TheVinegarTaster
Wednesday, 15 February 2006, 11:37 pm
QUOTE(rcorporon @ Wednesday, 15 February 2006, 7:03 pm) [snapback]43941[/snapback]
There's a lot here, but let me see if I get this right. Some people, the mentally unstable kind, may need church groups to get their lives together.
For some, church groups can be
one option of many, yes.
QUOTE
Well, there are groups dedicated to helping people that are not affiliated with the church, and I would offer that these are a much better option.
That value judgement is something I don't think can be made on behalf of someone else. While there are certainly excellent secular groups available to those who are lost, I would maintain that the group that successfully liberates someone from a destructive situation has demonstrated their value. Non-secular groups are often able to do this as well as secular.
QUOTE
My point is that there is help for those who need it, and it can be found outside of a church.
No argument. Were it my choice I would not choose a religios organization. There are those, however, for whom a religious group resonates.
Can you stand another personal story? You know my uncle, the mayor of small town Oregon? His wife, who is a wonderful woman, was diagnosed three years ago with anorexia/bulimia, which is a growing problem in pre-menopausal women. She was considered unretrievable by two clinics specializing in treatment of late-onset anorexia. A deeply religious woman, when these two clinics failed, she and my uncle went against the family's wishes and sent her to a church-based anorexia treatment facility in Arizona. She was there 9 months, but came home in recovery. Though she continues to fight, she is now at normal weight, and is winning the battle that she will fight the rest of her life. I don't begin to understand why the religious nature of the treatment solidified her commitment to recovery, but she was more ammenable to the religious overtones than with the secular approach taken bu the previous doctors. I don't like religion, but I cannot argue that it has had a profoundly positive impact on both my aunt and uncle.
I do not for one moment mean to imply that religious groups are for everyone, or are always beneficial, but neither can it be said that they are all bad, as evidenced by members of my family.
I want to be very clear, too, that I do not believe for a moment that it was the act of a higher power that rescued my relatives, though both will tell you otherwise. I believe that the religious message for some reason resonates with them, making it possible for them to self heal in a way that a secular treatment did not. Religion reaches them. I can't argue with that.
QUOTE
I would argue that if help comes with the kind of strings / brainwashing that comes with church help, then it's not worth it.
Certainly in the case of my aunt, the alternative to the religious brainwashing was likely death. I think hers was the better choice.
QUOTE
I do not want to sound like an asshole, so please don't think that I'm insulting or attacking your uncle in any way. What he did was amazing, and I'm happy to hear that he turned his life around.
I found nothing offensive in any of your statements, Scorp. What the hell is happening to us with this getting along thing we've suddenly discovered?!?
QUOTE
But you mention that his church addiction is better than his drug one. On the surface, I'd agree. But both have some heavy side effects, and the chuch addiciton is all the more sinister because its effects are much more subtle.
I can't argue with this, and I don't pretend to be wholly comfortable with my aunt 'sand unble's attachment to church dogma and the potentially insidious effects. Religion was a means of recovery for both of them, however, and both are happy, healthy, productive members of the community as measured by any generally accepted metric. This convinces me that religion cannot be painted as all bad.
QUOTE
...I think that willingly allowing yourself to be told what to think / do is terrible, and if you are so willing to give up your own mind and thoughts, then you deserve whatever ills the church feeds you later on.
I, too think it terrible, but that is
our perception/experience, Scorp. I know many intelligent, well-adjusted people whose experience says otherwise, validating Sky's repeated statement that the value of religion is determined by the individual. It ain't for me, and it ain't for you, but I am grateful it was there when my relatives needed it.