Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Have you heard? Islamofascism is so passé!
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Politics In General
anniefey
Do not call them 'jihadists': US clamps down on words of the anti-terror campaign

By MATTHEW LEE

WASHINGTON - Do not call them jihadists any more.

Also, do not call al-Qaida a movement.

The Bush administration has launched a new front in the campaign against terrorism, this time targeting language.

Federal agencies, including the State Department, the Homeland Security Department and the National Counterterrorism Center, are telling their people not to describe Islamic extremists as "jihadists" or "mujahedeen," according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. Such verbiage as "Islamo-fascism" is out, too.

The reason: Such words may actually boost support for radicals among Arab and Muslim audiences by giving them a veneer of religious credibility or by causing offense to moderates.

For example, while Americans may understand "jihad" to mean "holy war," it is in fact a broader Islamic concept of the struggle to do good, says the guidance prepared for diplomats and other officials tasked with explaining the anti-terror campaign to the public. Similarly, "mujahedeen," which means those engaged in jihad, must be seen in its broader context.

U.S. officials may be "unintentionally portraying terrorists, who lack moral and religious legitimacy, as brave fighters, legitimate soldiers or spokesmen for ordinary Muslims," says a Homeland Security report. It is titled "Terminology to Define the Terrorists: Recommendations from American Muslims."

"Regarding `jihad,' even if it is accurate to reference the term, it may not be strategic because it glamorizes terrorism, imbues terrorists with religious authority they do not have and damages relations with Muslims around the world," the report says.

Language is critical in fighting terror, says another document, an internal "official use only" memorandum circulating through Washington titled "Words that Work and Words that Don't: A Guide for Counterterrorism Communication."

The memo, originally prepared in March by the Extremist Messaging Branch at the National Counterterrorism Center, was approved for diplomatic use this week by the State Department, which plans to distribute a version to all U.S. embassies, officials said.

"It's not what you say,but what they hear," the memo says in bold italic lettering, listing 14 points about how better to present the anti-terror campaign.

"Don't take the bait," it says, urging officials not to react when Osama bin Laden or al-Qaida affiliates speak. "We should offer only minimal, if any, response to their messages. When we respond loudly, we raise their prestige in the Muslim world."

"Don't compromise our credibility" by using words and phrases that may ascribe benign motives to terrorists.

Some other specifics:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24302289/


It took so many of us seven years to learn the neo-con language and now we have to start all over. Can't President Bush issue a signing statement to nullify this new edict?

sad.gif
anniefey
In response, the administration has gone on a desperate PR blitz to label renewed violence in Iraq as “byproduct of the success of the surge.” “It’s “what critics have wanted to see,” said White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, calling it a struggle led by Iraqi security forces.

Today — as rockets rain down on the Green Zone and two American soldiers died — Bush cast the activity as a “very positive moment” in an interview with the Times of U.K.

Bush’s comments are reminiscent of former White House Press Secretary Tony Snow’s remarks last June, casting skyrocketing violence across Iraq as “things moving towards success…signs of success.”

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/27/bush-iraq-positive/


The way the Bushies use (abuse) language!

War is peace. Up is down.

20,000 jobs lost in April is a "good sign."

mad.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.