Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Nazi Paramiliary Groups and Arizona Minutemen--Now Blackwater
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > General > History
Pages: 1, 2
Antifascist
The purpose of this thread is to document how private soldiers and private organizations are used in right-wing political activities as para-military organizations. Eventually, these para-military expect reward for their thuggery and seek acceptance into the government formally. We can see this process with the evolution of the SS and SA in Nazi Germany. We can see the same dynamics in American society today with paramilitary groups, many former US soldiers, volunteering to assist the government with national security issues in an environment where everything is viewed as a national security issue. This examination is necessary because the United States government and the main stream media protects the identities of these groups and conceals the historical backgrounds of these individuals when their activities become unavoidably known.

History seems to be repeating itself. The first use of the para-military German Freikorps was to patrol the eastern border of Germany in 1919.
"Armed free-corps [Freikorps] bans sprang up all over Germany and were secretly equipped by the Reishswehr [Regular Army]. At first they mainly used to fight the Poles and the Balts on the disputed eastern frontiers, but soon they were backing plots for the overthrow of the republican regime. (Rise and Fall of The Third Reich, Simon and Schuster 1960, William L. Shirer, pp. 33)"

Nazi Paramilitary Groups:SA and SS
Paramilitary History
The most important Nazi Paramilitary organizations where the SA (Sturm Abteilung, literally Storm Troops) and the SS (Schutzstaffel, literally Elite Echelon). The HJ or Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth) was not really a paramilitary organizaiton in the beginning, since it was designed to organize and recruit young people for the Nazi movement.

The antecedent of Himmler's "Black Corps," or SS, is to be found in Hitler's private bodyguard, formed before the 1923 Putsch from a small clique of desperados known as the Assault Squad. The Assault Squad's few men, demobilized NCOs, freebooters, laborers, and adventurers, shared utter loyalty to the person of Hitler, whom they had sworn to protect at all costs.

The Assault Squad was led by an SA man, Julius Schreck, and a stationer who worked in the party treasury, Joseph Berchtold. It was prepared to perform whatever task their Führer gave them, usually requiring muscle or a show of force. Thus 50 of Berchtold's men, already wearing black-bordered swastika armbands and black ski-caps with a silver death's head button, accompanied Hitler when he made his melodramatic entry into the Bürgerbräukeller on November 8, 1923, to announce the misadventure known as the Beer Hall Putsch. Five of them were killed during the melee with the police in front of the Odeonplatz. At the time the SA probably had about 2,000 men and the Assault Squad no more than 100, reflecting their respective importance then and later.

The strong-arm wing of the party had a rather innocuous beginning as the "gymnastics and sport section," founded by Emil Maurice, a 23 year old watchmaker, in November 1920. After Hitler seized control of the party in the following year, and changed the name to Sturmabteilung, expansion in size and role helped to solidify his own control and create an activist core for the movement. A notorious Free Corps leader, Captain Hermann Ehrhardt, provided recruits and money. The nascent SA was different from the numerous Free Corps, composed largely of veterans who had served the new government as a kind of counter-revolutionary force. They later created a militaristic subculture, violently opposed to the Weimar Republic. The SA, however, appealed to youth and restricted membership to those between the ages of 17 and 23. It was much younger, included fewer veterans, and gave the party much of its bravado. Battling the communist and socialist "enemy," was the main task of the SA, and helped to turn it into "the most active and radical paramilitary organization in Bavaria" already before 1923.

During the Putsch the SA was hardly distinguishable from the other völkisch groups in the coalition Hitler put together for the coup. After its failure, Hermann Göring, the actual commander of the SA in 1923, went into exile, Hitler and other leaders were in jail, and all party organizations were outlawed. Captain Ernst Röhm, most active liaison officer of the Bavarian Reichswehr to the paramilitary organizations, had been the main organizer of the early SA. When he was released from prison in April 1924, Röhm proceeded to reactivate SA units throughout the country and organize them, along with other völkisch paramilitary groups, into the Frontbann.

This organization, which acquired some 40,000 members, was a military association in the old style, whereas Hitler wanted a political combat league more appropriate to the legal course he adopted after the Putsch. When Hitler began to rebuild the party in 1925, he refused to accept the Frontbann, while Röhm declined Hitler's offer to command a new SA. Röhm could not agree - and never really did - that this paramilitary tool should be at the discretionary disposal of the political leadership and shed its purely military characteristics. Röhm then went off to Bolivia in a sulking mood, the Frontbann disintegrated, and the SA submitted to direction from local party leaders. Significant growth began with the appointment of Captain Franz Pfeffer von Salomon as Supreme SA Leader (OSAF) in the fall of 1926. He built the SA into a disciplined and reliable party army, which fought the "internal enemy" by violent means.

Uncertainty over the basic character of the SA, alerted Hitler to the need for a totally reliable force, a kind of praetorian guard, which would put a check on the rowdy streetfighters. In February 1925, before the SA was officially reborn, Hitler created small elite echelons (Schutzstaffeln) in various cities where SA units already existed. Two months later the miniscule SS, patterned to some degree on the extinct Assault Squad, revealed its essential future character by serving as funeral torchbearers for the former police president of Munich. But in the shadow of an expanding SA, the SS barely maintained its existence under several ineffective leaders. In July 1926, during the same party rally which recognized Kurt Gruber's HJ at Weimar, the SS was declared to be the elite organization of the party.

In an arcane ceremony, typical of many mysterious practices with which the SS was to be associated, the "blood banner" which had been stained during the conflict with the police on the Odeonplatz in 1923, was transferred to the SS for safekeeping. The SS was not to exceed ten percent of SA strength in any one locality. Such deliberate restriction enforced its elitist feeling, while stern discipline turned the SS man into "the most exemplary party member conceivable." Neither hard-bitten party bosses, nor swaggering and uncouth SA commanders took kindly to the elitist pretensions of the SS and used them mainly to run errands, recruit party members, and sell newspapers. In January 1929, when the SS had some 1,200 members, things began to change quickly. Hitler appointed a little known and apparently unassuming 28 year old party bureaucrat Reichsführer of the SS. His name was Heinrich Himmler, surely one of the strangest and most unfathomable men in modern history. During his short sojourn he has left a trail of blood and terror behind him which few can equal.

At the time Himmler was hardly noticed or appreciated, having served as secretary and deputy to party propaganda chief, Gregor Strasser. Coming from a proper Catholic middle-class family, with a father who had been tutor to the Bavarian royal house and had a successful career as professor and director of several prestigious Bavarian Gymnasia, Himmler's upbringing was anything but irregular. Psychohistorians have found reason to believe that his prolonged adolescence consisted of an unsuccessful effort to master libidinal drives, forcing him to resort to obsessive repression, projection, and exaggerated self-discipline. He is supposed to have developed an inordinate identification with his tyrannical father, later replaced by surrogates, like Röhm and Strasser (both of whom he helped to murder subsequently), but the most notable of which was to be Hitler. Weak object relation and the lack of a feeling of self-worth and distinct individuality, theoretically, led him to imbibe the prevailing values of the post-war generation. These values included xenophobic nationalism, fear of conspiratorial secret societies like Freemasons, and Jews, militaristic violence and social probity.

Although the young Himmler's conversion to the völkisch ideology was gradual, almost accidental by virtue of his random but avaricious reading habits, he developed two early obsessions, the satisfactions of a military life and the appeals of character-building agrarian pursuits. These were to find their perverse fulfillment in the Waffen-SS and a population policy based on the blood and soil ideology. While these aspects of his wartime career may have been in part the result of an unsuccessful adolescence, they were imposed on thousands of adolescents whose formative years were probably no more successful than his and whose choices were more restricted. He also develop an early interest in spying, which he practiced on his older brother Gebhard's fiance, alleging that she was promiscuous and hence unfit for inclusion in the Himmler family. Eventually he managed to break up the romance.

In a conventional sense, the young Himmler was certainly more successful than most of his contemporaries. He completed military training as a cadet, a career in uniform being stymied by the end of the war. Completing his studies in agronomy at the Technische Hochschule in Munich, he made a career for himself as a minor bureaucrat in the Nazi Party, in part because he could not find a post as farm manager, although he was willing to go anywhere, even Russia and Turkey. At the same time he pursued his ambitions in the Artamanen, an agrarian youth movement, the paramilitary Reichskriegsflagge, and even tried his hand at scientific poultry-breeding. His marriage to an older woman was not too promising from the start, and may have had something to do with his unrealistic but conventional conception of women as weak and subordinate, fit primarily for domestic chores and childbearing.

The SS provided Himmler with an outlet, particularly his penchant for order, detail, organizational finesse, and misplaced sense of moral and social rectitude. His father's pedantry, which went so far as to correct his son's diary entries, played a role here. The feeling of superiority, which these attitudes generated, compensated for inner emptiness, the absence of self-assurance and a satisfying sense of moral values. He naturally adopted Hitler as his superego, replacing an earlier fascination with Ernst Röhm. Himmler built up the SS, as a consequence, by assiduously appealing to old-line aristocrats and wealthy members of the middle class, making them patrons and honorary members in exchange for financial support and transferred social prestige. This set Himmler's SS off from the SA and the rest of the party, whose misbehavior and ideological deviation the SS was, after all, to watch and report. Being a kind of party police both by precept and function, the raison d'etre of the SS was loyalty to the Führer. The political context of the times and the projected role of the SS, led Himmler to imbue the organization with military titles, ordered hierarchy, and combative spirit.

Both SS and SA soon experienced phenomenal growth, as the depression drove unemployed lower middle-class men and workers into the latter and middle-class intellectuals and professionals into the former. Himmler's Elite numbered 10,000 by 1931 and Pfeffer's organizational skills and training methods turned the SA into a movement in its own right by the fall of 1930, when it claimed 60,000 streetwarriors. The use of the SA as propaganda army, "a sort of permanent election campaign with terroristic methods," had much to do with the election breakthrough of the Nazi Party in the September elections to the Reichstag. But success created its own disparities and frictions which the SA-owned economic enterprises could not mitigate. Resentment of slack and corrupt party politicians, who reaped the benefits while the SA did all the work, added to impatience with Hitler's continued "legal" approach to power. It brought restlessness and buried "socialist" tendencies in the activist SA to a head.

In the summer of 1930 Pfeffer resigned in a fit of anger. Shortly before the September election, the Berlin SA revolted against the temporizing party politicians, namely Gauleiter Josef Goebbels and his SS allies, followed by a more serious SA revolt in April 1931, led by Walther Stennes, Pfeffer's erstwhile deputy. Since the rebellion was not directed at Hitler personally, he was able to quell it by a shrewd combination of concessions and charisma. During the episode the SS came into its own for the first time by protecting the politicians who were physically in danger and by keeping the SA rebels at bay with weapons drawn. Hitler, who had assumed overall command of the SA shortly after Pfeffer's resignation, decided to recall Röhm and make him chief of staff. Röhm was more than eager to resume the leadership over what was clearly an exploding organization with 260,000 members at the end of 1931 and over half a million men in January 1933.

