Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: A Tail of... Wagging the Dog
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Media
Max-1
LiNk
QUOTE
ABC Suspends Producer Over Bush-Bashing E-Mail


By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, April 1, 2006; C01




ABC News suspended the executive producer of the weekend edition of "Good Morning America" yesterday over a pair of leaked e-mails in which he used inflammatory language to slam President Bush and Madeleine Albright.

John Green, whose unpaid suspension will last one month, apologized to the White House in a call to communications director Nicolle Wallace, while two ABC executives called the former secretary of state to apologize.

"No one is sorrier than John for the embarrassment that these albeit private e-mails caused to his colleagues and to the people who were the subjects of those comments," said ABC News spokesman Jeffrey Schneider. "John would be the first to say this has been a real lesson to him. John is abjectly sorry for all the comments that have come to light, and that's appropriate."

In one of the e-mails, written during the first presidential debate in 2004 and leaked to the Drudge Report, Green wrote to a colleague on his BlackBerry: "Are you watching this? Bush makes me sick. If he uses the 'mixed messages' line one more time, I'm going to puke."(WHA WHAA WHAAA??? And that's inflamitory?)

Green, who was not made available for comment yesterday, wrote his colleagues after that leak to say "how much I regret the embarrassment that this story causes ABC. It was an inappropriate thing to say, and I'm deeply sorry."

Wallace said yesterday that she "appreciated the call and the apology."

The second leaked e-mail surfaced Thursday on the New York Post's gossipy Page Six. In that note, Green wrote that Albright should not be booked on the show because "Albright has Jew shame."

Albright, who was raised as a Roman Catholic, acknowledged her Jewish heritage in 1997 after it was discovered by Washington Post reporter Michael Dobbs in the course of researching a book.

Green wrote in that note that "she hates us anyway because she says we promised her five minutes and only gave her two . . . I do not like her." An ABC insider said Green was reacting to a heated dispute between Albright and a network producer.(O.K. His personal and private e-mail was a bit slanted, but still... PRIVATE)

The Albright Group, a global strategy firm founded by the former Clinton cabinet member, took the diplomatic route. "Secretary Albright has always had an excellent relationship with 'GMA' and with ABC and she still does," her office said in a statement. "In fact, she looks forward to appearing on 'GMA' on May 2 in connection with the release of her book on U.S. foreign policy and the importance of religious tolerance."

Both e-mails were disclosed at a time when public distrust of news organizations and their ability to be fair are at or near an all-time high.

The suspension was ordered by Kerry Marash, senior vice president for editorial standards, and approved by ABC News President David Westin.

Green, who got his job in 2004 as the Saturday and Sunday editions of the morning show were being launched, has worked for ABC for 12 years. He is highly regarded by many of his colleagues, and the show is in second place on Saturdays, trailing NBC's "Weekend Today," but is in third place on Sundays, when "CBS Sunday Morning" is No. 1.

It is widely believed at ABC News that the e-mails were leaked by a former employee who has a vendetta against Green.

"Everyone who works at ABC News is unhappy with the situation because it reflects on all of us," Schneider said. But, he said, "I don't think the e-mails tell us anything about the show John Green was putting on the air every Saturday and Sunday, which is fair and balanced and down the middle."
blink.gif

wiretapthisDMW
Sooooooooo, just for arguments sake, people in journalism aren't allowed to have private opinions; under penalty of suspension...that is unless their private opinion is loving Bush!
yankhadenuf
QUOTE(wiretapthisDMW @ Saturday, 1 April 2006, 10:35 am) [snapback]50480[/snapback]

Sooooooooo, just for arguments sake, people in journalism aren't allowed to have private opinions; under penalty of suspension...that is unless their private opinion is loving Bush!



That's the way I read it too, Tap!
I don't get it > where are all the suspended privately Bush-loving journalists? huh.gif
wiretapthisDMW
QUOTE(yankhadenuf @ Saturday, 1 April 2006, 12:56 pm) [snapback]50489[/snapback]

That's the way I read it too, Tap!
I don't get it > where are all the suspended privately Bush-loving journalists? huh.gif


Probably suspended under Bush's desk, the only deep-throat journalism he allows. (dang im surly today)
LOL
yankhadenuf
QUOTE(wiretapthisDMW @ Saturday, 1 April 2006, 1:05 pm) [snapback]50490[/snapback]

Probably suspended under Bush's desk, the only deep-throat journalism he allows....


Please let it be true... that's impeachable offense , ya know! wink.gif
Max-1
QUOTE(wiretapthisDMW @ Saturday, 1 April 2006, 10:05 am) [snapback]50490[/snapback]

Probably suspended under Bush's desk, the only deep-throat journalism he allows.
See now,
Diane. I knew I could count on ya for a good 'ole blow-job joke. tongue.gif


LiNk
QUOTE
The Fear Is In the Room: Inside Our Unbrave Media World
March 27, 2006
By Danny Schechter
Source: MediaChannel.org


NEW YORK, March 27: There is a scene in the movie "Good Night and Good Luck" about an outbreak of insecurity that nearly ended the late CBS News legend’s broadcast challenge to red-hunting Senator Joe McCarthy before it aired.

A few hours before the historic moment that demonstrated that newscasters can take on demagogic politicians and deceptive policies, Edward R. Murrow’s colleagues were having second thoughts.

One pointed out that McCarthy would likely lash back. Another worried that the program would be seen as a mere gesture and would accomplish nothing. A third wondered if it was worth jeopardizing the show and CBS News by going after such a high-profile figure so forcefully.

Murrow listened with growing despair at timidity packaged as pragmatism.

