seuss
Thursday, 3 April 2008, 5:40 pm
QUOTE (sky of mind @ Thursday, 3 April 2008, 8:36 am)

Being a hippie doesn't mean giving up personal principals, and it doesn't mean giving up the ability to fight for what's right. Being a hippie means you'de rather not, and would make every reasonable effort to avoid a fight. Hippies LOVE diplomacy, and have much greater respect for those that can think out a problem rather than use brute force. Hippies do recognize that sometimes brute force is a viable option, but it's almost always way down on the list.
Being a liberal doesn't equate to being soft, pansy arse weenies.
Being a liberal, we're just as strong and capable, but were also into using our noodle more than our fists.
Most liberals realize that in a fight, nobody wins. We call the one that loses least, the winner.
are you equatining hippiness with liberalism?
I know plenty of hippies that aren't liberals. just 'cause they don't want to fight doesn't make them liberals. I've got plenty of conservative leanings, yet I'll catch a moth and release it outdoors, rather than kill it. I don't like the expenses the neocons have spewed out their various orifices, yet that's actually conservative. I don't like the concept of taking over another country and imposing our will on them, but that's actually a conservative idea.
But I am deffinately a hippie.
Why do we have to fall back on "us and them" polarization and labeling?
The majority of americans, and in fact people in general, when the are removed from the fray, and think about things in a hypothetical framework, will choose the kind, rightous, and peaceful path.
They're all hippies, wether they label themselves that way or not.