The slower growing SS, for whom Hitler was more of a surrogate father than he was for the SA, reached a milestone with the Stennes affair. After this event Hitler gave his dependable SS the motto which was to become its most characteristic symbol until the final days of the war: "SS man your honor is loyalty!" A nearly mystical idea of loyalty expressed the core of Himmler's personality and now it was to be also the heart of the SS organization.

It was more than fortuitous that 1931 was also the year when two of Himmler's most important associates joined forces with him to create two essential SS organizational segments with their own ideological props and pervasive activities: Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich and Richard Walther Darré.

Heydrich's upbringing was both normal in the conventional sense and more privileged than Himmler's. Certainly the cultural environment was more refined, his father being the founder and director of a musical conservatory and a fairly well-known composer of operas and popular fare. The sensitive and withdrawn boy developed a certain distance from his father, being much closer to his mother, in this sense being not unlike Himmler. Unsure of himself, despite his obvious talent and intellect, he early became arrogant and cynical, jealous of his siblings greater social success. His father's running battle against rumors of his Jewish origins, a legend never successfully quashed during his lifetime, was to have its effect on Reinhard from early youth. Even though he played the violin well and dabbled with the idea of becoming a chemist, Reinhard choose the navy nearly on the spur of the moment.

His promising career in the somewhat politically suspicious service did not get very far. As a 27 year old ex-naval lieutenant, who had left the service under scandalous circumstances, Heydrich presented himself to Himmler in the fall of 1931 with plans for an SS intelligence operation. Perhaps influenced by the fact that the navy had once rejected him on physical grounds and impressed by Heydrich's quick intelligence, maybe even awed by the handsome man's reputation as chronic womanizer, Himmler gave Heydrich a virtual carte blanche. The Security Service (SD) which he created became his and Himmler's vehicle to power by acquiring exclusive intelligence prerogatives first within the SS, then within the party, and finally within the state.

Darré was quite different from Heydrich, the cynical, pragmatic realist and political tactician with few peers in the Nazi melange. Born in Argentina and educated at King's College School, Wimbledon, Darré, the ex-official in the Prussian Ministry of Agriculture, had developed unusual theories about the nature of current agrarian problems. He insisted they were largely a matter "of blood," i.e., a hereditarily healthy peasantry alone could maintain the racial fecundity and cultural superiority of the Aryan stock. Five years Himmler's senior, the blood and soil ideologue took Himmler under his wing as a willing pupil when they met in the Artamanen, in which both were active during the 1920s. Before 1931 Darré had founded the party's Agrarian Political Office, converted himself into the party's agricultural expert, and then joined the SS as chief of the new SS Race Office created in December 1931. Two years later it became the Race and Settlement Office, a more appropriate designation for an agency that purveyed racism, elitism, suburban housing developments and reversion to an agrarian culture all at once.

While Himmler had adopted the prevailing culture's anti-semitism in his youth, it was Darré's agrarian racism more than Hitler's Austrian version, or the 1920 party program's anti-capitalist and anti-semitic "slavery of interest" version, which laid the basis for the racial fixation of the SS. Genetic reconstitution became the propagandistic gospel of the SS, symbolized by Himmler's notorious marriage code, suggested by Darré, a biogenetic engineer before his time, and in the view of one recent biographer the "father" of the environmentalist "Greens" in West Germany today. This code required that SS men and their prospective wives submit certified proof of Aryan ancestry and undergo minute physical examinations. Himmler, whose relationship with girls in adolescence had been stiff and distant, himself pored over photographs of SS brides in scanty apparel to make sure they met his standards of Nordic health and beauty.

Here was the origin of the so-called SS Order, which later was infused with medieval pomp and arcane ceremony, inspired by Himmler's dead heroic model, King Henry the Fowler of Saxony, conqueror of Slavs and initiator of eastward imperial expansion. Himmler was to revive this imperialism with a racist vengeance, based on the "soldier-farmer" settlement notions of Darré, which actually had their antecedents in Roman and Austro-Hungarian frontier defense policies. These anachronistic preoccupations of the SS were to find at least partial implementation in the HJ Land Service and the population policies of the National Youth Directorate.

The security functions and self-conscious elitism had a tendency to set the SS apart from the SA, illustrated by the fact that the SS had 50 percent more casualties than the SA in the street battles of 1930 to 1933. The elitist ideology, aside from its historical and racist underpinnings, its emphasis on height and presumed Aryan physical characteristics, led Himmler to be increasingly more selective in the acceptance of new recruits. His own comparative youth, his association with the Artamanen, and as a way of putting distance between his SS and the SA, Himmler insisted, particularly after January 1933, that new recruits should be under 25 years of age. This was bound to lead him eventually to view the HJ as a most significant ally.

The suppressive role of the SS, the assignment of security duties at the new party headquarters in the Brown House, and the reservation of leadership appointments to Himmler, gave the SS distinction from the party-controlled and party-financed SA. The SS, not regularly financed through the party until 1938, was dependent on its own resources. Himmler's ingenious use of the "Sponsoring Membership" mechanism, vastly extended from Berchtold's original idea, allowed the SS to become financially independent, while at the same time adumbrating its elitist image and attraction. Honorary memberships, titles and medals, were thus bestowed on thousands of "lay brothers" who contributed a fixed number of Marks per month. Wealthier members of society could afford to make such contributions more easily than poorer ones.

The proportionately large percentage of upper middle-class sponsors and the nearly negligible proportion from the working-class, had a tendency to confer old-fashioned respectability of the traditional elites to the newly proclaimed elite of the SS in the popular mind. In 1931, old-line aristocrats, who in the calculations of most sociologists no longer deserved even a separate category for purposes of structural analysis, occupied some 10 percent of the regional administrative posts in the SS. In addition to aristocrats and retired army officers, the SS was especially successful in attracting large numbers of young landowners, industrialists, professors and lawyers, the latter two being particularly prominent in Heydrich's SD.

Using the potent appeals of social and economic elitism, biological racialism, police and espionage functions, Himmler was able to attract a solid phalanx of professionals, technicians, experts, militarists, aggressive ideologists, and rationalistic bureaucrats, to whom organizational success and achievement as such mattered a great deal. Old fashioned morality and ethical standards, for most of them, seemed to be clearly overshadowed by overweening ambition to make careers for themselves and create pockets of personal power within the larger context of the SS and Hitler's approaching regime.

By January 1933 the SS with its 52,000 members was in a position to play a decisive role in the process of seizing power and encompassing a disoriented society. The HJ, with a membership twice that size, played an equally important role in "synchronizing" the youthful masses. In the course of this disruptive and murderous campaign both SS and HJ moved away from the SA, still dominant on the streets.
Antifascist
The Arizona Minutemen are made up of many armed right-wing extremist groups and are organizing again as they did around the time Tim McVeigh bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in April 19, 1995. I remember this hugh build up of right-wing extremist propaganda on radio during this time demanding the overthrow of the U.S. government. The media concealed this connection to right wing extremist groups when covering Tim McVeigh's crimes.
QUOTE
Conservatives have successfully re-airbrushed the Oklahoma City bombing as the act of a single maniac (or two) rather than the piece of right-wing terrorism it was, derived wholly from an ideological stew of venomous hate that has simultaneously been seeping into mainstream conservatism throughout the 1990s and since.

The Patriot movement that inspired Tim McVeigh and his cohorts -- as well as a string of other would-be right-wing terrorists who were involved in some 40-odd other cases in the five years following April 15, 1995 -- indeed is descended almost directly from overtly fascist elements in American politics. Much of its political and "legal" philosophy is derived from the "Posse Comitatus" movement of the 1970s and ‘80s, which itself originated (in the 1960s) from the teachings of renowned anti-Semite William Potter Gale, and further propagated by Mike Beach, a former "Silver Shirt" follower of neo-Nazi ideologue William Dudley Pelley.21
http://www.cursor.org/stories/fascismv.php
During the Reagan Administration these groups were concentrated in the National guard and where being armed with tanks and helicopters until even the the Reagan Administration became alarmed and stopped this mobilization. Ollie North had completed drafting plans for establishing marshal law in the U.S. through FEMA.

Today the mainstream media is handling this border patrol event lightly and is portraying these groups more like a "neighborhood watch" group. This is extremely dangerous for the press to fail in it's responsibility to investigate and inform the American people about the true nature of these groups and activities.

QUOTE
Group Calling Themselves "Minutemen" to Patrol Arizona Border
Volunteer border patrol group wants to fill in where federal agents are failing

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/article/a...359&id=3132

Lara Lakes Jordan
Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - Intent on securing the vulnerable Arizona border from illegal immigrant crossings, U.S. officials are bracing for what they call a potential new threat this spring: the Minutemen.

Nearly 500 volunteers have already joined the Minuteman Project, anointing themselves civilian border patrol agents determined to stop the immigration flow that routinely, and easily, seeps past federal authorities. They plan to patrol a 40-mile stretch of the southeast Arizona border throughout April when the tide of immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border peaks.

"I felt the only way to get something done was to do it yourself," said Jim Gilchrist, a retired accountant and decorated Vietnam War veteran who is helping recruit Minutemen across the country.

"We've been repeatedly accused of being people who are taking the law into our own hands," said Gilchrist, 56, of Aliso Viejo, Calif. "That is an outright bogus statement. We are going down there to assist law enforcement."

Officials concede the 370-mile Arizona border is the most porous stretch on the U.S.-Mexico line. Moreover, recent intelligence show that al-Qaida terrorists are likely to enter the country through the Mexico border, James Loy, the deputy secretary of the Homeland Security Department, said last week.

"Several al-Qaida leaders believe operatives can pay their way into the country through Mexico, and also believe illegal entry is more advantageous than legal entry for operational security reasons," Loy said in written testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Of the 1.1 million illegal immigrants caught by the U.S. Border Patrol last year, 51 percent crossed into the country at the Arizona border. The agency increased the number of agents in the Tucson sector, which has its largest staff, from 1,700 to 2,100 over the last 18 months.

But that number is going to grow to try to plug the remaining holes, said Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert C. Bonner. About 10,000 federal agents now patrol the 2,000-mile southern border, he said.

Officials fear the Minuteman patrols could cause more trouble than they prevent. At least some of the volunteers plan to arm themselves during the 24-hour desert patrols. Many are untrained and have little or no experience in confronting illegal border crossings.

"Any time there are firearms and you're out in the middle of no-man's land in difficult terrain, it's a dangerous setting," said Bonner, whose agency is keeping a close eye on the Minutemen plans.

"The Border Patrol does this every day, and they are qualified and very well-trained to handle the situation," he said. "Ordinary Americans are not. So there's a danger that not just illegal migrants might get hurt, but that American citizens might get hurt in this situation."

Civilian patrols are nothing new along the southern border, where crossing the international line is sometimes as easy as stepping over a few rusty strands of barbed wire. But they usually are limited to small, informal groups, leaving organizers to believe the Minuteman Project is the largest of its kind on the southern border.

It may also prove to be a magnet for what Glenn Spencer, president of the private American Border Patrol, described as camouflage-wearing, weapons-toting hard-liners who might get a little carried away with their assignments.

