He had the golden opportunity > did he simply blow it or is there a reason behind the obvious omission?

I think he left PNAC out of the movie because it is a topic for an entirely new movie. He could have easily used another 2 hours on the history of the neocon movement and the efforts of PNAC and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy in the world today.

I think it's about timing.


I understand that right now he's working on an outting of the pharmaceutical industry!

I think that the PNAC is an example of truth being much stranger than fiction. When I first heard about it, I didn't think it was real.

Even after I saw their site, I thought it was a joke.

Its so absurd, ti boggles the mind.

Micheal Moore is a tool. Plain and simple. he does what he is told to do.

Care to elaborate or give examples? Proof?

yeah! This should be very enlightening.
I always had the highest respect for Mr Moore.
Could I have been mistaken?

Very good, MM, you ARE a brilliant MasterMind (please accept my un-solicited compliments ! ) You have heard what I have heard to , and I am unfortunately beginning to suspect that it's true, because frankly, nothing else makes sense. Why did Michael Moore (not to be confused with MM ) so OBVIOUSLY leave out the OBVIOUS? Because he is a Zionist tool! Why else would he leave out the very pre-dominant factors that are played in the plot to the Iraq War?> PNAC, Neoconservatism, Israel, Zionism. But Americans can't handle the truth:

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3013

http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2004/09/16/10222

"..This charge, with its anti-Semitic tinge, confuses, as is all too often the case, Jewry and Zionism. Because Moore’s film, by the way, is a diatribe against the Bush administration, Washington’s support for Israel and its consequences are ignored, exactly because of the thoroughly bipartisan character of that backing..."


I'm afraid the TRUTH will never come out in so-called "polite circles" of Hollywood, because you will automatically be labelled "Anti-Semetic". I believe Michael Moore was afraid of the anti-Semetic label, even though being anti-Zionist is not being anti-Jewish. I think Michael Moore was afraid to put PNAC in his film for fear that his film would not be backed and distributed by Hollywood if he did.

That is why I am so very proud of Barbra Streisand and the stand she took against the PNAC in her formal statement > she is a true American , just like Cindy Sheehan.

You can compare this situation to Ireland's troubles too... Cindy Sheehan, Irish-American, did not want her son Casey to die for Israel , and she would not want him to die for Ireland either.

The reason PNAC is not being reported in the American news, in Hollywood, etc... is because our nation is controlled by very powerful Zionists and the Fascists are in the White House. We are in a unique time in world history, not just American history> the Zionists are in CAHOOTS with the Fascists this time because of Neoconservatism !

The only nation our boys and girls should be dying for is America. (stepping down off soapbox now... whew )

Micheal Moore lets his fear control them. Bush uses this Fear as a weapon, hehe weaponized fear (I like the sound of that), he allows this fear to control him and the content of his works. Micheal Moore is not willing to even HELP the people in his hometown, but he sure did put them in his film to show how down rotten they have become.


The question was asked and I answered with my opinion. Since you believe the burden of proof is on those who disagree Sky, have it and disprove me.

But who do you believe Michael Moore is a tool for, MM? And is he a willing tool, or just trying to publish what he is able to so he doesn't get censored ?

I want to say he knows who is using him, but he just may very well not know. Many Americans are used every day and have no idea they are being used.

Who is using Michael Moore?

Imperialist, that go beyond US borders, People who want to expand NATO and combine USA with EU.

MM, Google : Task Force for North America > it's about potential "combining" of US, Canada and Mexico within their security AND economic communities by 2010. Yes, its already in the works :

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...?hub=TopStories

http://usinfo.state.gov/wh/Archive/2005/May/18-799399.html

http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/2005...60907-1435r.htm

http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=7914

When I hear terms like "Zionist tool" it reminds me of the days when we blamed the Jews for controlling the banks and media....

Great links Yank, but I think those are two different groups of Neo-Cons.

Zionism , not Jews... do you consider Neoconism and Americans to be the same as well , so if you are against Neoconism you are against yourself?
And since you are against PNAC & Neoconism, does that make you against Jews?
What about the Jews against Zionism ?

http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/

http://www.nkusa.org/

www.jewsagainstzionism.com

If Mr Moore is or is not someones passive or active tool,
the work he did with the Fahrenheit film was brilliant, and the timing was perfect!

I look forward to his expose' on the drug industry!

There is no doubt that Michael Moore is a good and decent human being who exposed more than anyone else . He is my hero, and I am forever in debt to him for giving me the wake-up call> but I found out about PNAC from John W Dean and Neil McKay, not Michael Moore> why? There must be a logical reason. The only one I can think of is that Mike was afraid of being totally censored by Hollywood moguls, so he censored himself partially instead.








Then Bush is puppet for both