Well, it looks like the Bush administration is having some success in destroying the trail of pictures of Big Brother, I mean Bush, with Jack Abramoff.
Link to Story
Full Version: White House is Scrubbing Picture of Bush with Abramoff
QUOTE(shoeless @ Thursday, 26 January 2006, 8:37 pm) [snapback]41321[/snapback]
Well, it looks like the Bush administration is having some success in destroying the trail of pictures of Big Brother, I mean Bush, with Jack Abramoff.
Link to Story
They DO exist, and hopefully some enterprising photographer will make sure they're published. They've got to be very valuable!
Catherine
QUOTE(shoeless @ Thursday, 26 January 2006, 5:37 pm) [snapback]41321[/snapback]
Well, it looks like the Bush administration is having some success in destroying the trail of pictures of Big Brother, I mean Bush, with Jack Abramoff.
Link to Story
the page in question had disappeared from the site.
Just like every piece of expository evidence from Lieboy's life, poof; it disappears. Taken care of. His 3 DUI records, his girlfriend's abortion in 1971, his cocaine arrest and community service, his TANG records, 17 months of "military" records, people who disagree...bad bits just disappear. Mysteriously. It's a pattern.
Most secretive pResident ever. Hmmmmmm...I wonder why.
This time the pics will surface. Or there will be suicides.
This is the type of shit taht went on in the USSR under Stalin.
Go read this book:
Hella scary.
Go read this book:
Hella scary.
Apparently according to thing I have read, which I don't have the links to right now,
The NYT said their were images of Bush with Abramoff,
And it's Abramoff him self who has the pictures and informed the NYT about them,
but did not give them to the NYT to publish, which is why we have no pictures.
This to me is very interesting.
WHY would Abramoff wish to expose Bush?
WHY does it seem as though Abramoff was trying to make a deal?
WHY would Bush go to such lengths to distance himself from Abramoff?
WHY did the Bush administration spend so much effort LOOKING for images to destroy?
WHY did the NYT report the story on the word of an indicted and confessed liar, without the pictures?
Yes yes, there's a story here.
Red wine and old lovers?
(I have no idea what it means. I just made it up and it sounded cool)
The NYT said their were images of Bush with Abramoff,
And it's Abramoff him self who has the pictures and informed the NYT about them,
but did not give them to the NYT to publish, which is why we have no pictures.
This to me is very interesting.
WHY would Abramoff wish to expose Bush?
WHY does it seem as though Abramoff was trying to make a deal?
WHY would Bush go to such lengths to distance himself from Abramoff?
WHY did the Bush administration spend so much effort LOOKING for images to destroy?
WHY did the NYT report the story on the word of an indicted and confessed liar, without the pictures?
Yes yes, there's a story here.
Red wine and old lovers?
(I have no idea what it means. I just made it up and it sounded cool)
I agree Sky. Could you imagine the headlines if Clinton had tried to suppress the photos of him and Monyka? Yet the MSM today just kinda mentions it on the way side.
These pictures must show like him handing Bush a check or something. You know they love pics like that, so if he did give him a check he would take a pic of it.
These pictures must show like him handing Bush a check or something. You know they love pics like that, so if he did give him a check he would take a pic of it.
Did Abramoff have his own photographer? Did he just ask the white house photog for copies? Who took the pictures? Press corps? MSM?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.