"How are they going to keep the nutcases out of there? They can't control that," said Spencer, whose 40-volunteer group, based in Hereford, Ariz., has used unmanned aerial vehicles and other high-tech equipment to track and report the number of border crossings for more than two years.

"There's a storm gathering here on the border, and there are conditions ripe for some difficulty," he said.

The border agents agree.

The Minutemen "clearly have every reason to be upset with the federal government for abandoning them," said National Border Patrol Council president T.J. Bonner, no relation to the commissioner.

But "if anything goes wrong, God forbid, someone does injure an agent, this government is going to be turning both barrels on them and come after them with a vengeance," he said.

Gilchrist said the Minutemen are under strict orders to merely identify and follow illegal border crossers and alert federal agents. They should not interact with the immigrants except to offer food, water or medical care. If there's a couple of "bad apples" who turn up in the group, Gilchrist said, they will face prosecution if they step outside the law.

Something dramatic needed to be done to curb the years of crime, property damage and trash dumping caused by the border crossings, Gilchrist said.

"Things are out of control" said Gilchrist. "And they've been out of control for decades."
Who is Gilchrist? You would think the Associated Press, a member of the mainstream press, would make an effort to clarify this point.
QUOTE
NEWS MEDIA AND L.E.O:

To: Members of the Fourth Estate (media) and law enforcement organizations (LEO):

Generally, the Minuteman Project policy relative to the media and law enforcement is:

1. No restrictions.

2. Open season to all media and law enforcement.

3. Information provided "on demand".

4. Occasional "no media / no law enforcement" times are necessary for the MMP organizers to meet privately.

5. Access to the MMP Communications Center will be limited, and only with the permission of the CommMasters responsible for maintaining that center.

During the month of April, the MMProject volunteers, currently over 1,000 in number from 50 states across the nation, will converge on Cochise County, Az. under the colors of their separate state flags for the purpose of bringing national awareness to the illegal alien invasion crisis currently threatening the sovereignty, prosperity, and governance by the rule of law of the United States.

The MMProject opening presentation will be conducted in Tombstone, Az. on the afternoon of Friday, April 1, 2005 at a location to be announced. Thereafter, on dates to be announced, one-day rallies will be held in Tucson and Naco, Az. Also, a surprise rally lasting two consecutive days will be held in Douglas, Az. without notice.

Although we anticipate an attendance of at least 1,000 participants as of March 20, 2005, that number may double or triple by April 1.

Our members are well educated, mature, and seek to assemble under the rights guaranteed to them by the First Amendment of The U. S. Constitution, for the purpose of expressing their sincere disappointment in the lack of U.S. immigration law enforcement by our political leaders and their appointees. The MMProject will assemble for 30 days in peace and observe, film and report to the media, and the USBP, the chaotic conditions at the U.S. - Mexico border in southern Arizona.

The roster of volunteers currently includes 12 PhDs, three professors from state universities, several dozen current and former members of law enforcement, free-lance journalists, teachers, engineers, truck drivers, construction trade personnel, firemen, EMTs, geologists, home-makers ("MinuteMoms"), six physicians, 11 attorneys, two CPAs, janitors, college students, labor-union members, two students of divinity, aircraft pilots, three former state-level politicians, long-range reconnaissance specialists, computer scientists, taxi drivers, retired career military fromenlisted and officer ranks, and others.


The participants are comprised of various religious and ethnic roots, and include four wheel chair bound persons and seven "legal" immigrants from six countries. About one third of the participants are women. Eight per cent are of non-American-European (also referred to as "Whites") ethnicity, specifically: 18 American-Mexicans, four American-Armenians, twenty one Native American Indians (Cherokee, Comanche, Sioux, and other tribes), one American-Lebanese, one Russian, and others.

At least 100 members of the print and broadcast media will be present to witness and report these activities.

The specific intention of the MMProject is to establish passive observation outposts

throughout the San Pedro Valley. MMProject observers will identify and report to the

U.S. Border Patrol persons who have illegally trespassed United States territory.

No deliberate confrontation or detention of the illegal alien intruders is planned, or encouraged, by the MMProject. Its purpose is to be strictly a passive observer/reporter, similar to a neighborhood watch group. Any interception and detention of the illegal aliens is specifically the obligation of the U. S. Border Patrol and/or other law enforcement agencies.

The MMProject will chronicle all events relative to the reporting of illegal alien obervations and the response to calls for assistance to the U.S. Border Patrol.

These reports will be made available to all media on demand.

Respectfully Yours,
Jim Gilchrist - The Minuteman Project
The power of change through the power of peace.
http://www.minutemanproject.com/NewsMedia.html

Antifascist
Also, notice that already some of these Minuteman leaders have had contact, in some cases actual gun battles, with regular U.S. government security forces. Our government worked with the same kind of outlaws known as the Contras so don't think that because some of the extremists are being prosecuted by the U.S. government automatically rules them out as useful allies of the U.S. government. They, in fact, fit the bill perfectly. Our government is very experienced and expert with working in tandem with these kinds of groups.
QUOTE
SANTA FE, N.M.
Former Minutemen Militia member Raymond Kodiak Sandoval was arrested on Feb. 14 in connection with two anti-environmental crimes: putting a pipe bomb in an environmental group's mailbox and setting a forest fire in June 1998 that scorched more than 5,100 acres of the Jemez Mountains and nearby Pueblo land. It took more than 800 firefighters and $3.5 million to contain the blaze. Sandoval, who reportedly started his own militia after leaving the Minutemen, could serve up to 70 years if convicted.
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport...icle.jsp?sid=17

QUOTE
Anti-Immigration
Cops, neighbors fire back at Arizona's border vigilantes
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=513

Things are heating up for anti-immigrant vigilante groups near Arizona's southern border, where key figures found themselves jailed, shot and homeless this fall.
On Sept. 15, Casey Nethercott, 37, and associate Kalen Riddle, 22, were stopped by federal agents in the parking lot of a Safeway store near Douglas, Ariz. Authorities had a warrant for Nethercott's arrest based on a tense stand-off with border patrol agents two weeks prior, but the arrest did not go smoothly. Riddle was shot and critically injured while being detained, while Nethercott ended up charged with assault on a federal officer.

Nethercott, a former associate of the paramilitary anti-immigrant group Ranch Rescue, had been running an armed border militia called Arizona Guard on ranch property he owned near Douglas. He was convicted on a weapons charge in June, and also awaits retrial for allegedly pistol-whipping a Salvadoran couple in Texas in 2003 during a Ranch Rescue operation.

Nethercott had already been ordered to pay $350,000 in damages as a result of a civil suit brought by the Southern Poverty Law Center on behalf of the Salvadoran immigrants.

Several miles west of Douglas, another border vigilante came out on the losing end of a dispute with neighbors. American Border Patrol's Glenn Spencer, a long-time anti-immigration rabble-rouser in California, moved to the border region in August 2002, setting up operations in a columned ranch-style home in the upscale Pueblo del Sol subdivision as he built up his Web site and patrol operations in the area.

Relations with his neighbors were soured by an August 2003 incident in which a jumpy Spencer repeatedly fired a .357 rifle, hitting a neighbor's garage, after hearing what he described as "suspicious" noises in his back yard. In January 2004 Spencer pleaded guilty to a charge of endangerment, and was subsequently fined $2,500 and sentenced to a year's probation.

But it wasn't just Spencer's quick draw that irked neighbors. In Spencer's neighborhood association, the operation of a home business is prohibited. The homeowners filed a complaint, and a preliminary injunction against Spencer was granted in September.

Although Spencer maintained that most of his hate group's business was conducted from rented office space in nearby Sierra Vista, he chose not to fight the injunction and announced through his attorney that he would be leaving the property by the end of October.

Spencer says he'll relocate to 10 acres near the Mexican border, and he's been soliciting funds from supporters to put an airstrip and RV hookups on his new compound.

Yet the government of George W. Bush has left wing groups well in site. No ambiguity here.
QUOTE
Congressional Quarterly HOMELAND SECURITY ' INTELLIGENCE
March 25, 2005 ' 9:43 p.m.
Animal Rights Groups and Ecology Militants Make DHS Terrorist List, Right-Wing Vigilantes Omitted
By Justin Rood, CQ Staff
http://www.cq.com/corp/show.do?page=crawfo...050325_homeland

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not list right-wing domestic terrorists and terrorist groups on a document that appears to be an internal list of threats to the nation's security.

According to the list ' part of a draft planning document obtained by CQ Homeland Security ' between now and 2011 DHS expects to contend primarily with adversaries such as al Qaeda and other foreign entities affiliated with the Islamic Jihad movement, as well as domestic radical Islamist groups.

It also lists left-wing domestic groups, such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), as terrorist threats, but it does not mention anti-government groups, white supremacists and other radical right-wing movements, which have staged numerous terrorist attacks that have killed scores of Americans. Recent attacks on cars, businesses and property in Virginia, Oregon and California have been attributed to ELF.

DHS did not respond to repeated requests for comment or confirmation of the document's authenticity.

The conspirators behind the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people and wounded more than 500, were inspired by radical right-wing movements. Eric Rudolph, the man charged with carrying out the 1996 Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta, which killed one woman and injured more than 100, was a member of the radical anti-abortion group Army of God. Initially, Rudolph was the object of a massive North Carolina manhunt in connection with a Birmingham, Ala., abortion-clinic bombing that killed a police officer and seriously maimed a nurse.

Another Army of God member, James Kopp, was convicted in the 1998 shooting of a doctor who performed abortions.

Individuals affiliated with such groups have also been involved in many smaller terrorist acts, including mailing hundreds of bogus anthrax letters to abortion clinics, and in plots to obtain and use conventional, chemical and nuclear weapons against civilians. In 2003, for instance, a Texas man prosecutors say was a white supremacist and anti-government radical pleaded guilty to charges of possessing a weapon of mass destruction. Authorities had discovered enough sodium cyanide bombs to kill hundreds of people; machine guns and several hundred thousand rounds of ammunition; 60 pipe bombs; and remote-control explosive devices disguised as briefcases in a storage space he rented. The man, William J. Krar, was sentenced to 11 years in federal prison.

'Still a Threat'
Domestic terror experts were surprised the department did not include right-wing groups on their list of adversaries.

'They are still a threat, and they will continue to be a threat,' said Mike German, a 16-year undercover agent for the FBI who spent most of his career infiltrating radical right-wing groups. 'If for some reason the government no longer considers them a threat, I think they will regret that,' said German, who left the FBI last year. 'Hopefully it's an oversight.'

James O. Ellis III, a senior terror researcher for the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT), said in a telephone interview Friday that whereas left-wing groups, which have been more active recently, have focused mainly on the destruction of property, right-wing groups have a much deadlier and more violent record and should be on the list. 'The nature of the history of terrorism is that you will see acts in the name of [right-wing] causes in the future.'

Focusing on Left-Wing Movements
Last year, following arson and vandalism sprees on both coasts attributed to radical left-wing groups such as ALF and ELF, the FBI made those movements its top domestic terror priority. But right-wing groups remained a concern, according to one FBI official.

