamer, younger years as a teen idol. "F*** the dessert -- where's the tequila?" she exclaims apropros of nothing. Aguilera's other favorite f-word is "flava." As in: "I want the boys with the flava." Explaining why she doesn't usually date "white boys," Aguilera expounds with faux ghetto flair: "He's got to have some flava and edge to him. I don't discriminate because of color. I actually dated my first one recently. I put some cream in my coffee." Flava lover Aguilera herself is paler than vanilla ice cream when not slathered in coffee-colored, self-tanning lotion. "I don't see anything wrong with being comfortable with my own skin," Aguilera snaps defensively, as she strikes another gangsta pose and shows off her ridiculous body piercings-which Rolling Stone has painstakingly diagrammed for the masses. As I am returning the trashy magazine to the newsstand rack, my toddler chirps in again: "Mama, where's her shirt?" I answer: "Her mama forgot to tell her to put one on." My daughter, naturally, has a follow-up question: "Well, where's her mama?!" That's exactly the question I ask myself whenever we encounter some young Aguilera look-a-like and her friends hanging out at the mall with their thong straps glittering out in the open, their hip-huggers succumbing perilously to the forces of gravity, their noses and eyebrows and tongues marred with metal, and their faces plastered with red light district makeup. Where were their mamas-and dadas-to teach them that slutty is not sexy? Gutter talk is for vagrants, not for young ladies who want respect from the world. Promiscuity isn't a sign of maturity. It's a sign of self-loathing. Being "comfortable in your own skin" doesn't require having to bare every last inch of it in public. From Madonna, to Britney and Christina, to the under-dressed teens at the mall, legions of girls have been raised to believe that letting it all hang out is the only true path to womanhood. Christina Aguilera is a sad symptom of this cultural zeitgeist. Stripped of her inhibitions and sense of self-restraint, it's much too late for mama to put her peep-show-profiteering daughter's shirt back on. This naked truth cannot be disguised: The era of radical feminist sexual liberation has produced a generation of shameless skanks. |
And here's a nice and pithy response to Malkin's madness from libertarian G Beato (taken from his blog) that blows her myths off the map.
http://www.soundbitten.com/archives/week_2..._17.html#000091
| QUOTE |
The Naked and the Brain-Dead November 15, 2002 First rule of punditry: when you start taking editorial cues from your two-year-old child, it's time for a long vacation. Or at least a nap. Exhibit A: Mistress Malkin's latest exercise in celebrity navel-ring-gazing. The synopsis: While shopping with her daughter, Mistress Malkin spies an issue of Rolling Stone sporting a nude Christina Aguilera on the cover. Mistress Malkin thinks Aguilera is a skank. Mistress Malkin thinks lots of teenage girls are skanks. Mistress Malkin blames radical feminism for this widespread skankitude. Now, let's take a closer look. "Aguilera's privates are strategically hidden behind a guitar," Mistress Malkin exclaims in the essay's second paragraph. "[H]er backside is tastelessly, tritely, exposed." Apparently, Mistress Malkin views the world through a pair of ass-tinted glasses: see for yourself exactly how "exposed" Aguilera's backside is in the photograph Mistress Malkin is describing. It also sounds like Mistress Malkin gets that top-secret MTV channel, MTV-X. Because it's only available to A-List conservative pundits like Mistress Malkin and Bill O'Reilly, I've never actually seen it, but it sounds pretty good. While the standard version of Aguilera's new "Dirrty" video features about as much skin as an episode of WWE Smackdown! and the sort of narcissistic air-humping that inevitably leads to, well, even more narcissistic air-humping, Mistress Malkin describes the version she apparently viewed as "hardcore." Or maybe she's just lying. The true mark of power, of course, is to insist that 2 + 2 = 5 and make people believe it. In any case, Christina does not measure up to Mistress Malkin's stern standards, and that makes Mistress Malkin very, very angry. As she verbally abuses the naughty young singer, calling her "sordid" and "pathetic" and "foul-mouthed" and "ridiculous," Mistress Malkin's desire for control is palpable. She wants to dictate exactly who Christina fucks. She wants to decide how Christina dresses. She wants to regulate how Christina expresses herself. She yearns to give the skanky little vixen a good old-fashioned spanking on her tastelessly, tritely, exposed backside and turn her back into "the young woman who once sweetly warbled the theme song to the Disney movie, Mulan." But as Mistress Malkin works herself into a buttoned-down, pent-up lather repeating Christina's dirty lyrics and quoting the New York Post's reports of Christina's naughty lesbian-lite shenanigans, it's pretty clear what's going on here: Miss Aguilera, wily sexual predator that she is, is topping from the bottom, forcing Mistress Malkin to write about lap dances and fondling buxom stripper-breasts... And when she induces Mistress Malkin to write "F***" twice in the span of two sentences, Mistress Malkin almost melts down completely. But then, as if to regain some semblance of control, the flustered conservatrix blurts out another lie, this time describing a Christina quote as "apropos of nothing" when, if