http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/04/11/con04507.html
Full Version: I Have Seen The Future Constitution...
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Politics In General
| QUOTE |
| The Revised Constitution of God's United States A Patriotic Citizens Bill of Rights and Responsibilities (Passed by Congress and Ratified in 2009) Preamble: We the people of God's United States, in order to provide for the common defense, in balance with the blessings of liberty and our position as the Freest Country on Earth ?, do ordain the replacement of the Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with law, and ratified as per the original, outdated Constitution of the United States, by two thirds of both Houses of Congress, as well as the Legislatures of three fourths of the fifty states, in the year of our Lord 2009, to hereafter be known as The Patriotic Citizen's Bill of Rights. The full force of the provisions of these Amendments are effective immediately, and the Judicial Branch of the Government of God's United States is hereby instructed to interpret any disparity between the original Articles of the Constitution and its original Amendments, and this revised and updated Patriotic Citizen?s Constitution, in favor of the latter. Amendment I: With the exception of the state-sanctioned religion of Christianity, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of any other religion or prohibit the private, non-subversive exercise of any religion. Nor shall Congress abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances; although the President and his appointed agents may do so, in Time of War, or serious threat of war or terrorism, to protect the Country and its people, as he, in his sole discretion, deems fit in the exercise of his duty as Commander in Chief. Amendment II: A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state of Patriotic Citizens, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, unless such people are suspected or actual abortionists, illicit drug users, subversives, terrorists, enemy sympathizers or propagandists, as determined by the Department of Homeland Security. Amendment III: No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law, as determined by the President and Commander in Chief, and administered by the Department of Homeland Security. Amendment IV: Except during Time of War, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. During Time of War, as defined by the President and Commander in Chief, representatives of the Department of Homeland Security may take any and all measures necessary to search the homes, effects, electronic communications or records of suspected or actual abortionists, illicit drug users, subversives, terrorists, enemy sympathizers or propagandists, and it shall be a federal crime, as prescribed in federal criminal statute 841 (d) 1, as described in Patriot Act V, to inquire about such searches, or to inform the subjects of such searches, or the public, of any actions taken under this statute by representatives of the Department of Homeland Security. Amendment V: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in Time of War or public danger. With the exception of suspected or actual abortionists, illicit drug users, subversives, terrorists, enemy sympathizers or propagandists; no Patriotic Citizen shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation, unless deemed necessary by the President and Commander in Chief or the Department of Homeland Security. Amendment VI: In all criminal prosecutions except those involving suspected or actual abortionists, illicit drug users, subversives, terrorists, enemy sympathizers or propagandists, Patriotic Citizens accused of crimes shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Amendment VII: In suits at common law which do not involve the Government of God's United States, Government officials, Party Members or Party Institutions, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII: Excessive bail shall not be required of any Patriotic Citizen, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted, with the exception of suspected or actual abortionists, illicit drug users, subversives, terrorists, enemy sympathizers or propagandists. Should abortionists, illicit drug users, subversives, terrorists, enemy sympathizers or propagandists be found guilty, by any state or federal court, of any criminal offense, then their voting privileges for any public election shall be permanently revoked. Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage such rights to unborn children, from the very moment God Almighty breathes life into their eternal souls. In any and all cases, including rape, incest, and health emergencies, any persons infringing upon the life of the unborn, whether mothers, relatives, health care providers, or their co-conspirators, shall be subject to the full force of state statutes concerning homicide or attempted homicide. Amendment X: During Time of War the President, Vice President, and all other elected officials who are members of the Nationalist Party, the only Party found by the American people to be a Patriotic Citizens Party, are exempted by federal, state and local term limit legislation, including Amendment XXII of the outdated Constitution of the United States, prescribing a two term limit to the Office of President. In Time of War, as determined by the President and Commander in Chief, all political parties, with the exception of the Nationalist Party ("The Party"), are suspect and illegal until such Time of War has passed, and it shall be a criminal federal offense to lobby, propagandize, assemble, or vote for any political person or action that is not part of the official Party. It is henceforth the duty of all Patriotic Citizens to vote for and provide support to the Party, until such time as the President, in his sole discretion, determines that God's United States is no longer at war. This Patriotic Citizens Constitution expands the rights, and responsibilities of Citizens in the following manner: All Patriotic Citizens of the United States shall enjoy the right, and responsibility, of receiving and watching Interactive TV. Such responsibilities include an obligation to watch requisite public service announcements, as determined by the President in Time of War. It shall be a federal offense, in Time of War, to tamper with or disable the security delivery or monitoring functions of any Interactive TV device. Patriotic Citizens are also entitled to an expanded right of Pharmacological Happiness, and all providers of health insurance must fully cover the cost of providing such Pharmacological Happiness. In the event that the Department of Homeland Security establishes, in it sole discretion, that a citizen is psychologically imbalanced, then representatives of the General of Homeland Security shall have the right, in Time of War, to define Pharmacological Happiness within the context of the needs of God's United States, and to medicate and/or genetically reform law-breaking criminals as they deem necessary. A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION Excerpted from America 2014: An Orwellian Tale, available from BuzzFlash.com. |
'Bina.