'That doesn't de-emphasize our interest in other domestic terror groups,' stressed the official, who would not be named discussing the bureau's counterterror strategy, during a phone interview Friday. 'For us, the right-wing patriot movement remains a continuing threat.' (The FBI considers militias, tax protesters, and anti-government groups part of the right-wing movement, the official said; the bureau considers violent anti-abortion extremists a separate movement.)

The DHS document, entitled 'Integrated Planning Guidance, Fiscal Years 2005-2011,' is dated January 2005. Its pages are marked 'Sensitive ' Do Not Distribute Outside the Department of Homeland Security ' Draft.' Each paragraph in the document is marked '(U/FOUO),' which typically indicates it has been reviewed by a government censor and determined to be unclassified, but 'for official use only.'

Under a section marked 'Threat and Vulnerability Assessment,' the document asks and answers the question 'Who are the adversaries?'

First and foremost, the draft document says, are al Qaeda and its affiliates.

Second are new radical Islamist groups that arise overseas amid the rubble of the old al Qaeda organization. These organizations 'could try to supplant' al Qaeda and 'would see a Homeland attack as a way to attain that goal,' the document states.

Domestic radical Islamic groups concern the department, because of their potential to support al Qaeda operations within the country, or to serve as a 'recruiting pool' for the movement.

'However,' the document reads, 'we are not convinced that any of these organizations acting alone would pursue a major attack against the Homeland.'

As a final item, the list notes the threat of eco-terrorists, who 'will continue to focus their attacks on property damage in an effort to change policy.' The document notes that although 'publicly ALF and ELF promote nonviolence toward human life . . . some members may escalate their attacks.'

Priorities Questioned
The document lists several groups or sources of radical violence that DHS does not consider threats to the homeland.

Lebanese Hizballah and various Palestinian groups, including Hamas and Palestine Islamic Jihad, are unlikely to attack the United States, the report's authors conclude.

Several high-profile terror prosecutions, including cases against the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation and Florida professor Sami al-Arian, rest on their connection to such groups.

'Why are we expending so many resources targeting people who have allegedly provided support to groups that don't threaten us?' asked David Cole, a professor of law at Georgetown University and a frequent critic of the U.S. government's war on terror. 'How does that make us safer?'

State-sponsored terrorism also is not an immediate concern to the department, according to the document. 'In the post 9/11 environment, countries do not appear to be facilitating or supporting terrorist groups intent on striking the U.S. homeland,' it reads. In fact, of all the countries designated state sponsors of terrorism, only Iran 'appears to have the possible future motivation' to use terrorist groups to plot against the United States.

In the past few years, according to MIPT researcher Ellis, left-wing violence has overtaken right-wing violence as the primary form of domestic terror. 'When a conservative government comes to power, you see more activity from the opposite side of the spectrum,' he explained. At the same time, the membership and activity of right-wing groups has suffered since the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, and the broadcasting of images of the children who died in the building's second-floor day care center.

'A lot of people said, 'I'm fighting against the Zionist Occupied Government, I'm not here to kill children,' Ellis explained.

Still, Ellis warned, the movements remain worthy of the government's concern. Last October, the FBI arrested a man in Tennessee who tried to buy sarin nerve gas and C-4 explosive to attack a government building. The man, Demetrius 'Van' Crocker, had also inquired about obtaining nuclear waste or other nuclear material, according to the FBI.

And in 2003, a Pennsylvania man was convicted of mailing hundreds of letters containing fake anthrax to abortion clinics around the United States.

Although their activities appear to be decreasing, such groups are still dangerous, said Ellis. 'We don't have the luxury of ignoring threats from either side of the political spectrum.'
Antifascist
The same phenomena is easier to observe in Iraq because there is less need to disguise their designed purpose. Private armies (these para-military groups gain public acceptence if called "Private Security Services" corporations like Blackwater Inc.) are being formed and are gaining hands on experience in Iraq. These same personnel will eventually return to the United States looking for work. I wonder what kind of work? Notice it is not our government, but "Human Rights" groups and the foreign press that are protesting this para-military group.
Our American press and opposition politicians are totally apathetic, unaware, and oblivious to these domestic political trends.
QUOTE
Fury at 'shoot for fun' memo
Outburst by US security firm in Iraq is attacked by human rights groups
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/internation...1451137,00.html
Mark Townsend
Sunday April 3, 2005
The Observer

One of the biggest private security firms in Iraq has created outrage after a memo to staff claimed it is 'fun' to shoot people.
Emails seen by The Observer reveal that employees of Blackwater Security were recently sent a message stating that 'actually it is "fun" to shoot some people.'

Dated 7 March and bearing the name of Blackwater's president, Gary Jackson, the electronic newsletter adds that terrorists 'need to get creamed, and it's fun, meaning satisfying, to do the shooting of such folk.'

Human rights groups said yesterday that the comments raised fresh questions over the role of civilian contractors operating in Iraq and other world flashpoints.

'We are very concerned about the increased use of security companies, there needs to be more inspection and regulation of these companies,' said a spokesman for Amnesty International.

Blackwater has already been the subject of lobbying efforts to introduce tighter regulations on private military operations in Iraq.

It is one of the fastest growing private security firms in the world, and achieved global prominence last year when four of its men were ambushed by a crowd of Iraqis and their bodies mutilated and dragged around the Iraqi city of Falluja.

The controversial wording of the Blackwater bulletin appears to be an attempt to criticise the 'righteous outcry' that followed a recent statement from a senior US Marine general who, on returning home from Iraq, claimed it was 'fun to shoot some people'. While the views of Lieutenant-General James Mattis drew a frosty response from the Pentagon, others said his observations reflected the harsh realities of war.

Blackwater's entry to the debate appears to suggest that satisfaction can be drawn from combat if 'the bad guys' get what they deserve.

'All of us who have ever waited through an hour and a half movie, or read some 300 pages of a thriller, to the point when the bad guys finally get their comeuppance know this perfectly well,' says the opening address of the six-page bulletin, which The Observer believes to be authentic.

Called Blackwater Tactical Weekly, the newsletter was sent to environmental activist Frank Hewetson as well as the firm's staff. Last year Hewetson was offered a job by Blackwater with a salary of up to �85,000 plus health benefits to work with its 'military crisis operations support team.' Although he declined, Hewetson remains on the firm's database.

The 7 March bulletin also features a plug for Blackwater's training academy which offers potential recruits an eight-week course that includes training in various firearms, close quarter protection, physical security as well as 'ground fighting.'

Among its various roles in post-war Iraq, Blackwater has guarded provincial outposts for the Iraqi coalition provisional authority and had the contract to keep former chief US envoy Paul Bremer alive.

The company has been praised for its role in the rescue of a wounded soldier in Najaf. Defence experts have described Blackwater as a major player in the field of private arms with an important role to play in aiding American security in the war on terror.

Other Blackwater emails seen by The Observer, from last year, indicate the large market for civilian contractors in war zones. 'We will probably require at least 3000-4000 professionals above and beyond what we have in the Blackwater employment and resource system,' states one.

There are thought to be as many as 20,000 private enterprise soldiers in Iraq, with the US military an advocate of their use. This system allows governments to save money on paying permanent soldiers, and offers the political bonus that it is unlikely to attract as much media attention as conventional troops.

The Observer made numerous attempts to contact Blackwater's head office in North Carolina, but no calls were returned. There is, however, no evidence that company staff have ever shot people for fun.

The firm is understood to have disciplined and well-trained recruits. A number are thought to be elite soldiers who have retired from military special-operations units. Blackwater also offers extensive psychological counselling programmes to combat potentially traumatic battlefield stress.

Antifascist


Chris Simcox
QUOTE
Abusive acts vs. entrants are ignored, activists say.
Officials say case impossible without crossers' testimony

By Michael Marizco
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/allheadlines/67826.php

The stories of illegal entrants abused by Cochise County vigilantes are buried in sheriff's deputy reports - complaints of guns drawn, dog bites, shouts and humiliation - in official language, using terms such as aggravated assault and disorderly conduct.

Since 1999, the Mexican consul in Douglas, Miguel Escobar, has documented 65 cases in which illegal border crossers reported being detained by U.S. citizens in Cochise County.

In at least six reports taken by Cochise County Sheriff's Department deputies, illegal entrants have reported being kicked, shouted at, bitten by dogs and had guns pointed at them - yet there's never been a single Cochise County resident prosecuted in these cases.

Human-rights activists say it's because there's a culture of looking the other way when it comes to illegal-entrant abuse. Cochise County law enforcement officials say it's because the victims - illegal entrants - choose not to pursue charges. And without witnesses, there are no cases.

The debate has led to civil lawsuits involving millions of dollars. And it has fueled concerns by activists that lax enforcement will allow participants in the upcoming Minuteman Project to abuse illegal entrants without fear of prosecution in Cochise County.

The Minuteman Project is being touted now as a "political assembly" promising to bring 1,022 people to the banks of the San Pedro River for a monthlong protest of border enforcement, starting Friday. But activist groups point to elements within the group and cite a potential for violence.

Last year, one of its leaders, Chris Simcox, was convicted on federal weapons charges. More recently, the white supremacy group Aryan Nation has openly recruited for the Minuteman Project, promoting the monthlong protest as a "white pride event."

Organizer James Gilchrist said he didn't know the Aryan Nation was promoting the event.

"That's a concern to us. Who knows what the group is capable of?" said Jennifer Allen, director of the Border Action Network. The activist group plans this week to file an international human-rights complaint against the United States in the Organization of American States, contending it is failing to prosecute vigilantes.

Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever said there's no point in pouring resources into prosecuting a case when the victims won't stay to testify.

"We were aware of the ramifications when this started," Dever said. "We wanted to make sure it was viable when it comes."

In the latest court action, a $32 million civil suit was filed earlier this month in U.S. District Court in Tucson against Dever and the most active armed rancher, Cochise County resident Roger Barnett, by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. The suit also targets Barnett's brother and wife and 10 other unnamed individuals.

The group of illegal entrants told sheriff's deputies that Barnett kicked one woman twice in March 2004. The whole time, he shouted obscenities at the illegal entrants he'd apprehended on his property and pointed his weapon at them while they were on his land, the entrants said.

Last week, the Cochise County Attorney's Office dropped prosecution in the case because it's not illegal to point a gun at a trespasser in Arizona and because after interviewing some of the alleged victims, investigators were unable to determine whether Barnett kicked the woman or motioned to her with his foot, said Cochise County Attorney Ed Rheinheimer.

The case mirrors other complaints against Barnett, who has never been prosecuted or arrested despite his own claims of detaining thousands of migrants on his ranch east of Douglas.

In a June 2004 case, deputies arrived at the Douglas Border Patrol station in response to an aggravated-assault report. Barnett had called the Border Patrol to report seven people he had picked up. One of the men with him grabbed a women in the group of entrants by the hair, pushed a gun into her ribs, forced her onto his all-terrain vehicle and drove her to the highway, a sheriff's report stated. A man in the group complained to deputies the man's dog had bitten him on the thigh.

The case was dismissed when each of the illegal entrants declined to pursue charges and would not testify.

