The last poll was "NOT" locked "HERE". I forgot to edit that from the other sites SORRY!! These guys here are great, and wouldn't do that. They had locked it here!! http://www.politicalcrossfire.com/forum/vi...pic.php?t=34038[/url]
and a bunch of other places. Please make posts like these with polls and "SPREAD" them!!! I will vote on whatever site you put it on.

This poll should say who hates the "PEOPLES" freedom, as our imperial rulers/Gov don't apply.

Our "collective Gov the entire body says the terroris'ts hate our freedom. Whose the one taking them? Ron Paul seems to be the only man telling the truth, and he is Republican, what does that tell you "people"?

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."
~George W Bush

Take a "CHANCE" people, stop being affraid. If this Gov was so great, and people were so happy losing their collective freedoms, it would be overwhelming that the terrorist's would be winning in this poll.

People know, and are affraid of what it may say. They know! Totalitarianism has been our Military industrial complex for years, they now "see" it's spilling into our civilian lives, and they are unsure of the future. The draft is comming back did you know that? Woman can now be drafted, and the age has been raised to 34, not many people know this.

First our Gov will try and "ENTICE" people with "prospects" of "PEACECORP" fantasies, when that doesn't work the draft will begin, and kids will die for lies, and territory.
This poll will separate us further or bring us closer together the choice is yours America. Who are the ones who really hate our "freedoms"?

Goebel was a master propagandist, and was able to use partisan division to snow the masses. Fascist's use any party who suits their needs, at the particular time? Hitler used the "rightwing" Nationalist DNVP allies to gain POWER. The Reichstag Fire Decree was passed after an act of "terrorism on German soil, blamed on the communist's. The Nazis used the public fear of the Communist's/terrorist's to establish their POWER!

They then shredded their constituiton with something called the Enabling Act, does that sound familiar people? This next Act passed by the third reich limited civil liberties with the expressed purpose of protecting the people of Germany. That says it all.

I have heard talk here of socialism being fascism, and vice versa, it's nonsense, and only serves to muddy the already muddy waters. As for socialism being fascism, that was Goebels "lie" to the labour party in Germany, the "people" of Germany, as is ours to Americans.

Hitler adopted fascism from Mussolini who said fascism was the merger of "Gov", and "Corporate" power, otherwise known as "corporatism". Lincoln said this before they blew his brains out, long before Hitler ever came to town, and fascism was a threat. Licoln said that it would destroy America's Republic, those were his words, and he was 100% right. Are there"patriots" here who want to challenge Lincoln?

Ignorant people, and blind "patriots" can stop trying to revise history, it's all there for "EVERYONE" to see for themselves. Only thing here in America we are told we live in a "Republic Democracy" instead of a socialist society to keep the peace, and snow the masses. Both parties are complicit in these Acts except for one man in Congress named Ron Paul.

Consider the following two statements, and see if you can identify the authors everyone.

Statement Number One: "The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

...Statement Number Two: "To those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve."...

Hermann Goering made the first statement, and Ashcroft made the second. Both telling people dissenting views will no longer be tolerated by Gov. In the U.S. They tolerate "talk", because they are keeping up the "appearance" of a democratic republic. If you step out of line, they "can" take your citizenship away, and charge you for treason, as a foreign entity, or a "terrorist. This is in the Patriot Act 2. Anything our collective Gov deems to be "civil disobedience" falls under this category. Still think we are free America? Now who knows "if" they will use this power, but they "can" if they so choose.

Call me crazy people, but I thought we were "fighting", and dieing to keep ourselves "free", what ever that means? Were we not supposed to be fighting "terrorist's to "KEEP" our freedoms? Our Gov keeps telling us that, but their words don't match their sinister actions. Our Gov tells us the terrorist's hate our freedoms, "WHO" is the one who really hates our freedoms? Whose the one taking them, it's not the terrorist's, it's our collective dictatorial despotic Gov.

So now we are "fighting" terrorism, but we are told we have to give up our constitution, liberties, and freedoms to do it. That German Enabling Act sounds an awful lot like the Patriot Act. Are you a blind "patriot" who can't see the writing on the wall? So what if they called their party socialist, when their actions didn't match their "words". Actions speak louder than words, they always have, and they always will. United we stand divided we fall. Who are the people dividing us today, who are the people that have been teaching partisan hate breeding since we were born? Who are the ones who "try" and control our lives with fear? I'll give you a hint, it's not the "terrorist's.
[right][snapback]25262[/snapback][/right]

I picked 3 because 1 and 2 were not concise enough
Clearly NOT the terrorists.  They're not the issue
And not all of those in government want to destroy our collective freedoms.
Many people in government actually have honor and fight for our American rights!
The use of a blanket statement means it will by it's nature be wrong!

