Before the battle began, her victory was a foregone conclusion.

She SHOULD have all the resources in the world behind her helping her secure victory.

She should have been greeted with a swift victory and parade in her honor.

Despite that, she keeps getting her nose bloodied over and over by the scrappy outsider.

She has long since lost the battle, yet she is too proud to take the loss on the chin and regroup and prepare for the future.

She has used the tactics of her worst historical enemy to defeat a lesser foe that she shouldn't have been fighting in the first place.

She uses horrible tactics and then proclaims that she is the victim of the same tactics by her foe.

In order to save face in a battle against the lesser foe she has accepted alliances with the real enemy.

She will divide the country and do real long term damage to the country in the name of spinning a defeat into a victory.

Every time it becomes clear she has lost by existing metrics, she changes the metrics of what real victory would be.

Her campaign is not really about doing the altruistic things that she claims it is, it's about securing power for herself and her friends.

She will accept no authority over her own to say when it is over and it's time for her to get out.

Whoever wins eventually is irrelevant, the people she claims to be fighting for have already lost.

------

If she handles her campaign that much like George Bush has handled the Iraq War, does she really have any credibility when it comes to ending the Iraq war gracefully and in a timely manner?