That won't be an issue in a civil lawsuit, because the standards for proving assault in civil court are different from those in criminal court, said Araceli Perez, a staff attorney for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. The organization hopes to use the lawsuit to force Cochise County to prosecute cases against vigilantes, she said.

"Our clients believe they didn't go far enough to protect citizens," she said. That may be exacerbated with the Minuteman Project, she said. "There is a concern that you will have more violations because they won't prosecute these cases. That's when you're led to potential civil-rights violations."

Barnett, the first rancher to openly acknowledge he apprehends illegal entrants while armed, has served as the model for groups such as the Minuteman Project and the American Border Patrol, activists say.

U.S. Border Patrol spokes-man Jose Garza said his agency routinely calls law enforcement when U.S. citizens are in the presence of the illegal entrants they apprehend, but the agency doesn't track the encounters itself. In the future, the Border Patrol's Tucson Sector plans to carefully track every encounter between Minuteman volunteers and illegal entrants in case of future legal repercussions, he said.

In the March 2004 case, a county prosecutor investigated and concluded that there was no physical injury to the woman and Barnett may not have kicked her but rather motioned to her with his foot because she was separated from the group, Rheinheimer said.


The illegal entrants may feel threatened and scared, but "with the people who live on the border and who have had confrontations with groups of illegal immigrants coming across their land . . . there is just no question that there is a justification in threatening to use deadly force for the purpose of calling Border Patrol," Rheinheimer said. "Threatening (force) isn't using, a delicate but important distinction," he said.

"We get heat from both sides on this," Rheinheimer added.

Regarding the Minuteman Project, the Cochise county attorney said: "I would hope that the people who do come down here know exactly where the boundaries are."

One case he won't speak about, because it's still under investigation, is an October 2004 incident in which Barnett is accused of chambering a round and pointing his AR-15 at a group of two men and three children, all U.S. citizens, who were hunting on land Barnett leases from the state.

Barnett was cited by deputies on eight felony counts of aggravated assault. The group members said Barnett screamed at them, chambered a round and ordered them off "his" land while the children cowered on the floorboard of the truck they'd rode in on, the deputy's report states.

Five months later, prosecutors are still reviewing the case.

"How long does it take them to review this?" said Ed English, the father of one of the children.

The man at the center of the controversy, Barnett, knows he walks a narrow line but says he stays comfortably within the law. When law enforcement is nowhere around, "it's the law that protects you. As far as I'm concerned, this is just a harassment tactic," Barnett said of the lawsuits. "I've got a right to do whatever I have to do."

Antifascist

The 18-year-old Peter Fechter was shot in the pelvis and was left to lie in the no-man's land between East and West Germany for nearly an hour as he bled to death. His screams of pain, left unanswered, horrified onlookers. Fechter's fate symbolized for many the cruelty created by the Berlin Wall. 171 people were killed or died attempting to escape at the Berlin Wall between August 13, 1961 and November 9, 1989.

Border Death-Trap — Time To Tear Down America’s Berlin Wall


See 2,600 deaths between 1994-2003.
UPDATE: In 2004, 325 persons are reported to have died by the US Border Patrol. And in another source, 451 additional deaths reported in 2005 for a total of 3376 deaths between 1994 to 2005.
QUOTE
...Since the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed by the first Bush and the now reviled Carlos Salinas in 1992, over 4000 Mexican workers, many of them campesinos displaced from the land by NAFTA agricultural imports, have died trying to cross that line to find a job no North American citizen will work. They have drowned in the All-American Canal and the river that Mexico calls the Rio Bravo and the U.S. the Rio Grande. They have been bitten by vipers running through south Texas, suffocated to death in boxcars, died in car crashes after high speed chases or simply been shot down by the Migra and their volunteer vigilantes. They have fallen into ravines or froze to death in the winter snow up in the Rumarosa, the most dangerous part of the border to which it is U.S. immigration policy to chase them in a strategy to "up the risks" of migration. And mostly they have dropped out there in the cruel desert never to rise again as the vultures circle slowly in the spotless heavens above. Lost and Found in the Arizona Desert
Communist and Capitalist Refugees

During the 1960s the American government propaganda machine used the Berlin Wall as the symbol of the evils of communism. The East Germans were walled in and were constantly trying to escape a totalitarian communist society. This was evidence, the U.S. said, of a failed society—people risking their lives and dying while attempting to escape poverty and repression. This fact was also justification for the violent overthrown of such an evil government and billions of tax dollars were spend by Americans to undermined Soviet communism and pressure these dictatorships to change their political system. The United States spared no effort, expense, and even lives battling such an evil society.

Yet the United States is next doors to one of the poorest and repressive countries in North America—Mexico. For decades Mexicans have fled Mexico because of poverty, and repression looking for a better life in America. The American government, California in particular, has spent billions if not trillions of dollars over decades receiving Mexican refugees. Mexico is a proto-Fascist county on our very doorstep! Thousands of Mexicans have been killed fleeing Mexico and crossing the American border. But somehow this history fact doesn’t elicit the same concern for human rights by America. The American government has the power and resources to seal the Mexican/American border. But more importantly, the United States has the power to influence the Mexican government to change its governmental policies that is causing a massive exodus of Mexican refugees.

The United States did attempted to build a triple fence to block immigration, but this looks more like a symbolic jester and a pork barrel spending project.
QUOTE
“The triple fence, which began with the hare-brained allocation of $4.3 million a decade ago for a single mile of it, is now becoming a 14-mile-long scar along the border costing upward of $25 million, depending on how much is needed to offset the loss of rare wildlife habitat. Opposed as waste by the Clinton administration, Hunter pushed it through as San Diego pork, though immigration experts have always doubted its value.
Its effect, they said, would be to push illegal immigrants farther east, where there is no fence.

Which is precisely what happened.
In 1994, Operation Gatekeeper, an attempt to prevent illegal immigration along the entire Southwest border, became law. Gatekeeper led to construction of the single fence between San Ysidro and Otay, a doubling of border agents, new equipment such as vehicles and border lighting, and stiffer prosecution and repatriation provisions aimed at illegal crossers.
Wayne Cornelius, director of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at UCSD, has compiled statistics on Gatekeeper based on Border Patrol apprehensions, a useful measure of illegal crossing attempts. The numbers show that in the decade between 1994 and last year, border apprehensions fell scarcely at all, from 979,101 in 1994 to 905,065 last year.
At Gatekeeper's estimated cost of between $500 million and $1 billion, border apprehensions have fallen 7 percent along the Southwest border – hardly cost-effective policy.
So how did those 10 million illegal immigrants get here?
The statistics tell us. The border fence pushed illegal immigrants from the San Diego sector eastward, into the deserts. Apprehensions in Arizona climbed from 160,000 in 1994 to 376,000 last year, even as Texas apprehensions rose slightly and California apprehensions were cut in half. During the same period, the number of Mexicans who died trying to cross the border, mostly in the deserts and mountains, rose to more than 2,400.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0219-02.htm”

The United States government deliberately is allowing massive immigration into the United States to keep wages depressed and exploit Mexican and American labor. Also, the United States is comfortable with a proto-fascist government like Mexico in which American corporations have profitable economic agreements and a un-regulation business environment.

Government Censorship of Arizona Minutemen coverage

Since the Arizona Minutemen announced the “Minuteman Project” to send 500 to 1500 armed “citizen volunteers” to the Arizona-Mexican border, the mainstream media has covered the event as a “citizen neighborhood watch program.” The media coverage has very carefully tipped toed around these very oblivious issues of why there are such a massive number of economic refugees fleeing Mexico. The mainstream media avoids giving historical context, or provide any interviews with the powerful government office leaders that are supposed to be responsible for immigration.

We instead get 30-second reports of border patrols and extremely ambiguous reports of what the U.S. government is doing in response to Minuteman project. For, example, the U. S. government announced that is sending an additional border patrol agents to the Mexican/American border.
QUOTE
“The minutemen say one goal is to draw attention to the underfunding of the Border Patrol. But officials counter they don't need the help: Last week, the agency's Tucson sector announced a 25 percent increase in staffing in Arizona, which includes 155 permanent personnel and 200 temporary. Twenty-three new aircraft are surveying the area as well.”
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0404/p01s03-usgn.html

But, is this increase of government agents now a de facto joint exercise between U.S. government agents and para-military groups? I have seen the picture of Chris Simcox interviewed at least three times on TV media, but not once did the report mention that Simcox was convicted in April 2004 for carrying a concealed weapon on federal land while engaged in a vigilante patrol and giving false information to a park ranger( http://www.civilrights.org/publications/re...n_2004/ch2.html ). Also, the mainstream media does not mention that the project has been infiltrated by white supremacists organizations ( http://arizona.indymedia.org/news/2004/05/18588.php).

There are many other persons of interest involved in this project, but no in-depth investigation is forthcoming. Where is the competition between news organizations to get the news story first? The mainstream media is just as regulated and censored as any of the media in Communist Russia. The only the audience is different.

Where is Bush when a country like Mexico is demanding Liberty and Democracy?

Didn't America protest the communist East Germany for its tyrannical government and failed economic system causing refugees to flee to the West?

Would a Democratic country in place of a fascist Mexican government help solve our immigration problems?

Here is a chance for the American government to make a small effort to fix our immigration problem, yet, silence from Bush. It is as if BushCo likes it this way: desperate people fleeing to America to flood the economy with desperate illegal workers and protect the power of the fascist undemocratic government of Mexico.

Thousands of followers [more than a million] of Mexico City's left wing Mayor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador fill the capital's Zocalo, or main square, April 24, 2005, during a rally to protest against his impeachment and pending prosecution for contempt of court. Protesters crammed into Mexico City's vast central square and narrow streets in the historic downtown, many waving banners condemning the legal case against Lopez Obrador.

See article More than 1 Million Rally to Support Mexico City's Mayor
Antifascist
The first phase of Fascism is the rise of para-military groups, a thug class, to help out the government against a common enemy.

The second phase of Fascism is the government to legitimize these ultra-right-wing para-military groups. Schwarzenegger has attempted to do that today.

Chris Simcox, see post above, has already gone to congress to give an "ultimatium" to the government. Read this article from "The Ohio State University's Program for International and Homeland Security" Webpage!!!! There is nothing I could find on the internet actually covering Simcox's testimony in Washington last April 25-27, 2005.[My comment added in brackets]
QUOTE
"If there are bureaucratic obstacles to enforcing the law, I want to get rid of those," Chertoff added. [Yes, that is our Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and he is not condeming the Minutemen!]
Meanwhile, the Minutemen organizers are coming to Washington April 25-27 to meet with members of Congress. Organizer Chris Simcox said the group will present an "ultimatum."

"We will continue to do the job that you don't seem to have the will to do until you relieve us from duty by meeting our demands," Simcox said during a press conference Monday in Tombstone, Ariz. "And that's augmenting Border Patrol with National Guard and military personnel. Until that time, citizens will continue to man the border. No compromise."

He added: "Our government owes us the protection of securing this border. Period."

The Minuteman Project plans to continue operations on two fronts. First, the group will begin "interior patrols" that consist of picketing employers that hire illegal aliens. Beginning Oct. 1, the group plans to set up citizen observation posts in California, New Mexico and Texas. The Arizona observation posts are scheduled to resume in May after a brief hiatus.

