9/11 - the big cover-up?
Peter Tatchell
September 12, 2007 10:30 AM

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/peter_...ig_coverup.html

Six years after 9/11, the American public have still not been provided with a full and truthful account of the single greatest terror attack in US history.

What they got was a turkey. The 9/11 Commission was hamstrung by official obstruction. It never managed to ascertain the whole truth of what happened on September 11 2001.

The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were "set up to fail" and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation. They also confirm that they were denied access to the truth and misled by senior officials in the Pentagon and the federal aviation authority;
and that this obstruction and deception led them to contemplate slapping officials with criminal charges.

Despite the many public statements by 9/11 commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded, for lying to the 9/11 Commission.

From the outset, the commission seemed to be hobbled. It did not start work until over a year after the attacks. Even then, its terms of reference were suspiciously narrow, its powers of investigation curiously limited and its time-frame for producing a report unhelpfully short - barely a year to sift through millions of pages of evidence and to interview hundreds of key witnesses.

The final report did not examine key evidence, and neglected serious anomalies in the various accounts of what happened. The commissioners admit their report was incomplete and flawed, and that many questions about the terror attacks remain unanswered. Nevertheless, the 9/11 Commission was swiftly closed down on August 21 2004.

I do not believe in conspiracy theories. I prefer rigorous, evidence-based analysis that sifts through the known facts and utilises expert opinion to draw conclusions that stand up to critical scrutiny. In other words, I believe in everything the 9/11 Commission was not.

The failings of the official investigation have fuelled too many half-baked conspiracy theories. Some of the 9/11 "truth" groups promote speculative hypotheses, ignore innocent explanations, cite non-expert sources and jump to conclusions that are not proven by the known facts. They convert mere coincidence and circumstantial evidence into cast-iron proof. This is no way to debunk the obfuscations and evasions of the 9/11 report.

But even amid the hype, some of these 9/11 groups raise valid and important questions that were never even considered, let alone answered, by the official investigation. The American public has not been told the complete truth about the events of that fateful autumn morning six years ago.

What happened on 9/11 is fundamentally important in its own right. But equally important is the way the 9/11 cover-up signifies an absence of democratic, transparent and accountable government. Establishing the truth is, in part, about restoring honesty, trust and confidence in American politics.

There are dozens of 9/11 "truth" websites and campaign groups. I cannot vouch for the veracity or credibility of any of them. But what I can say is that as well as making plenty of seemingly outrageous claims; a few of them raise legitimate questions that demand answers.

Four of these well known "tell the truth" 9/11 websites are:

1) Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which includes academics and intellectuals from many disciplines.

2) 250+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' a website that cites over 250 pieces of evidence that allegedly contradict, or were omitted from, the 9/11 Commission report.

3) The 911 Truth Campaign that, as well as offering its own evidence and theories, includes links to more than 20 similar websites.

4) Patriots Question 9/11, perhaps the most plausible array of distinguished US citizens who question the official account of 9/11, including General Wesley Clark, former Nato commander in Europe, and seven members and staffers of the official 9/11 Commission, including the chair and vice chair. In all, this website documents the doubts of 110+ senior military, intelligence service, law enforcement and government officials; 200+ engineers and architects; 50+ pilots and aviation professionals; 150+ professors; 90+ entertainment and media people; and 190+ 9/11 survivors and family members. Although this is an impressive roll call, it doesn't necessarily mean that these expert professionals are right. Nevertheless, their scepticism of the official version of events is reason to pause and reflect.

More and more US citizens are critical of the official account. The respected Zogby polling organisation last week found that 51% of Americans want Congress to probe President Bush and Vice-President Cheney regarding the truth about the 9/11 attacks; 67% are also critical of the 9/11 Commission for not investigating the bizarre, unexplained collapse of the 47-storey World Trade Centre building 7 (WTC7). This building was not hit by any planes. Unlike WTC3, which was badly damaged by falling debris from the Twin Towers but which remained standing, WTC7 suffered minor damage but suddenly collapsed in a neat pile, as happens in a controlled demolition.

In a 2006 interview with anchorman Evan Soloman of CBC's Sunday programme, the vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, was reminded that the commission report failed to even mention the collapse of WTC7 or the suspicious hurried removal of the building debris from the site - before there could be a proper forensic investigation of what was a crime scene. Hamilton could only offer the lame excuse that the commissioners did not have "unlimited time" and could not be expected to answer "every question" the public asks.

There are many, many more strange unexplained facts concerning the events of 9/11. You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to be puzzled and want an explanation, or to be sceptical concerning the official version of events.