you read the article it comes from, it's clearly apropos of something - an earlier Rolling Stone about Jennifer Love Hewitt. For the next two paragraphs, a flushed and disoriented Mistress Malkin stumbles through some odd non-sequiturs about Christina's skin color. While it seems that Christina is somewhat confused about her own racial identity ("I guess we have to have one white person in it," she says in the Rolling Stone article, about a dancer auditioning for her video), Mistress Malkin exaggerates Christina's whiteness just as much as Christina exaggerates her non-whiteness. "Flava lover Aguilera herself is paler than vanilla ice cream when not slathered in coffee-colored, self-tanning lotion," taunts Malkin, and one is left to wonder: is the phrase "coffee-colored" a subtle dig at Christina's not particularly visible Hispanic heritage? A boasting reference to Mistress Malkin's own gorgeous, naturally coffee-colored hue? Or both? After that bit of weirdness, things get even weirder. Mistress Malkin writes: "I don't see anything wrong with being comfortable with my own skin," Aguilera snaps defensively, as she strikes another gangsta pose and shows off her ridiculous body piercings - which Rolling Stone has painstakingly diagrammed for the masses. Why is this weird? Because that quote doesn't actually appear in either the the online version of the article, or in the print version. It does appear in an AP article, however, but Malkin never cites it as a source - instead, she makes it sound as if it appears in the Rolling Stone article that she's reading at the newsstand. Also, there's nothing in either article about Christina striking any sort of "gangsta pose" while discussing her piercings. It's possible, of course, that Mistress Malkin is using the phrase in a metaphorical sense rather than to describe an actual physical pose, but are body-piercings generally associated with gangsta fashion? In the universe I inhabit (which I realize may not be the surreal realm Mistress Malkin presides over), they have their roots in punk and goth fashion... Also, it's worth pointing out that while Mistress Malkin assesses quotes that don't actually appear in the Rolling Stone article, she fails to mention why Christina gets what Mistress Malkin dismisses as "ridiculous body-piercings": because, Christina says, they make her "feel a little more strong or empowered." Even more importantly, Malkin fails to cite the relatively lengthy section of the article that details Christina's troubled relationship with her father, who apparently used to physically abuse Christina's mom, and on at least one occasion, Christina herself. Instead, Mistress Malkin simply writes the following: As I am returning the trashy magazine to the newsstand rack, my toddler chirps in again: "Mama, where's her shirt?" I answer: "Her mama forgot to tell her to put one on." Did you get that? Mistress Malkin returned the magazine to the newsstand rack! That means that while she was standing there reading the article, she was presumably taking notes on it, because there are several Christina quotes in Mistress Malkin's piece that she records with complete accuracy. I'm not quite sure why I think this is so funny, but every time I picture Mistress Malkin at the newsstand line, reading the Rolling Stone article and taking notes on it and keeping her two-year-old daughter in tow, I get a good laugh... Alas, this passage also offers a distressing glimpse at Mistress Malkin's conception of motherhood: indoctrinate your children with your values so forcefully that they will continue to do exactly what you tell them to do, even if they turn into 21-year-old multimillionaire divas. And finally: what about Dad? While Mistress Malkin chastises Christina's mom for her adult daughter's decisions, she has no stern words for Mr. Aguilera... Now, when she moves on to admonishing not just Christina but all the dirty young vixens "hanging out at the mall with their thong straps glittering out in the open, their hip-huggers succumbing perilously to the forces of gravity, their noses and eyebrows and tongues marred with metal, and their faces plastered with red light district makeup," Mistress Malkin does briefly succumb to the forces of parity and give a quick finger-wag to the "dadas" as well as the moms. But she abandons that tack pretty quickly, in order to dress down the dressed-down harlots directly: Gutter talk is for vagrants, not for young ladies who want respect from the world. Promiscuity isn't a sign of maturity. It's a sign of self-loathing. Being "comfortable in your own skin" doesn't require having to bare every last inch of it in public. There it is in a nutshell: the core philosophy underlying Mistress Malkin's School for Young Ladies, and it makes you wonder if the anti-American pundit truly understands why we're spending billions of dollars to battle Islamist terrorists who believe that suicide is foreplay and dead virgins are preferable to actual women: it's not to curtail free speech, or to teach young ladies that enjoying sex means hating yourself, or to trade in hip-huggers for burkas. Indeed, nubile 21-year olds who love sex and swear like a longshoreman with Tourettes syndrome are one of the many things that makes this country great. And Mistress Malkin's attempts to suggest otherwise simply mark her as a meddling, blue-nosed traitor, a petty Bin Laden determined to make America a little less free. |
Allow me to pause here to give a standing ovation for that.