Or, they might just ignore the whole thing.
Citizens have the right to petition the government for the redress of grievances, if they think it will make them feel better.
Citizens have the right to petition the government for the redress of grievances, if they think it will make them feel better.
Seems appropriate to repost my old "Conservative Constitution" from a year or two ago...
BTW, if anybody wants large images of the Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence, I have good scans right here. Of course they can be found readily elsewhere, but feel free to grab 'em if you like.
BTW, if anybody wants large images of the Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence, I have good scans right here. Of course they can be found readily elsewhere, but feel free to grab 'em if you like.
Great image Bu... great one! And all too true today.
| QUOTE (Ronnie Jakers @ Monday, 22 November 2004, 9:08 am) |
| Great image Bu... great one! And all too true today. |
Yeah.... great job RDB...
'Doc
Posting the original constitution could be a yearly tradition as we forelornly look back at how it used to be.
On another topic I don't feel conservatives really applies to Republicans. True conservatives would protect the constitution and not dismantle it. True conservatives would be very cautious in their foreign affairs. True conservatives would be fiscally prudent. What we have in our country is not a bunch of conservatives but a bunch of fascists and we should get used to describing them properly and instead of dragging the name conservative unfairly through the mud.
On another topic I don't feel conservatives really applies to Republicans. True conservatives would protect the constitution and not dismantle it. True conservatives would be very cautious in their foreign affairs. True conservatives would be fiscally prudent. What we have in our country is not a bunch of conservatives but a bunch of fascists and we should get used to describing them properly and instead of dragging the name conservative unfairly through the mud.
| QUOTE (greyowl @ Monday, 22 November 2004, 10:42 am) |
| Posting the original constitution could be a yearly tradition as we forelornly look back at how it used to be. On another topic I don't feel conservatives really applies to Republicans. True conservatives would protect the constitution and not dismantle it. True conservatives would be very cautious in their foreign affairs. True conservatives would be fiscally prudent. What we have in our country is not a bunch of conservatives but a bunch of fascists and we should get used to describing them properly and instead of dragging the name conservative unfairly through the mud. |
So true Greyowl, they are not conservatives, they are neo-facist, right wing, religious freaks....
'Doc
Far's I'm concerned, the conservatives have dragged their OWN damn name through the mud. Lie down with pigs (and they've been doing it for YEARS, so they can't plead ignorance), get up with shit all over you, is how I see it...
And besides, they voted for it. They can take their lumps right along with everybody else who did. And if they are anything like responsible adults, they WILL.
It wasn't liberal Germans who handed the reins of power to Hitler, after all...
'Bina.
And besides, they voted for it. They can take their lumps right along with everybody else who did. And if they are anything like responsible adults, they WILL.
It wasn't liberal Germans who handed the reins of power to Hitler, after all...
'Bina.
| QUOTE (Rev. Day-Bu @ Sunday, 21 November 2004, 10:51 pm) |
| Seems appropriate to repost my old "Conservative Constitution" from a year or two ago... link BTW, if anybody wants large images of the Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence, I have good scans right here. Of course they can be found readily elsewhere, but feel free to grab 'em if you like. |
I'm probably not the first to point out that "The Constitution as seen by Conservatives" image has the arrows pointing to the wrong lines. The First Ammendment is Article 3, the Second Ammendment is article #4, et cetera.
| QUOTE (BinaBecker @ Monday, 22 November 2004, 11:10 am) |
| Far's I'm concerned, the conservatives have dragged their OWN damn name through the mud. Lie down with pigs (and they've been doing it for YEARS, so they can't plead ignorance), get up with shit all over you, is how I see it... And besides, they voted for it. They can take their lumps right along with everybody else who did. And if they are anything like responsible adults, they WILL. It wasn't liberal Germans who handed the reins of power to Hitler, after all... 'Bina. |
Yup, the conservatives of today are not the conservatives of the 50's and 60's this is a new animal, you now like a snake...
'Doc
Constitution will be null and void once the F.T.A.A. and the Pan American Union evolves into the American Union. Just look at the European Union it started with trade agrements and now their on the verge, if not already, being one giant nation without the aproval of their citizens the same will happen here.
If this happens your rights will be replaced with priviledge and the constitution wont be worth the paper it was printed on.
