Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bad time for a NAFTA summit?
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Economy
sky of mind
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080420/bs_af...it_080420172730


North American leaders for summit of under-fire NAFTA
by Antonio Rodriguez
38 minutes ago - 4.20.8



NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (AFP) - The leaders of Canada, Mexico and the United States meet here Monday for the annual summit of the North American Free Trade Agreement, amid sharp criticism of the pact in the US presidential race.

As US President George W. Bush meets with his Mexican counterpart, Felipe Calderon, and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper in New Orleans, US workers' unions and the Democratic White House hopefuls have lambasted NAFTA.

Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who are battling for the Democratic nomination, have warned that they are willing to re-negotiate parts of the agreement if elected president in November.

NAFTA, which aims to eliminate tariffs on products traded between the three countries, came into effect on January 1, 1994 under Clinton's husband, then-president Bill Clinton.

The trade pact has been a frequent target of labor union charges that it has helped bleed the United States of manufacturing jobs.

"The leaders will probably use the event to underscore the importance of NAFTA at a time when the agreement is coming under fire from the Democratic candidates in the primary race," said Peter DeShazo at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Dan Fisk, the US National Security Council's senior director for the Western Hemisphere, defended NAFTA.

US officials "are aware that some of the statements that have been made (by Clinton and Obama) have made actually bigger headlines in Canada and Mexico than they have here," Fisk said.

"We think NAFTA works," Fisk added. "We think the record of its past 14 years shows that it works. There's nothing broken. Why fix a success?"

Canada is the main US trade partner, and Mexico is its third, Fisk said.

"In terms of three-way trade, as of last year, it was 930 billion dollars," he said.

"That comes to about 2.5 billion dollars in trade in goods and services on a daily basis. We expect that number to reach the one-trillion-dollar mark by the end of this year."

Trade with Canada and Mexico "is 30 percent of the total global trade of the United States," said Fisk.

DeShazo said the leaders will probably "also use the occasion to express support for regional free trade, including the US-Colombia trade agreement pending ratification," he said.

Colombia signed the trade pact with the United States, but it is stuck in the US Congress, whose Democratic majority has demanded that President Alvaro Uribe improve union protection and investigate links between government officials and far-right paramilitaries.

Bush on Saturday urged US congressional leaders to reconsider their opposition to the Colombia trade deal, arguing that there is "a strategic imperative" to approving the measure.

"By obstructing this agreement, Congress is signaling to a watching hemisphere that America cannot be trusted to support its friends," Bush said in his weekly radio address.

On the margins of the main event the three leaders will also likely discuss issues including intellectual property and the safety of trans-border commerce. Immigration may also be on the table, Fisk said.

Bush and Calderon are scheduled Monday to inaugurate a new Mexican consulate in New Orleans, a city still recovering from the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

The population of Mexicans in the state of Louisiana, where New Orleans is located, is currently around 83,000 -- a 55 percent increase in the last two years, largely due to the flow of Mexican laborers helping rebuild the city.

Bush and Calderon may also discuss details of 1.4 billion dollars in US aid for the Merida Initiative, a plan to battle drug trafficking in Mexico and Central America.


grampy9134
I don't know how you feel about nafta, but i feel it is one of the bigest mistakes clinton did to the workers of the U.S.A...And was one huge gift to corporations
sky of mind
QUOTE (grampy9134 @ Monday, 2 June 2008, 6:58 am) *
I don't know how you feel about nafta, but i feel it is one of the bigest mistakes clinton did to the workers of the U.S.A...And was one huge gift to corporations




If I might think I liked Clinton, I consider nafta and what it represents, and all respect I may have had for the man flies right out the window with all the lost American jobs.
grampy9134
Maybe it's time to raise tariffs so as to level the playing field for American workers to get back to building the jobs that were lost
sky of mind
QUOTE (grampy9134 @ Monday, 2 June 2008, 3:50 pm) *
Maybe it's time to raise tariffs so as to level the playing field for American workers to get back to building the jobs that were lost



Forget tariffs. No need to punish other countries for our greedy Corporate profits.
Instead, simply require all US companies operating over seas to implement the same rules there as they are required to adhere to here in the US. Simply remove the biggest loop hole they ever had! Make them operate as clean in Thailand as they do here. Make them pay the same wages and benefits in Malaysia as they do here. Make them pay the same taxes on goods and services in The Philippines as they do here. Etc etc.

Wanna but off shore factories would start to shut down?
karen
QUOTE (sky of mind @ Monday, 2 June 2008, 9:57 pm) *
Forget tariffs. No need to punish other countries for our greedy Corporate profits.
Instead, simply require all US companies operating over seas to implement the same rules there as they are required to adhere to here in the US. Simply remove the biggest loop hole they ever had! Make them operate as clean in Thailand as they do here. Make them pay the same wages and benefits in Malaysia as they do here. Make them pay the same taxes on goods and services in The Philippines as they do here. Etc etc.

Wanna but off shore factories would start to shut down?


Trouble is the people of those countries have become dependent on the crappy pay they get from the globalisation of labour. Where they used to live on subsistence now they rely on what ever wages they can get.
National economies have changed the world over and the multi-nationals (with the aid of the IMF and the World Bank) have it all sewn up.
sky of mind
QUOTE (karen @ Tuesday, 3 June 2008, 4:11 am) *
Trouble is the people of those countries have become dependent on the crappy pay they get from the globalisation of labour. Where they used to live on subsistence now they rely on what ever wages they can get.
National economies have changed the world over and the multi-nationals (with the aid of the IMF and the World Bank) have it all sewn up.



The global economy will regulate it's self, heh heh
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.