The group also wants a 400 percent increase in budgets for the Border Patrol and ICE. http://homelandsecurity.osu.edu/focusareas/border.html


QUOTE
Governor endorses Minutemen on border
Schwarzenegger parts with Bush on group of armed volunteers that stops immigrants.

Carla Marinucci and Mark Martin, Chronicle Political Writers
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...5/04/29/GUV.TMP

Friday, April 29, 2005

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, just a week after apologizing for suggesting California should "close the borders,'' warmly praised the Minutemen project -- an armed citizens group -- on Thursday for doing a terrific job of stopping illegal immigration from Mexico.

Although President Bush has criticized the group as vigilantes, Schwarzenegger said, "They've done a terrific job. And they have cut down the crossing of illegal immigrants by a huge percentage.''

Schwarzenegger, appearing on the conservative Los Angeles KFI radio's "John and Ken'' talk show, was asked his views of the Minutemen, who are using armed volunteers along the border in Arizona. The governor endorsed the effort, saying, "It just shows that it works.''

"Our federal government is not doing their job," Schwarzenegger said. "It's a shame that the private citizen has to go in there and start patrolling our borders."

Schwarzenegger's comments drew a rebuke from Latino politicians, as had those last week, and put the governor in a public disagreement with Bush. The president and the U.S. Border Patrol have criticized the Minutemen as interfering with law enforcement, and posing a danger to citizens and immigrants aiming to cross the border illegally.

Members of the Minutemen were delighted at Schwarzenegger's comments, noting he was the first governor to support them.

"Gov. Schwarzenegger is the most responsible politician in the West,'' said Grey Deacon, speaking Thursday from the group's headquarters in Tombstone, Ariz. "He is willing to stand up for what is correct in America.''

Deacon called Schwarzenegger's comments very courageous, noting that as a legal immigrant to the country, the governor "understands immigration policy better than most citizens.''

Deacon said the group planned to extend its effort to California by Oct. 1 and hoped the governor would welcome them.

Rob Stutzman, communications director with the governor, said Schwarzenegger had not been in contact with the group and had no current plans to contact them.

Schwarzenegger does not support illegal activity, Stutzman said, and he was merely "praising acts with citizens that are working diligently to solve a problem that their government is not solving.''

But California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said the Republican governor should be urging the Republican president to put more federal agents on the border rather than endorsing the efforts of untrained volunteers.

Schwarzenegger, who more than 25 years ago immigrated to the United States as an aspiring bodybuilder from Austria, last week kicked off a controversy when he told newspaper publishers in San Francisco that California needed to close the borders to control illegal immigration. After he was severely criticized, the governor apologized and said he meant government needed to do more to secure the borders.

Schwarzenegger, in Thursday's 20-minute interview, was critical of what he characterized as the federal government's failure to control illegal immigration. He said he was deeply concerned watching recent Fox News videos showing "hundreds and hundreds of illegal immigrants coming across the border. I mean, what's that?''

Federal officials "owe it to the people to secure the borders ... they're not doing their job. They're leaving it way open, anyone can walk across,'' he said. "It's not just the problem of immigrants. It's also a problem that any terrorists can come in."

Asked what he would do to secure the border, the governor offered, "The most important thing is what they're doing with the Minutemen now ... have more people controlling it.''

But Schwarzenegger appeared stumped when he was asked why Bush had criticized the armed citizens as vigilantes.

"I really cannot tell you exactly what his thinking is," Schwarzenegger said of the president. "The next time I see him, I will have this conversation.''

Prominent Latinos and legislators immediately assailed the governor's statements as alarming.

"It is illegal to interfere with law enforcement, and if the governor is promoting that, then maybe we should think of bringing action against him,'' said Art Torres, state Democratic Party chairman. "When he took an oath of office to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States, that includes all of its laws. And when the president of the United States and the Border Patrol both suggest that these activities are not only not helpful, but possibly illegal, that needs to be seriously examined.'''

Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, D-Southgate (Los Angeles County), lambasted the governor's words as "the rantings of a desperate politician'' and an effort "to scapegoat people when you're down.''

"This isn't an action movie," De La Torre said. "It isn't cool that there are people out in the desert with guns.''

Political analysts said that with the governor's poll numbers dropping and his reform agenda stalled, the governor's comments on a conservative radio talk show about illegal immigration signaled a willingness to reprise the strategy of former Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, who hammered at the issue and fired up the GOP base in his 1994 successful bid for re-election.

But they called the move puzzling -- and politically risky at best.

"What happened to redistricting?'' said Barbara O'Connor, political communication professor at California State University Sacramento, referring to the governor's main political goal in the past weeks. "He's clearly not focused his message, and he's doing serial attacks on things he's unhappy with.''

"It's very odd that the governor would move in this direction,'' added Phil Trounstine, who now heads the San Jose State University Survey and Policy Research Institute.

As public support drops, "there's two ways the governor could go: One is to take a hard line and dig in on the conservative side. The other is to play a more centrist, bipartisan role,'' said Trounstine, who was a communications adviser to former Democratic Gov. Gray Davis. "If the radio show is any indication, the governor has decided for the former, not the latter.''

Stutzman said the governor had intended to discuss his dismay with advertising for Spanish-language Channel 62, which has been prominently placed on major Los Angeles freeways.

The ads, which had riled some anti-illegal immigration advocates, shows a panorama of the Los Angeles skyline dominated by Mexico City's most prominent landmark -- the famed golden angel. The headline says: "Your news, your team. Los Angeles, CA.'' But California is crossed out and replaced with "Mexico.''

Schwarzenegger called on the station to pull the ads, calling them "extremely divisive and unnecessary. The big mistake is that it promotes illegal aliens to come in here, and it's the last thing that we need,'' he told the KFI-AM hosts. "They should take it down immediately.''

But Nativo Lopez, state national president of the Mexican American Political Association, said the ads were trying to persuade the Spanish-speaking and largely Mexican American audience that Channel 62 is "your news in Los Angeles.''

"This is a tempest that has been exaggerated by KFI,'' he said. "Now, the governor has aligned himself with them, and it's shameful. Latinos should have no illusions of what he stands for.''
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Governor on illegal immigration
The first comments: On April 19, Schwarzenegger told a group of newspaper publishers, "Close the borders. Close the borders in California, and all across Mexico and the United States.''

The apology: The next day, Schwarzenegger said, "I meant 'securing' our borders, not 'closing' them." He later joked that he should "go back to school and study" his English again.

Latest comments: Speaking on a radio show Thursday about an armed group of citizens patrolling the border, Schwarzenegger said, "They've done a terrific job. And they have cut down the crossing of illegal immigrants by a huge percentage.''

Antifascist

Save Our State (Minuteman offshoot in California)/Minuteman supporters went to their vehicles and fetched out their Confederate and Nazi flags:
QUOTE
Homeland Security Terrorist List Excludes Right-Wing Vigilantes
Source

Congressional Quarterly reports that a Department of Homeland Security memo listing terrorists and terrorist groups excludes right-wing terrorist organizations. The memo includes several left-wing organizations, such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) as terrorist threats, but excludes numerous anti-government groups, white supremacists and other radical right-wing movements, which have staged numerous terrorist attacks that have killed scores of Americans. By comparison, the ELF has limited its actions to attacks on cars, businesses and property.

CQ details the crimes of some of the right-wing groups not included on the list:

The conspirators behind the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people and wounded more than 500, were inspired by radical right-wing movements. Eric Rudolph, the man charged with carrying out the 1996 Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta, which killed one woman and injured more than 100, was a member of the radical anti-abortion group Army of God. Initially, Rudolph was the object of a massive North Carolina manhunt in connection with a Birmingham, Ala., abortion-clinic bombing that killed a police officer and seriously maimed a nurse.
Another Army of God member, James Kopp, was convicted in the 1998 shooting of a doctor who performed abortions.

Individuals affiliated with such groups have also been involved in many smaller terrorist acts, including mailing hundreds of bogus anthrax letters to abortion clinics, and in plots to obtain and use conventional, chemical and nuclear weapons against civilians. In 2003, for instance, a Texas man prosecutors say was a white supremacist and anti-government radical pleaded guilty to charges of possessing a weapon of mass destruction. Authorities had discovered enough sodium cyanide bombs to kill hundreds of people; machine guns and several hundred thousand rounds of ammunition; 60 pipe bombs; and remote-control explosive devices disguised as briefcases in a storage space he rented. The man, William J. Krar, was sentenced to 11 years in federal prison.


Mike German, a 16-year undercover agent for the FBI who spent most of his career infiltrating radical right-wing groups, questions the wisdom of excluding right-wing organzations. “They are still a threat, and they will continue to be a threat,” said German. “If for some reason the government no longer considers them a threat, I think they will regret that."

James O. Ellis III, a senior terror researcher for the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism, adds that while right-wing groups are more likely to target human lives than left-wing terrorists, leftist incidents have increased in recent years. “When a conservative government comes to power, you see more activity from the opposite side of the spectrum,” he explained.

Well, gee—maybe that's because these right-wing groups are fundamentalist Republican shock troops--the paramilitary wing. An awful lot of Bush-ites around here, in central OR, have some heavy-duty firepower stashed in their homes.

Shouldn't come as a surprise, should it?

Hearings to extend The USA/Patriot Act are currently underway.

Since an accord saving the filibuster is reached, we can only hope that Senator Joe Lieberman, one of the so-called "Mod Squad," will vociferously mount one against this most unAmerican piece of legislation.

Antifascist
David Neiwert is a freelance journalist based in Seattle and he has done research of right-wing extremist groups for years. He has been following the Minuteman organization and its leaders in a six part series on his website, Orcinus.
QUOTE
[Note: Part I began to count and describe the ways we know that the Minutemen are an extremist organizing strategy. No. 1 was their origins; No. 2 was their leadership; No. 3 was their following. No. 4 was their vigilantism. This part 5 will examine the extent to which mainstream conservatives are embracing this extremism.]

Part V: The Mainstream Embrace

The Minutemen have chronically run low on volunteers for all their events. That didn't prevented them from declaring victory anyway, even before they officially wrapped up their three-ring anti-immigration circus in April:

"In just 17 days, the Minuteman Project has successfully sealed the San Pedro River Valley border from illegal activity," Minuteman organizer Jim Gilchrist said on the project's Web site in mid-April, halfway through the monthlong venture.

Gilchrist pointed to a drop in Border Patrol apprehensions in the area as proof: The agency caught about 2,500 illegal immigrants in the Naco area during the first half of the month; agents apprehended nearly 7,700 during the same period last year.

But others weren't so sure:

"They're taking credit for securing the border, and surely no one with any credibility believes that," said Michael Nicley, chief of the U.S. Border Patrol's Tucson sector, which encompasses most of the Arizona border.

... Nicley and others attributed the drop to U.S. agents and the increased presence of Mexican police and members of Grupo Beta, a Mexican government-sponsored organization that tries to discourage people from crossing illegally and aids those stranded in the desert.

Authorities suggested that illegal immigrants are simply going around the Minutemen's lines.

