rén
Tuesday, 12 February 2008, 10:01 am
I've enjoyed watching this watercooler discussion unfold. While this single test is not something to take seriously, nor do I believe much of the (we used to call it parlor psychology, but I think watercooler psychology works today -- who has parlors?) discussions about left brainers and right brainers is based in anything like "hard science" (Jack seems like he might lean towards that direction), but I do believe we can perceive something about ourselves and others that's worth the trouble, and certainly any effort to understand our minds in any serious way can't be self destructive unless we want it to be.
I think what's interesting is that we can learn to see in different ways, which implies to me we can learn to think in different ways. Thus, for each of us who has the interest, the possibility of becoming more mentally flexible.
I'm not real sure about this particular dancer image myself. But it certainly is a controversial one, and good for the watercooler discussions. I seem to be able to get my mind to "make" it reverse when I want it to, and I have a trick for that similar to what I've heard from others. It starts at the bottom and works from there. But I have a friend who does it from the top, can't do it from the bottom!
I like being able to see both the old woman and the young woman in the following at once. At first I couldn't, it's easy now:

I often wonder what the natives living on the beach really "saw" that time when the Santa Maria, the Niña and the Pinta emerged up from the horizon and came towards them.
What's wonderful to me is that the mind remains a never ending mystery to explore.