Six years on from those terrible events, the survivors, and the friends and families of those who died, deserve to know the truth. Is honesty and transparency concerning 9/11 too much to ask of the president and Congress?

What is needed is a new and truly independent commission of inquiry to sort coincidence and conjecture from fact, and to provide answers to the unsolved anomalies in the evidence available concerning the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. Unlike the often-stymied first investigation, this new commission should be granted wide-ranging subpoena powers and unfettered access to government files and officials. George Bush should be called to testify, without his minders at hand to brief and prompt him. America - and the world - has a right to know the truth.

Peter Tatchell is a human rights campaigner, and a member of the queer rights group OutRage! and the left wing of the Green party. He is the Green Party's parliamentary candidate for Oxford East.

His key political inspirations are Mahatma Gandhi, Sylvia Pankhurst, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X.

Born in Melbourne, Australia in 1952, he began campaigning for human rights in 1967, aged 15. His first campaign was against the death penalty, followed by campaigns in support of Aboriginal rights and in opposition to the draft and the Australian and US war against the people of Vietnam.

In 1969, on realising he was gay, the struggle for queer freedom became an increasing focus of his activism.

After moving to London in 1971, he became a leading activist in the Gay
Liberation Front (GLF), organising sit-ins at pubs that refused to serve “poofs” and protests against police harassment and the medical classification of homosexuality as an illness.

Two years later, in East Berlin, he was arrested and interrogated by the
secret police - the Stasi - after staging the first ever gay rights protest
in a communist country.

He stood as the Labour candidate in the 1983 Bermondsey byelection, but was defeated after some homophobic election campaigning.

In 1987, he launched the world's first organisation dedicated to
defending the human rights of people with HIV, the UK Aids Vigil
Organisation (UKAVO). In 1988, the UKAVO persuaded the World Health Minister's Summit on Aids to issue a declaration opposing government repression and discrimination against people with HIV.

A long-time anti-apartheid activist, his lobbying of the ANC in 1987 contributed to it renouncing homophobia and making its first public commitment to lesbian and gay human rights. Later, together with others, he helped persuade the ANC to include a ban on anti-gay discrimination in the post-apartheid constitution.

After playing a prominent role in the London chapter of the Aids activist group ACT UP, in 1990 he helped found the radical queer rights direct action movement OutRage!.

Most notoriously, in 1994 Peter Tatchell and OutRage! outed 10 Church of England bishops and called on them to "tell the truth" about their sexuality, accusing them of hypocrisy and homophobia for publicly supporting anti-gay policies, while privately having homosexual affairs. This led to him being denounced in parliament and the press as a "homosexual terrorist" and "public enemy number one".

Four years later, he interrupted the Archbishop of Canterbury's Easter
sermon in Canterbury Cathedral, condemning the archbishop, Dr George Carey's advocacy of discrimination against lesbians and gay men.

The following year, 1999, in central London, he and three OutRage! colleagues ambushed the motorcade of the President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, and made a citizen's arrest of the president on charges of torture and other human rights abuses.

He attempted another citizen's arrest of Mr Mugabe in Brussels in March 2001, which resulted in him being beaten unconscious by the president's bodyguards.

In 2002, he bought an unsuccessful legal action in the British courts for the arrest of the former US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, on charges of war crimes in Vietnam and Cambodia.

Peter Tatchell campaigns for the independence of the Western Sahara, Palestine and West Papua, and supports the struggles for democracy and human rights in Iran and Iraq. He opposes ID cards, nuclear weapons and energy and the erosion of civil liberties by draconian anti-terror laws. He advocates a single, comprehensive, all-inclusive Equal Rights Act to harmonise the uneven patchwork of equality legislation.

He has proposed an internationally-binding UN human rights convention, enforceable through both national courts and the world court; a permanent rapid-reaction UN peacekeeping force with authority to intervene to stop genocide and war crimes and global agreement to cut military spending by 10% to fund the eradication of hunger, disease, illiteracy, unemployment and homelessness.

PeterTatchell is the author of six books, including Democratic Defence - A Non-Nuclear Alternative (Heretic Books/GMP) and We Don't Want To March Straight - Masculinity, Queers & The Military (Cassell).

For more information about his human rights campaigns see www.petertatchell.net and Outrage

Its a blog section of the website where they chose a commentary from a couple of people each day. Its not something you'd find actually in the paper, but still, one of the editors did pick it. In general I think the British press is much more honest and willing to dig dirt on important issues.
If you like this section of their site, you might like the Mark Thomas articles. He has a long history of investigative journalism and used to have a good TV show about it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/st...2167909,00.html

oops.