"They are going west of Naco, but they are still trying," said Bertha de la Rosa, a coordinator with Grupo Beta.

But in a way, Gilchrist is right: the Minuteman Project was indeed a success. Not for actually doing anything substantive about immigration. Rather, it's been eminently successful in mainstreaming and legitimizing extremist vigilantism.

While the extremism that is buried deep within the beating heart of the Minuteman movement is disturbing enough, the most disquieting aspect of the whole phenomenon is how avidly it has been embraced by certain elements of mainstream conservatism.

The Minuteman have been touted in the media, which have generally insisted on portraying them as sincere citizens who are trying to defend the nation's borders. They've also been supported by a variety of Republican politicians, as well as officials within the Bush administration.

President Bush himself, however, told reporters this summer that he opposes the Minutemen:

"I'm against vigilantes in the United States of America," Bush said during a meeting in Texas with Mexican President Vincente Fox and Canadian Prime Minster Paul Martin. "I'm for enforcing law in a rational way. It's why we've got a Border Patrol, and they ought to be in charge of enforcing the border."

Simcox said Bush's statement was disrespectful to citizens who simply want to help solve border problems. "We challenge the president to join us and come down and see for himself what's really going on," he told CNN.

Fox has also expressed concern over citizen border patrols. He told reporters he was watching the Minuteman Project carefully and would take action in U.S. courts or international tribunals if any activists break the law.

"We totally reject the idea of these migrant-hunting groups," Fox said. "We will use the law -- international law and even U.S. law -- to make sure that these types of groups ... will not have any opportunity to progress."

"We don't have any evidence or any indication either that terrorists from al Qaeda or any other part of the world are coming into Mexico and going into the United States," Fox said, countering recent statements made by senior Bush administration officials. "If there is any of that evidence, we will like to have it. But as I said, it does not exist."

Those remarks earned an immediate rebuke from Rep. Tom Tancredo, the Colorado Republican who has been the Minutemen's most vocal supporter. But they also were countered by then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, interviewed in the Washington Times, who even went so far as to suggest that President Bush might want to change his tune:

Mr. Hanner: Do you agree with the president that the Minuteman Project on the border right now are vigilantes?

Mr. DeLay: No. I'm not sure the president meant that. I think that they're providing an excellent service. It's no different than neighborhood-watch programs and I appreciate them doing it, as long as they can do it safely and don't get involved and do it the way they seem to be doing it, and that's just identifying people for the Border Patrol to come pick up.

DeLay is not alone. One United States Senator is ready to give them official imprimatur. Sen. Wayne Allard, a Colorado Republican, came up with the idea in mid-April:

A Republican senator said Wednesday the government should consider deputizing private citizens, like the Minuteman Patrol in Arizona, to help secure U.S. borders.

Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., said the U.S. Border Patrol also should look to local law enforcement and state officials for help along the most porous parts of the U.S.-Mexico line.

"I wonder sometimes if maybe we're not looking too much to a federal solution," Allard told Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing.

"I happen to believe that those people down along the border that formed the Minutemen organization have some real concerns," Allard said.

A Texas congressman named John Culberson of Houston introduced legislation that would give official sanction, for the first time, to "border militias":

The Border Protection Corps Act, introduced on July 28, would authorize access to $6.8 billion in unused Homeland Security funds to form volunteer border militias that report to their respective county sheriffs.

It is not known when or if the measure would be put to a vote.

Gov. Rick Perry stopped short of endorsing the bill, noting in a prepared statement that illegal immigration was a "pervasive problem."

"Regardless of the mechanism, the federal government must provide a stronger presence along the border," Perry said in the statement issued July 28. "I welcome federal efforts to protect our borders from illegal immigrations and threats from terrorists."

Then there have been the public endorsements by California's Republican governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

In an interview on Los Angeles radio station KFI, Schwarzenegger said of the armed volunteers, "They've done a terrific job." According to the Governator, who drew criticism last week when he suggested it was time for the U.S. to "close the borders," the federal government isn't taking border security seriously enough. "Our federal government is not doing their job," Schwarzenegger said. "It's a shame that the private citizen has to go in there and start patrolling our borders."

Schwarzenegger pegged his concerns to the time he watched Fox News footage showing "hundreds and hundreds of illegal immigrants" coming across the border. "I mean, what's that?" he asked.

A couple of months later, Schwarzenegger defended the Minutemen again, comparing them to a "neighborhood watch":

"It's no different than if you have a neighborhood watch person there that's watching your children at the playground," he responded. "I don't see it any different."

We've been hearing nearly the identical line from the mainstream conservative pundit corps -- particularly Michelle Malkin, Sean Hannity of Fox News, as well as Lou Dobbs of CNN -- who have been adamant that the Minutemen haven't a racist bone in their bodies, insisting like Schwarzenegger that they're just a gigantic "neighborhood watch."

Perhaps no one has been more prominent in promoting the Minutemen's image as a group of law-abiding, concerned citizens than CNN's Dobbs, who has made the Minutemen into the symbol of his ongoing campaign on behalf of immigration reform -- meaning he has adopted, essentially, far-right anti-immigrant nativism.

On several occasions, Dobbs' program has featured remarks from Minuteman organizer Chris Simcox, including an extended interview with Simcox that featured some genuinely noteworthy exchanges. Dobbs had reported on his program that the Minutemen were unarmed, and Simcox had to correct this:

DOBBS: And to be clear, you're not permitting any of your volunteers to be armed.

SIMCOX: No, that's not true. I can't do that. We have encouraged them, if you've read our standard operating procedure, that they are to be, again, aware of the laws of the state of Arizona. They're not to carry long arms, because that would make us an offensive -- that would give it an offensive-type attitude.

DOBBS: Well, Chris, let's...

SIMCOX: ... (UNINTELLIGIBLE), but...

DOBBS: ... be straight up, 1,500 volunteers, untrained, unorganized, and without drill, that is not a reassuring statement that you just made, if you're going to have people with weapons, whether they are sidearms or not.

SIMCOX: Well, Lou, we have -- most of our volunteers are retired law enforcement officers, military veterans, and professional people who -- and not all of them are going to be armed, but the ones that want to be have that right to be.

But we have interaccountability by grouping people together in teams, so that we have people watching each other and making sure that we hold each other accountable. Because this is a political protest, no matter what. We know that. And it would be hypocritical of us to want the government to enforce the laws if we were out there to break the laws.

What was really appalling, though, was the way Dobbs fawned on Simcox, especially at the end:

DOBBS: Outstanding. We wish you all of the success in the world. And you know, you said it at the outset, that it's a shame that it takes activism on the part of citizens. You know, I think that we could also make a counterargument. It's kind of nice to know that Americans still have that activism in their hearts, the capacity to volunteer to do the right thing. And we thank you, Chris Simcox, for being with us.

Nor have the typically "right leaning" media figures been alone in plumping the Minutemen's image. There have been sympathetic portrayals in such diverse media outlets the Ventura County Star, the Christian Science Monitor, and the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, all three of which portrayed Minuteman volunteer Joe McCutchen -- an Arkansan with a long record of involvement in far-right causes, including Jared Taylor's American Renaissance and the Council of Conservative Citizens -- as an ordinary "concerned citizen."

Typical of the media treatment was a remarkably nearsighted Monterey Weekly piece that offered the following assessment:

Indeed, it soon seemed that the hysteria over the armed and dangerous Minutemen was much ado about nothing. Retired men and women sitting on the backs of pickup trucks in six-hour shifts, concentrated along a two-mile stretch of border fence eyeing the vacant desert, appeared more like a group on a bird watching excursion than a paramilitary force.

The author of the piece, Andy Isaacson, thus blithely ignores one of the realities about dealing with organizations like the Minutemen: when they're posing in front of the cameras, they're very careful about what they say and how they appear. It's what they're doing and saying when no one is looking that is the problem.

I had a little experience with this in my dealings with a previous permutation of the militia movement. The Washington State Militia, for instance, held public rallies and talked before the cameras about how they were just trying to be a "neighborhood watch" out to protect their fellow citizens. Behind closed doors, as we later learned, they were building pipe bombs and talking about blowing up railroad tunnels as well as their fellow citizens.

The Minutemen's public face works exactly the same: Have your spokesmen work hard to present a sincere and concerned image of ordinary citizens who are just "fed up," while behind closed doors they let their hair down. The core of the Minutemen comprises a corps of True Believers from the extremist right. The leaders spout talk about the "war on terror" in public, but the followers mostly (in private, of course) spout talk about their neighborhoods and homes being "invaded" by criminal brown people.

A good example of this popped up in a recent story out of Tennessee involving a formative Minuteman operation there. Tennessee, of course, has no international border; and so its Minutemen, unsurprisingly, are focused on the "invasion" of Latinos from elsewhere:

Before a meeting in Hamblen County Tuesday night, 6 News asked meeting leader Carl Whitaker if he's operating a hate group, like some people say.

"We're not a hate group. We're a concerned group. We're concerned what's happening," Whitaker says. "If people are here illegally and they want to get legal, we would be glad to try to help them follow through the process. We don't hate anybody."

He says the Tennessee Volunteer Minutemen are working to expose companies that hire illegal aliens and take jobs away from taxpaying Americans. "We've turned in five different places of employment here that are hiring illegals."

But another supporter told a different story. Off-camera, James Drinnon says there are more Mexicans than African-Americans in Hamblen County. But he didn't really say African-American. He used the "N" word.

On camera, Drinnon says, "I think they ought to get them all out. Most of them in here. That's where all the dope's coming from. Most of them's Hispanic."

The kid-glove treatment, in fact, has so largely been pervasive among the media and politicians both. A more recent example occurred recently in Arizona, during a visit by Republican legislators from Colorado to a ranch owned by a figure closely associated not just with the Minutemen, but also bona fide hate groups:

The tour was organized by Glenn Spencer, whose home is about 1,000 feet from the border. He recently organized a number of border-watching activities, including a few with the Minuteman group.

Spencer said he had been a military researcher who worked at the Pentagon before moving to Arizona to set up a nonprofit group that investigates illegal immigration.

He showed aerial photographs and videos of immigrants crossing the border illegally near his home. He also showed visitors a miniature reconnaissance plane with a camera attached to it that he spent $40,000 to develop and build.

"We do this to expose the malfeasance of U.S. border patrol officials, who have failed us in protecting our borders," he said. "What can U.S. citizens do to help? A lot."

Spencer also told the Colorado legislators and a group of Republican political candidates from Arizona about a volunteer who crossed the border into Mexico and brought back a "simulated weapon of mass destruction."

"We did it to see if anybody would try to stop us," Spencer said. "This happened supposedly along the most heavily policed border area in the United States."

There also have been federal officials who have voiced support for the Minutemen. A top Border Patrol official at one point endorsed the Minuteman concept:

"We need more Border Patrol agents, there's no question about that," Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert Bonner told members of the House Government Reform Committee. CBP is in charge of the Border Patrol.

Bonner said his team has worked up a proposed increase in agents. He said the number is in the thousands but declined to be more specific, saying he still has to walk the plan through the Homeland Security Department.

