TheVinegarTaster
Wednesday, 11 January 2006, 4:46 pm
QUOTE(AntiFlagWaver @ Wednesday, 11 January 2006, 1:58 pm)
I'm going to limit my reply for now to VT.
You say the process of correcting the corrupt path of the current administration has begun. This “corrupt path” involves so many areas, including Domestic Spying, The use of Torture, The Iraq War, “The WMD lie”, and corruption on a massive scale and at many levels. .... Instead what I see happening is that the US Govt may pretend to have addressed the issue, but in reality it goes on but much more in secret, so the American people are not aware of it. That is my perception.
There can certainly be no arguement that Bush and the Neo-Cons are hiding their corrupt activities to the best of their ability, and/or attempting to subvert legal interpretation to make their questionable acts legal, or at least make them seem legal. It has ever been thus with those who act outside of the law and/or accepted ethics, however. Such activities are never conducted in the light of day.
The Nixon scandal followed the same pattern as that being followed by the Bush administration; misrepresentation of a war and its underlying premise; illegal phone taps; attempts, through illegal action, to influence the outcome of an election; and while it seems the Bush administration may have advanced these corrupt practices further than Nixon was able (with both administrations relying on some of the same people who clearly learned to be more devious after the exposure of the Nixon scandal), the fact remains that the Bush corruption is being brought into the open and people are beginning to take note.
QUOTE
You say the questionable practices of the Bush Administration and the Neo-Cons are being investigated. Who is investigating them? How serious are they about investigating them? If they find wrong-doing, how hard will they push for change (or how much will “politics” prevent them from doing so)? How hard will the Administration and Pentagon resist those calls for change? What will continue in secrecy even after the administration and Pentagon has pledged to have made change(s)?
Come on, AFW; the Abramoff investigation, the Delay investigation, the Cunningham investigation, investigations into election fraud being spurred by the GAO, investigations into pre-war intelligence, investigations beginning into Bush spying on American citizens; all of these are the necessary first steps to bringing the Bush/Neo-Con corruption to light and prosecuting.
QUOTE
I think you are 100% incorrect in your implication that all of the wrong-doing of this administration will EVER be properly investigated by those with the power to do something about it and that the appropriate changes will be made to stop the abuses and to prevent them from ever happening again.
You're overstating my assertions, AFW. I neither implied nor stated that 100% of the bad guys were likely to be caught and prosecuted. Sadly, but obviously it is unlikely that
most of those responsible for directing the current corrupt practices will ever be identified, let alone prosecuted, and some of those who will be prosecuted will be excused of their crimes by a significant portion of Americans(Ollie North ring any bells?). This does not mean we stop trying, however, and it is vitally important to remember that we only need to uncover the corruption in order to stop its current incarnation. We don't need 100% of those conspiring against America to be prosecuted if the first goal is to maintain the American ideal and preserve our representative Democracy.
Our Democracy is under attack. It has been since the day it was born and it will be in perpetuity. As such the founders built a framework for protecting our system of governance to ensure, to the best of their ability and ours, that we could preserve that Democracy. We protect that system of representative Democracy by employing it.
QUOTE
I pledged I would mute my criticism of the Democrats here, and so I will. But you know from my previous posts how I feel about the majority of them, and so you know how strongly I disagree with your statements and implications that they are doing everything they can do about BushCo.
I disagree with your assertions, but I understand your position.
QUOTE
You say that I do not believe that Democracy is going to work, and there you are correct. I do not believe Democracy in this country is working Now. It may correct itself in the future, it may stay the same, or it may get worse. But I certainly do not share your opinion that we have nothing to worry about, and to just have “Faith” in the system and everything will work out fine. I don’t share that view at all and never will.
If you do not believe that Democracy will work then I submit that it is you against whom we need to be on guard as much as against the Neo-Cons. I am not ready to throw in the towel on this grand American project, and you will find few Americans who are.
As you well know, nowhere have I implied that we have nothing to worry about and that we need to "just have faith in the system". Believing in Representative Democracy is an active process that means more than bitching about what I find wrong while offering no constructive ideas on how those wrongs might be corrected. It means being active in the process, being at least somewhat knowledgeable about the issues, voting, communicating with my elected officials, and holding them accountable. Having faith in the system means using and participating in the system. Our system of governance is not for those waiting for someone else to come along and right what they see as wrong. Representative Democracy is a
we thing, AFW, not for the faint of heart, the weak of spirit, and the lazy of mind.
Perhaps this is why you just don't get it.