So, my answer was the sort of specific I needed, OK?
[right][snapback]25296[/snapback][/right]

Ok

Ron Paul has spoken out about fascism, I haven't heard anyone else do that in Gov.
[right][snapback]25300[/snapback][/right]

Do you think we can just vote our way out of this cancer? Voting isn't even in our hands anymore, and private banks including the Fedral Reserve have made slaves of the collective "people" with debt, and the National Debt. I don't know the answer, but I do know a couple fighters will probably get slandered in some way, and eventually get replaced with a "patriotic" puppet. I think Hacket is getting smeared as we speak.
[right][snapback]25315[/snapback][/right]

With the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the US attitude toward the rest of the world changed. It now no longer needs to compete for the hearts and minds of the masses of the Third and Fourth Worlds. So trade has replaced aid. The US has embarked on a strategy to use cheap Third/Fourth World labor and non-existent environmental regulation to compete with its former Cold War allies, now industrialized rivals in trade, taking advantage of traditional US anti-labor ideology to outsource low-paying jobs, playing against the strong pro-labor tradition of social welfare in Europe and Japan. In the meantime, the US pushed for global financial deregulation based on dollar hegemony and emerged as a 500-pound gorilla in the globalized financial market that left the Japanese and Europeans in the dust, playing catch-up in an unwinnable game. In the game of finance capitalism, those with capital in the form of fiat money they can print freely will win hands down.

The tool of this US strategy is the privileged role of the dollar as the key reserve currency for world trade, otherwise known as dollar hegemony. Out of this emerges an international financial architecture that does real damage to the actual producer economies for the benefit of the financier economies. The dollar, instead of being a neutral agent of exchange, has become a weapon of massive economic destruction (WMED) more lethal than nuclear bombs and with more blackmail power, which is exercised ruthlessly by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on behalf of the Washington Consensus. Trade wars are fought through volatile currency valuations. Dollar hegemony enables the United States to use its trade deficits as the bait for its capital account surplus.

I picked 3 because 1 and 2 were not concise enough
Clearly NOT the terrorists.  They're not the issue
And not all of those in government want to destroy our collective freedoms.
Many people in government actually have honor and fight for our American rights!
The use of a blanket statement means it will by it's nature be wrong!

So, my answer was the sort of specific I needed, OK?
[right][snapback]25296[/snapback][/right]

I thought this poll would really take off here, as the "people" had asked me to post this poll here. What are you all affraid of just VOTE with your hearts!!
[right][snapback]25329[/snapback][/right]

First of all, we don't have a "collective" government. We have a corporatocracy. The word "collective" implies sharing. A union of business and government, which is what we have, takes, but does not share. They may bribe, but they don't share. And politicians who refuse bribes often meet with unfortunate accidents. That's not how collectives operate, it is how criminal cartels operate.

Secondly, the corporatocracy labels anyone who might possibly impede their desire to own everyone and everything a "terrorist." People who don't want the corporatocracy to steal their oil are called terrorists. People who don't want corporations to poison their air and water and sicken whole communities with their toxic wastes as they extract resources, are called terrorists. The two groups on the FBI's domestic terrorist list are environmentalists and animal rights activists. If you don't think people should be able to kill kittens for fun or profit, you're a terrorist.

I don't think any "people" asked you to post your poll here. I think you've latched onto the words "people" and "collective" and think you can use them in a manipulative way. Many people post polls here that sink like a stone without a single vote, but they don't beg and plead. They just accept that nobody's particularly interested and join or start a topic about something else, or a poll that's better thought out.

You don't need my vote, you don't deserve my vote, and you're not going to get my vote. You have now joined the ranks of some of the greatest politicians in the country, so take a bow! 
[right][snapback]25349[/snapback][/right]

thought this poll would really take off here, as the "people" had asked me to post this poll here. What are you all affraid of just VOTE with your hearts!!

"paper dollars we can print at almost no cost"

How can you say "NO"cost when the Federal Reserve has the American "people" in debt up to their eyeballs making us all slaves to debt. Kennedy tried to destroy the fed he knew what it was going to do, and what did they do to him when he tried it? We have no republic that was destroyed when they killed lincoln, and infant fascism was born.

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order
11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve
Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at
interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the
privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business

PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY 10 days before "OUR" own Gov
assassinated him. This was a coup make no mistake.

  "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to
destroy the Americans freedom and before I leave office I must inform the
Citizen of his plight." 
~John f kennedy

Our Gov couldn't have little Jonny Destroying their cash cow, now could they? So they blew his brains out, they had to make sure he wouldn't live you know
What Lincoln Foresaw:
Corporations Being "Enthroned" After the Civil War
and Re-Writing the Laws Defining Their Existence

"We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing its end.
It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood.
It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.
I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety
of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.
God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless."
~Abraham Lincoln

Those words show Lincoln's letter of 1864 for the unbridled truth written in that letter.

"America will never be destroyed from the OUTSIDE. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because WE destroyed ourselves. "
~Abraham Lincoln
[right][snapback]25326[/snapback][/right]

Do you think we can just vote our way out of this cancer? Voting isn't even in our hands anymore, and private banks including the Fedral Reserve have made slaves of the collective "people" with debt, and the National Debt. I don't know the answer, but I do know a couple fighters will probably get slandered in some way, and eventually get replaced with a "patriotic" puppet. I think Hacket is getting smeared as we speak.
[right][snapback]25315[/snapback][/right]

What can they do if the collective masses of America say No to the IRS?

They'd label tax resisters terrorists, get the FBI and Homeland Security to make mass arrests, and the U.S. prison industry, currently the largest in the world, would declare a larger dividend. But you already know that. Everyone knows that. The question is why you are pretending not to know what everyone else knows.

And what kind of provocateur would mention tax revolt and violent revolution as if they were equivalents to election reform? Election reform is legal, non-violent, and the only thing that has any hope of bringing about real change. Any mention of election reform by someone pretending to your ignorance can only have the intention of attempting to discredit it. Instead, you are continuing to discredit yourself.
[right][snapback]25731[/snapback][/right]