... Bonner said CBP also is evaluating the effectiveness of using citizen patrols in a more formal way. He referred to the Minuteman Project, which set up citizen camps along a 23-mile stretch of the Arizona-Mexico border in April to observe and report illegal activity.

Minuteman organizers claim their efforts helped the Border Patrol apprehend 335 individuals illegally trying to enter the country, and deterred others who would have tried.

"The actions of the Minutemen were, I believe, well motivated," Bonner said. "There were no incidents, there were no acts of vigilantism, and that's a tribute to the organizers and leaders of the Minuteman Project."

Bonner later gave outright support to the idea of actually giving the Minuteman concept official imprimatur:

The top U.S. border enforcement official said Wednesday that his agency is exploring ways to involve citizen volunteers in creating "something akin to a Border Patrol auxiliary" -- a significant shift after a high-profile civilian campaign this spring along the Arizona-Mexico border.

Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert C. Bonner told The Associated Press that his agency began looking into citizen involvement after noting how eager volunteers were to stop illegal immigration.

"We value having eyes and ears of citizens, and I think that would be one of the things we are looking at is how you better organize, let's say, a citizen effort," Bonner said.

He said that could involve training of volunteers organized "in a way that would be something akin to a Border Patrol auxiliary."

Bonner characterized the idea of an auxiliary as "an area we're looking at," and a spokeswoman said it hadn't been discussed yet with top Homeland Security officials.

A day later, his superiors at the Department of Homeland Security backed away from any such proposals:

"There are currently no plans by the Department of Homeland Security to use civilian volunteers to patrol the border," spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said in a statement. "That job should continue to be done by the highly trained, professional law enforcement officials of the Border Patrol and its partner agencies."

Bonner retired shortly thereafter.

Hey, I saw our old friend Chris Simcox on the new tonight. He is the Neo-facscist that is the spokesman for the Minutemen vigilante movement. The media is always going to him, but not revealing his background and historical connections. Here is an update on his recent activities that the TV news media ignores--his daughter is saying her father tried to rape her.


For the complete report on this fascist see Southern Poverty Law Center
Antifascist
QUOTE
The Minutemen's father figure
Thursday, December 15, 2005
Orcinus

Suzy Buchanan and David Holthouse of the Southern Poverty Law Center went a-digging into the personal history of Minuteman leader Chris Simcox, and their final report reveals plenty of troubling information.

The portrait of Simcox that emerges is of a paranoid self-promoter who sees himself as an overlooked genius finally coming into his own. He also is prone to extremely unstable behavior:

Court records obtained by the Center's Intelligence Project show Simcox's second ex-wife, Kim Dunbar, filed an emergency appeal in September 2001 to obtain full custody of their teenage son because she feared that Simcox had suffered a mental breakdown and was dangerous.
Dunbar declined to be interviewed for this article, but her sworn affidavits speak for themselves. In one, Dunbar testified that throughout their 10-year marriage, Simcox was prone to sudden, violent rages. "He once took a knife from the kitchen and threatened to kill himself," she testified. "When he was angry, he broke furniture, car windows, he banged his head against the wall repeatedly and punched things."

Dunbar said that when their son was 4 years old, Simcox slapped him so hard that a mark remained on his face for two days. Another time, she testified, she grabbed her young son in her arms and jumped out a window because Simcox was throwing furniture at them. After such episodes, she said, Simcox would become despondent. "He would stare at walls, mumbling to himself." In the affidavits, Dunbar said she repeatedly pressured Simcox to seek professional help and even tried to have him hospitalized. But he persistently refused treatment. "Eventually," she said, "the only thing I could do was file for divorce."

Simcox and Dunbar initially shared custody of their son. There was no legal dispute until shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, when Dunbar suddenly filed a flurry of emergency appeals. "While Chris has always been prone to strong opinions and ranting behavior, this last episode has gone even farther," she told the court. "I am convinced he has had some kind of mental lapse and I am now, more than ever, afraid for my son to be in Chris' care." Dunbar grew frightened after Simcox left her a series of bizarre voicemail messages beginning that Sept. 13, in which he went on angry diatribes about the Constitution, patriotism, and impending nuclear attacks on Los Angles, and talked about training their 15-year-old son in the use of firearms. "I will begin teaching him the art of protecting himself with weapons," Simcox said in one recorded message he left for Dunbar. "I purchased another gun. I have more than a few weapons, and I intend on teaching my son how to use them." Simcox added, "I will no longer trust anyone in this country. My life has changed forever, and if you don't get that, you are brainwashed like everybody else." In phone conversations with his son that his ex-wife recorded and submitted to the court as evidence of Simcox's mental instability, he challenged the boy to become "a man and a real American." "You better stop playing baseball, buddy, and you better do something real, 'cause life will never be the same," Simcox thundered. "I'm going to go down to the Mexican border and sign up for the government for border patrol to protect the borders of the country that I love. You hear how serious I am."It's also quite clear that Simcox is motivated less by real concerns about border security than about the influx of Latinos into the United States:In January 2003, while on patrol with Civil Homeland Defense, Simcox was arrested by federal park rangers for illegally carrying a .45-caliber semi-automatic handgun in a national park. Also in Simcox's possession at the time of that arrest, according to police records, were a document entitled "Mission Plan," a police scanner, two walkie-talkies, and a toy figure of Wyatt Earp on horseback.

Two months later, in a speech to the California Coalition on Immigration Reform, a hate group whose leader, Barbara Coe, routinely refers to Mexicans as "savages," Simcox offered a dire warning to his audience. "Take heed of our weapons because we're going to defend our borders by any means necessary," he said. "There's something very fishy going on at the border. The Mexican army is driving American vehicles -- but carrying Chinese weapons. I have personally seen what I can only believe to be Chinese troops." Of illegal immigrants, Simcox added: "They're trashing their neighborhoods, refusing to assimilate, standing on street corners, jeering at little girls walking on their way to school."He also has been known to inflate his resume:"When I'm asked by reporters if I'm a racist, I tell them, 'Why don't you go ask my black ex-wife and my biracial children and the members of the racial diversity committee I chaired whether I'm a racist?'" he said at the October conference.Simcox, evidently, was never the chair of his school's diversity committee. Even more disturbing, however, is what comes next:"When they ask me, 'Well, what do you have to say to people who call you a racist?' I come back at them with, 'What do you have to say to people who call you a child molester?'" That's a strange rhetorical device given the accusations leveled at Simcox in the summer of 1998, when his 14-year-old daughter from his first marriage -- prior to his union with Dunbar -- came to live with him in Los Angeles. In separate interviews with the Intelligence Report, two of Simcox's former colleagues at Wildwood and his first ex-wife gave the same account. They said that Simcox helped his daughter get a job babysitting for a Wildwood School employee and that one night, Simcox's daughter showed up unexpectedly at her employer's house, visibly upset, alleging that her father had just attempted to sexually molest her. "He tried to molest our daughter when he was intoxicated," said Deborah Crews, Simcox's first ex-wife and the girl's mother. "When she ran out, he tried to say he was just giving her a leg massage and she got the wrong idea." Contacted by the Report, Simcox refused to answer four direct questions about the molestation allegations. "I would never answer those questions to you. You can't ask those questions," he said. "You're on a witch hunt and you're trying to discredit our movement, which is to secure the borders. ... My personal life has nothing to do with anything that goes on here." No charges were filed against Simcox, but Crews said she and her daughter immediately broke off all contact with him. "He's a drastic, chaotic, very dangerous guy," said Crews. "I'm surprised he hasn't shot anybody yet. I see him on TV and I have to turn if off, because it makes me sick to see him getting all this attention."If this is someone's idea of the leader of a "neighborhood watch," I'd be watching my neighborhood very closely indeed.

Antifascist
...So the steps are gradual. The para-military groups form, the government used the media to spread propaganda, "stairical" comments, then citizens advocate murder--sound familar?

Jews forced to scrub Anti-Nazi slogans from Austrian streets

Jews Forced To Carry Anti-Jewish Signs--this was "satirical."

Jewish Lawyer Carrying Self-Insulting Sign--"I will not complain to the police again." This was "satirical."


QUOTE
'Shoot illegals' comment earns host FCC complaint
Radio talker says suggestion to 'kill whoever crosses the border' satirical

April 8, 2006
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Arizona's attorney general and a U.S. federal attorney filed a complaint with the Federal Communication Commission yesterday against a Phoenix radio station and a fill-in talk show host over comments made last month suggesting the solution to the illegal immigration problem was to "randomly pick one night every week where we will kill whoever crosses the border."

In their letter to the FCC, Attorney General Terry Goddard and U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton criticized the March 8 broadcast by host Brian James on KFYI as "dangerous."

"This type of threatening and inciting speech is dangerous and totally irresponsible for anyone, particularly a licensed body using the public airways," Goddard and Charlton wrote. "We are deeply concerned that, given the intensifying conflict over immigration in Arizona, this speech may lead to violence. Tempers are short on both sides and the situation is highly volatile."

"At no time during this hour did Mr. James disavow violence or indicate he was joking," the letter claimed. The pair also urged the FCC to consider sanctions against the station.

According to a partial transcript of the program – KFYI did not preserve a tape of the broadcast, according to station manager Laurie Cantillo – James was taking suggestions from listeners for ways to end the influx of illegal aliens.

"What we'll do is randomly pick one night every week where we will kill whoever crosses the border," he said. "Step over there and you die. You get to decide whether it's your lucky night or not. I think that would be more fun."

James said he would be "happy to sit there with my high-powered rifle and my night scope" and shoot border crossers, adding the National Guard should be permitted to shoot illegal immigrants and receive "$100 a head." +
worldnetdaily.com article continues

Antifascist
David Neiwert is an expert on hate groups and he is noticing an upswing in "elimination" talk. I posted this article because hate speech is using the term "rats" to dehumanize illegal aliens. This is not the first time in history this has been done.
QUOTE
Immigration and eliminationism
Orcinus
by David Neiwert
Saturday, April 15, 2006

Those mass marches are having their effect: They're scaring the crap out of the nativists.

And they're fighting back in the usual, expected fashion ... by lying and making ugly but empty threats.

At least, we hope they're empty. Because what they're advocating, increasingly, is eliminating all 11 million illegal aliens in the United States. How they'll achieve that is something, however, they leave to our imaginations.

Recently a powerful Arizona legislator named Russell Pearce, a Republican from Mesa, recently uttered the following in response to the marches:

They're illegal and they have no right to be marching down our streets. They have no constitutional rights. They don't have First-, Fourth-, Sixth amendment rights. They're here illegally and they chose to be here illegally.

Pearce heads the state's House appropriations panel, has served as a judge, and was for many years a law-enforcement officer. And he really believes this?

As Blogs for Arizona explains, illegal aliens in fact have all kinds of rights under the constitution, including due-process rights, free-speech rights, search-and-seizure rights, and criminal-justice rights.

Of course, we hear the word "illegal" all the time in the nativists' arguments. "What part of 'illegal' don't you understand?" is one of the Minutemen's favorite T-shirt slogans.

To which the appropriate response is: "What part of 'bad law' don't you understand?"

The