If this happens your rights will be replaced with priviledge and the constitution wont be worth the paper it was printed on.
| QUOTE (rexateyfor @ Friday, 26 November 2004, 1:42 am) |
| Constitution will be null and void once the F.T.A.A. and the Pan American Union evolves into the American Union. Just look at the European Union it started with trade agrements and now their on the verge, if not already, being one giant nation without the aproval of their citizens the same will happen here. If this happens your rights will be replaced with priviledge and the constitution wont be worth the paper it was printed on. |
Um...not quite. EU member states have to abide by an overarching EU constitution, but it doesn't void their own, provided they're all in line. Their own constitutions must respect human rights and guarantee them, so it's actually a good thing to be in the EU. If you have a crappy human rights record and you want in but don't want to change--fuggeddaboudit.
Plus it makes travel from one relatively small country to another so much easier; open borders and common currency have proved a boon to them, as has their combined economic ability to stand up united against the bogus sole superpower, Bushamerica...
The FTAA, on the other hand, is bad for the economies of all but a few large corporations, and tramples human rights regularly. The media never reports on this, because said large corporations are major stakeholders in it. That's why the only aspects of anti-FTAA protests you'll ever see reported are the "riot and destruction" footage the media so loves to use.
'Bina.
I frankly dont care what Europe does if they want to form a Union, let them but I will say it should be the will of the people to decide if they want to join and not forced upon them by their goverments in multiple referendum votes or with no referendum at all.
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art15469.asp
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/nego...ion_process.htm
Hate to break it to ya, chum, but most did hold a referendum, and the results were overwhelmingly YES.
More facts (not conspiracy theories!) here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3825521.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3954327.stm
Looks to me like the people of Europe were MAJORLY for it.
'Bina.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/nego...ion_process.htm
Hate to break it to ya, chum, but most did hold a referendum, and the results were overwhelmingly YES.
More facts (not conspiracy theories!) here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3825521.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3954327.stm
Looks to me like the people of Europe were MAJORLY for it.
'Bina.
http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Trea...y_Const_Rat.htm
Looks to me many countries are undecided about ratification of the EU constitutions and while many will hold referendum votes quite a few wont like Estonia, Germany, Lituania, Malta, Sweeden.
Looks to me many countries are undecided about ratification of the EU constitutions and while many will hold referendum votes quite a few wont like Estonia, Germany, Lituania, Malta, Sweeden.
1994: EU - Accession (Yes 53 % - No 47 % - Turnout 83 %)
2003: Introduction of the Euro (No 56 % - No 42 % - Turnout 83 %)
http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Trea..._Rat_sweden.htm
Sweeden did not vote on the EU constitution they voted on the above and their results proved they were as divided on the issue as the US was and has been since Nov 3rd.
Your link, by the way thanks, showed that Sweeden voted on the single currency but if you scroll down you'll find this
2003: Introduction of the Euro (No 56 % - No 42 % - Turnout 83 %)
http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Trea..._Rat_sweden.htm
Sweeden did not vote on the EU constitution they voted on the above and their results proved they were as divided on the issue as the US was and has been since Nov 3rd.
Your link, by the way thanks, showed that Sweeden voted on the single currency but if you scroll down you'll find this
| QUOTE |
| Constitution threat It is recognised, in other words, that EU referendums - on any subject - are used by voters to vent their feelings about Brussels. This augurs badly for the new constitution. Not all states will put it to a referendum, but those that do will know that voters will take the chance not so much to approve the fine print of a complicated legal text, but simply to pass judgment on their membership of the EU. Countries like Sweden and Denmark could easily throw the entire project out, especially as their highly active anti-euro movements will portray the constitution as a major step towards further integration and loss of sovereignty. The defeat of a referendum on the constitution in the UK would not just affect Britain but the entire EU, leaving two years of painstaking work by Valery Giscard d'Estaing and his fellow constitution-drafters in pieces. |
So? They vented their feelings. That doesn't mean they didn't want in; it only means they had concerns, which one may assume were adequately addressed.
Why look for a grand conspiracy where there is none?
'Bina.
Why look for a grand conspiracy where there is none?
'Bina.
| QUOTE |
| Why look for a grand conspiracy where there is none? |
Your initial post about God's Constitution to be passed in 5 years is enough conspiracy for this post.
And about ventign their feelings I suppose we could have said 47% of America vented their feeligns when they didnt vote for King George but that doesnt mean they didnt want him as president, it only means they had concerns, which one may assume were adequately addressed.
| QUOTE (rexateyfor @ Saturday, 27 November 2004, 9:45 pm) |
| Your initial post about God's Constitution to be passed in 5 years is enough conspiracy for this post. And about ventign their feelings I suppose we could have said 47% of America vented their feeligns when they didnt vote for King George but that doesnt mean they didnt want him as president, it only means they had concerns, which one may assume were adequately addressed. |
There were more than 47% of the American people that didn't vote for George, we will never know for sure because the real votes went down the memory hole...
'Doc
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.