Jubal
Friday, 8 February 2008, 12:03 pm
QUOTE(POAC @ Friday, 8 February 2008, 12:20 pm)

strawman much?
You tell me.
anniefey said:
QUOTE
Tell me, how is Huckabee's vow to take America back for Christ any different from Osama Bin Laden's call for jihad to overthrow the Saudi royal family and take back his nation for Allah?
I take this to mean she sees no difference between Huckabee's vow and Osama's jihad. Now, I do believe Osama's jihad includes elements of large-scale violence. I haven't seen any indication that Huckabee's vow includes such elements of large-scale violence. That would be "different." So I responded:
QUOTE
You interpreted Huckabee's vow as a call for war?
In so doing, I was following annifey's format of expressing a statement as a question.
With me so far? OK, pressing on...
That's when soon2b threw in the dictionary definition of "jihad" as "relentless campaign against somebody or something." By this he was implying that "jihad" need not be violent. He apparently didn't comprehend that anniefey made specific reference to
Osama Bin Laden's call for jihad. So I pointed that out by, admittedly sarcastically, observing that his implication that "jihad" wasn't necessarily war was about as laughable as the administration's claim that waterboarding isn't torture, when applied to Osama bin Laden's notion of jihad.
That's when the name-calling started. Please note that my responses, while again sarcastic, remained on topic and didn't join in the
ad hominem festival.
In the interests of peace (and time), I'll restate.
I see at least one difference between Osama bin Laden's call for jihad and Huckabee's vow to take back America for Christ. Osama has in the past included massive violence, terrorism, and warfare in his concept of jihad. To the best of my knowledge, Huckabee hasn't included a call for massive violence, terrorism, and warfare in his vow to take back America for Christ. I see this as a significant distinction.
Better now?
I do apologize for the sarcasm, and for any confusion it may have caused among the board regulars, who of course are unfamiliar with sarcasm because they would never, ever stoop to such a vile, barbarous tactic.