| QUOTE |
And believe it or not, I haven't even gotten to the most egregious part of Mistress Malkin's essay; she saves that for last, concluding that "This naked truth cannot be disguised: The era of radical feminist sexual liberation has produced a generation of shameless skanks." Or to put it another way, Playboy used to be a fusty, highbrow magazine devoted to theater criticism. And Hustler specialized in entrepreneurial advice. But then Betty Friedan and Kate Millett gave Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt the go-ahead, and things started changing. Next, Gloria Steinem revealed that only boob jobs would allow women to achieve economic parity. And then Andrea Dworkin started arguing that ass cleavage was actually the best way to subvert the phallocentric hegemony. And after that, Naomi Wolf started exclaiming that uptight bitches who can't suck a bowling ball through a cocktail straw will never experience true self-esteem, and that fat thighs are really just the Goddess's way of saying, "Fuck you, you dirty cow whore!" And 2 + 2 = 5. |
I wonder what nude photos are behind Malkin's closets.
Anthony
Well, I know what "Dr." Laura has in hers, and a more pathetically unflattering set of nude shots would be hard to find.
And pray tell me, how did radical feminism create this? The impression I get is that all this "Dirrty" business is just a finger-salute to all that. Certainly I can't count on Ms. Malkin to elucidate as to how the one led to the other. She doesn't. She simply assumes that sexual empowerment and mere shock value somehow go together like a horse and carriage (newsflash, mama: THEY DON'T!!!)
I guess, though, that she'd be more than happy to use all Christina's piercings as string-loops to tie her genitals shut.
'Bina.
And pray tell me, how did radical feminism create this? The impression I get is that all this "Dirrty" business is just a finger-salute to all that. Certainly I can't count on Ms. Malkin to elucidate as to how the one led to the other. She doesn't. She simply assumes that sexual empowerment and mere shock value somehow go together like a horse and carriage (newsflash, mama: THEY DON'T!!!)
I guess, though, that she'd be more than happy to use all Christina's piercings as string-loops to tie her genitals shut.
'Bina.
hey, i thought dr. laura was sexy back in her day... she was all sure of herself back then with her big pubes and lil boobs... before she met jesus, er, sorry, forgot she became reacquainted with yaweh.
a calendar for conservative men is about as sexy as a calender for conservative men... after all, that is what being conservative is all about. being bitter because you are atrociously unattractive... and trying to impose your acrid insecurities on the rest of the passionate world.
money is NO substitute for damn good sex.
a calendar for conservative men is about as sexy as a calender for conservative men... after all, that is what being conservative is all about. being bitter because you are atrociously unattractive... and trying to impose your acrid insecurities on the rest of the passionate world.
money is NO substitute for damn good sex.
| QUOTE |
| Dr. Laura Loses Her Religion Radio Host Drops Judaism, 'Envies' Christian Friends By LISA KEYS FORWARD STAFF With 12 million Americans tuning in daily, controversial syndicated radio-show host Laura Schlessinger — known to all as "Dr. Laura" — is arguably the best-known Orthodox Jew in the United States. Rather, she was. In a shocking if little-noticed revelation, Schlessinger — who very publicly converted to Judaism five years ago — opened "The Dr. Laura Schlessinger Program" on August 5 with the confession that she will no longer practice Judaism. Although Schlessinger said she still "considers" herself Jewish, "My identifying with this entity and my fulfilling the rituals, etc., of the entity — that has ended." And with that, Orthodox Judaism lost its loudest mouthpiece and its most prominent "rabbi," as it were, with the largest American pulpit — with the exception of, perhaps, presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman. Syndicated nationally since 1994, Schlessinger has won over listeners with her hard-edged advice and razor-sharp tongue. Yet her brash style, not to mention her espousal of a strict "moral health" code — including controversial condemnations of homosexuality as "a biological error" — put her at odds with wide swaths of the Jewish community. Many found her moralist, black-and-white, you're-with-me-or- against-me stance to be more representative of Evangelical Christians than of Jews, who were often among her most outspoken critics. Nonetheless, even Schlessinger's detractors were shocked by the news. "I can't tell you how significant this is," said fellow Jewish media star and "Kosher Sex" author Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, who has sparred with Schlessinger over her comments on homosexuality. "Dr. Laura always equated her morals and ethics with Jewish morals and ethics. That placed the American Jewish community in a real fix; on the one hand, she made Judaism very popular, on the other, she made it vilified and hated by many people." "I think Judaism is better off not being saddled and directly associated with Dr. Laura's means," he said, adding, "although she is still a Jew." Schlessinger's office said she was unavailable for comment. Schlessinger began her August 5 program by noting that, prior to each broadcast, she spends an hour reading faxes from fans and listeners. "By and large the faxes from Christians have been very loving, very supportive," she said. "From my own religion, I have either gotten nothing, which is 99% of it, or two of the nastiest letters I have gotten in a long time. I guess that's my point — I don't get much back. Not much warmth coming back." Schlessinger even hinted at a possible turn to Christianity — a move that, radio insiders say, would elevate her career far beyond the 300 stations that currently syndicate her show. "I have envied all my Christian friends who really, universally, deeply feel loved by God," she said. "They use the name Jesus when they refer to God... that was a mystery, being connected to God." |
-t-
I wonder if the Laura Schlesinger one will have the ones spread online. I can only imagine what kind of sick bastards would jump all over that one. 