Each of his colleagues were loyal to him and were key members of his team. He needed them, just as much as they wanted to assure his survival in a corporate environment easily pressured by government and sponsors.

When it was his turn to speak, Murrow spoke of the fear that McCarthyism had instilled in society. "That fear," he said," is now in this room."

At that given time, and in that environment, the Murrow team was brave enough to go forward, just as George Clooney and his team were brave enough to make a movie to remind us that a free press must be both independent and unafraid.

Look around and you will see how unbrave our media has become in this era of mega-media and paranoid politics when the dominant emotion in most newsrooms is one of anxiety driven by bottom line pressure.

Media executives and journalists are terrified of stepping out of line, being misunderstood, or having themselves thought to be too strident (i.e. opinionated).

As I discovered during eight years toiling inside ABC News, 20/20, most media professionals have an internal radar to guide them against stepping over real but unwritten rules of what you can or can not get away with.

It is this radar that produces so much of the self-censorship that makes for bland news and middle-of-the road conformist reporting, safe, not sorry, is the guideline many follow. The news culture's rule of thumb being: stay in line or walk the unemployment line.

It is this climate that makes it nearly impossible to have a frank discussion with news managers - as my partner Rory O'Connor experienced when he submitted MediaChannel readers' questions to CNN President Jon Klein who sidestepped most of them, retreating into old saws and banalities about getting the facts and being objective.

And there is also a fear that if you stick your head up, to voice your opinions, it can get chopped off. That’s what happened to MSNBC’s Ashleigh Banfield when she dared suggest in a university talk that Iraq war coverage was sanitized. Her contract with NBC was not renewed. Many well-known journalists have been punished for their mistakes, indiscretions and minor screw-ups.

It can happen to broadcasters on the right as well as journos who appear to be anti-war. The Guardian reports that, "An American radio station has sacked a talk show host who used a racial slur in connect with the U. S. Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. In a slip of the tongue, Dave Lenihan, a presenter for KTRS radio, in St. Louis, Missouri, used the word 'coon' while arguing live on air that Rice should become the next commissioner of the National Football League."

Lenihan's exact words were: "She's got the patent resumé of somebody that has serious skill. She loves football, she's African-American, which would be kind of a big coon." He added: "Oh my God - I totally, totally, totally, totally am sorry for that. I didn't mean that." He later told a local television news channel he had meant to say "coup." The general manager of KTRS, Tim Dorsey apologized to Rice and listeners, adding: "It was a most unfortunate racial slur. There can be no excuse for what was said."

As a former radio newscaster who at times suffered from bobbling words, I am prepared to believe Lenihan’s apology -- but in an era of political and patriotic correctness, there is little tolerance for slips that may be viewed as slurs (unless it is Bill O’Reilly who makes them!).

When CNN's Eason Jordan spoke at an off-the-record session at the World Economic Forum and suggested that journalists were targeted by the U.S. Military in Iraq, the confidentiality of the session was violated by a blogger who created a storm of criticisms against him that led to charges that CNN was "sliming" the troops. Jordan was forced out of his job after 25 years.

More recently, The Drudge Report got hold of an ABC producer’s private email. A personal opinion was soon being turned into an indictment of a whole network:

"A top producer at ABC NEWS declared 'Bush makes me sick' in an email obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT… John Green, currently executive producer of the weekend edition of GOOD MORNING AMERICA, unloaded on the president in an ABC company email obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT. 'If he uses the 'mixed messages'line one more time, I'm going to puke,' Green complained."

Drudge added: "The blunt comments by Green, along with other emails obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT, further reveal the inner workings of the nation's news outlets."

Does it really? Will ABC News now feature guests who will confess that Bush makes them sick? I doubt it. When it comes to the president, the critiques of most media insiders are likely to be confined to personal communications and occasional on-campus presentations. Otherwise, wise news lips are likely to stay sealed.

A new book, "Lap Dogs," out soon, will detail how most of the nation’s news outlets cozied up to the Bush Administration with barely a negative word on its policies. The press, like the CIA, practices "group think."

Bravery is not a strong point or professional quality that leads to the upward mobility fast track.

You can be sure that this latest Drudge exploitation of a private email will further chill free speech within the "free press." Edward R. Murrow noted years ago, "the fear is in the room;" it is still very much with us.


-- News Dissector Danny Schechter is the editor of Mediachannel.org, His latest books are When News Lies and The Death of Media. His most recent film is Weapons of Mass Deception.(Wmdthefilm.com)
Do not forget,
Who owns the MEDIA?
Who does the media serve?
What might be the purpose of the media's unwillingness to be forthcoming with actual facts?

yankhadenuf
QUOTE(Max-1 @ Saturday, 1 April 2006, 2:03 pm) [snapback]50493[/snapback]

...Do not forget,
Who owns the MEDIA?
Who does the media serve?
What might be the purpose of the media's unwillingness to be forthcoming with actual facts?


Just spotted this story over at ADS.org too... is there anything we can collectively do for Ashleigh?

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/9900
MasterMind
Oh damn I love free speech.
wiretapthisDMW
I do want to know just how the press gets a hold of private emails????

Are Blackberries, like cell phones being monitored by Big Brother?
tinfoilhat.gif
Max-1
QUOTE(wiretapthisDMW @ Saturday, 1 April 2006, 2:29 pm) [snapback]50534[/snapback]

I do want to know just how the press gets a hold of private emails????

Are Blackberries, like cell phones being monitored by Big Brother?
tinfoilhat.gif

Diane,
I read somwhere, and I may be incorrect, but one of the provisions in the P.A.II includes E-Mails.

I'll have to get back to ya, hopefully.

But I do know that the Administration is trying, if not already succeeded, to be able to track E-Mail addresses, sender/reciever.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.