I find it interesting to see the difference between Desired outcome and Expected outcomes.

I picked the Huck because he's such a clown.
Stand him up next to a real, credible human being and he just looks silly.

what?

who the hall are yoou people, and what did you do with my community of people of conscience? it wasn't even 90 days ago that everyone on this forum leaned toward kucinich as their desired candidate. I voted for hunter 'cause kucinich would wipe the floor with him.

this is a fantasy poll people, why would you vote for soomeone you didn't truly want running?

I'm backing kucinich (and voting for him in the primary) because I want to push the party as far in the progressive direction as possible. But I really think Edwards would be a better candidate.

A vegan president? Are you kidding me?

reminds me of louie singing about a wonderful world...

Kucinich would be my desired president. Edwards is my preferred candidate. There's a difference.

I never knew Kucinich was a vegan. I like him even more now!
This planet needs leaders like him -i.e. willing to consider consequences on MANY levels.... screw macho-ism. The world has had much too much of it! Time to progress...

I voted for Kucinich and Paul in this pole.
Kucinich = obvious. As for Paul, I keep coming back to his foreign/none interventionist policy... BUT, having read Sky's reason for voting for Huck', I vote to change my vote! Thanks.

If all things were equal, I'd wish for Kucinich.
But they aren't.

He's my Huckleberry

An Edwards/ Paul race wouldn't be all that bad.

Pretty good outcome so far.

how does the 7-3 proportion make you feel?

Seems like the one's that want change here expect (or want it) it to come from the dem side...

Speaking only for myself, Paul's idea of change is completely unacceptable,
and only slightly higher on the list than anything those other regressive schmucks might suggest.

considering karen's change of heart, make that a 7-2 ratio...

Not surprising here.