What a pillar of morality. That puts her even below Billy Bennett's and O'Reilly's level in my book.
What a pillar of morality. That puts her even below Billy Bennett's and O'Reilly's level in my book.
Warning: If it hurts when you laugh, do NOT read further...
http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2004/12/2...irls/print.html
http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2004/12/2...irls/print.html
| QUOTE |
| Still looking for last-minute gift ideas? Consider the inaugural printing of the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute's Great American Conservative Women 2005 wall calendar. Perhaps inspired by last year's Babes Against Bush calendar, the Luce Institute decided to print the calendar, according to spokeswoman Audrey Mullen, "because they have a lot of really terrific women in their speakers' bureau and who support the Policy Institute. They want to get the message out there that there are some terrific conservative women who are also great role models for young women [and who] are not what you see promoted in the media generally." The Luce Institute draws a pretty hard line on the kind of women it thinks are "promoted in the media generally." The institute's Web site features archived articles that refer to Hillary Rodham Clinton as a "Senate diva"; celebrate "Spin Sisters," Myrna Blyth's attack on the liberal women's media; and argue that Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day is a "stealth feminist holiday" that "victimizes sons and daughters." There's also a piece about the National Organization for Women called "They Should Call it THEN" and a report on Gloria Steinem's 2000 wedding to the since deceased David Bale, charitably headlined: "A Fish Gets a Bicycle." So you cannot accuse these people of being humorless. Which could explain the calendar, which features 12 conservative chicks in full Talbots finery. The calendar, which can be purchased through the institute's Web site for a $25 donation, is being given away free at institute events, to servicemen and women and on college campuses. Don't hurt yourself while picturing a photo of Jeanne Kirkpatrick hanging on a dorm room wall next to a glossy poster of "O.C." heartthrob Benjamin McKenzie. The 2005 calendar year kicks off with an image of Luce herself. The journalist, editor, congresswoman from Connecticut and ambassador to Italy is quoted as saying, "Do one thing well. You can have it all, but you will be very tired." Star Parker, a former welfare mother who, according to the calendar, "reformed her life, received a degree in marketing, and launched an urban Christian magazine," graces February. March belongs to a smiling Christina Hoff Sommers, author of "Who Stole Feminism?" and "The War Against Boys." The calendar quotes her embrace of the phallus: "It is unfashionable to say so but I will say it anyway: The energy, adventurousness, stoicism, and competitiveness of normal, decent males is responsible for much of what is right in the world."Ronald Reagan's treasurer Bay Buchanan comes next and says, "I go to college campuses. I talk to these young women, as brave a people I've ever met, who have spoken out on their college campuses ... They're chastised, they're ostracized, they are literally jeered. They go up before their student bodies and the feminists show up and are screaming at them. This is on these wonderful campuses that are supposed to be for freedom of speech." (Surely it's not because they're just plain fucking DITZES?)This is Buchanan's entire calendar quotation, taken from a 2001 speech at the institute's Conservative Leadership Seminar. This may be just the sound of another chastising feminist, but who is she talking about here? Who are "these young women" who are getting "literally jeered"? One calendar denizen who has surely been jeered by feminists is May dreamboat, radio shrink and famed gay-hater Dr. Laura (Schlesinger). She appears, all dimples, with a helmet of straw-colored hair that seems to glow seraphically. "I deeply disdain the feminists for what they have done to generations of women and to children who pay the price of lost, intact, loving stable homes with married committed moms and dads," Dr. Laura is quoted as saying. She is surely gratified that feminists disdain her right back. June brings us lawyer, columnist, Eagle Forum founder, ERA buzz-kill and all-around good-time girl Phyllis Schlafly, who is followed in July by thin political pundit Ann Coulter. August's Michelle Malkin, a conservative columnist, says, "When liberals won't clam up about their sordid sex lives and we object, they call us rude. When liberal women raise their voices, they are praised as 'passionate.' When conservative women raise their voices, we are condemned as 'shrill.'" Well, if it walks like a whistle and talks like a whistle ... Back-to-school September features the country's most powerful black woman, Oprah! Kidding. It's Condi. Unfortunately, the calendar must have been printed too late to catch her promotion to secretary of state, since she is listed as national security advisor. The best part of Condoleezza Rice's page is the smaller secondary photo, supplied by the White House, showing her with Dick Cheney in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center on 9/11, conferring by phone with President Bush, presumably from the presidential emergency "Get me the fuck out of here" plane. Likable pundit Monica Crowley is next, but she's totally overpowered by November's Jeanne Kirkpatrick. A Leavey professor of government at Georgetown and senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Kirkpatrick was the first woman appointed to serve as a permanent representative of the U.S. to the United Nations. She is quoted as saying, "People have often said to me, what did I do that was the most interesting thing in my life. The answer is having a baby ... Having and raising babies is more interesting than making speeches at the United Nations. Believe me." Especially the spitting up. (Was anyone ever LESS fitted to represent a country to the UN, anyway???)Clare Boothe Luce was a journalist, and so it's only fitting that the calendar that bears her name have a great kicker. And by God, it does, in December, when it features gun rights advocate Shemane Nugent, wife of Ted, and coauthor with her husband of a book called "Kill It & Grill It." She is quoted as defending the Second Amendment, and the smaller picture shows "Ted and Shemane Nugent with their teen son, Rocco, at their ranch in Texas." In camos. All holding machine guns. Happy holidays! |
And try not to throw up, willya? Especially at this:
I'm sorry, people, but the vertigo from all the spin is killing me. "Great American" and "conservative women" just do NOT go together!
'Bina.
Now..where do I freakin' begin??
First off...Star Parker in February??? Gee, I thought that "conservatives" opposed Black History Month as a "leftist radical holiday"...and shouldn't Condi get that nod, anyway due to her higher rank and stature??
Then...Why Mistress Malkin and not, say, Mona Charen or Jane Parshall or Kathleen Parker or any other right-wing talk host windbag??? Or maybe they need to meet their Latino quota, too??
And then there's Dr. Whore-a....errrrrrr, Dr. Laura...<sigh>..enough said on that.
And what in the hell did July do to deserve Annie the Wicked Bitch as its covergirl??
And finally, Shemane Nugent (wifey of Ted)....who's she?? A hologram invented by her hubby when he's not firing arrows at liberals???
Oh, yeah...$12 is more than worth the value of hanging these beauties on your wall...sure it is.
Anthony
First off...Star Parker in February??? Gee, I thought that "conservatives" opposed Black History Month as a "leftist radical holiday"...and shouldn't Condi get that nod, anyway due to her higher rank and stature??
Then...Why Mistress Malkin and not, say, Mona Charen or Jane Parshall or Kathleen Parker or any other right-wing talk host windbag??? Or maybe they need to meet their Latino quota, too??
And then there's Dr. Whore-a....errrrrrr, Dr. Laura...<sigh>..enough said on that.
And what in the hell did July do to deserve Annie the Wicked Bitch as its covergirl??
And finally, Shemane Nugent (wifey of Ted)....who's she?? A hologram invented by her hubby when he's not firing arrows at liberals???
Oh, yeah...$12 is more than worth the value of hanging these beauties on your wall...sure it is.
Anthony
And oh, BTW.."Babes Against Bush" still kicks ass. 
Indeed, I'd put Lisa Boyle (who I adored as a softcore actress for quite a while) up against Annie Bitch any day....indeed, there are several of the finest women in the B-movie genre with more than enough brains to match...and could still drop a total ass-whuppin on any one of those right'urds anytime.
http://www.babesagainstbush.com
Anthony
Indeed, I'd put Lisa Boyle (who I adored as a softcore actress for quite a while) up against Annie Bitch any day....indeed, there are several of the finest women in the B-movie genre with more than enough brains to match...and could still drop a total ass-whuppin on any one of those right'urds anytime.
http://www.babesagainstbush.com
Anthony
Yeah, Babes Against Bush were definitely the better crew. Too bad their website is now an apology for the Great Theft of '04... <sigh>
'Bina.
<sigh>'Bina.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.