Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Busting the OPEC trust
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Politics In General
Spud Demon
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070522/ap_on_...ngress_energy_1

QUOTE
House approves anti-OPEC bill

By JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer Tue May 22, 5:04 PM ET

WASHINGTON - Decrying near-record high gasoline prices, the House voted Tuesday to allow the government to sue OPEC over oil production quotas.

The White House objected, saying that might disrupt supplies and lead to even higher costs at the pump. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries is the cartel that accounts for 40 percent of the world's oil production.

"We don't have to stand by and watch OPEC dictate the price of gas," Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., the bill's chief sponsor, declared, reflecting the frustration lawmakers have felt over their inability to address people's worries about high summer fuel costs.

The measure passed 345-72. A similar bill awaits action in the Senate.

Separtely at a House hearing, lawmakers were told that crude oil prices have played a relatively minor role in the sharp increase in gasoline costs over the last three months, putting the blame on lower gasoline imports, refinery outages and continuing growth in demand from motorists.

Gasoline prices "may ease somewhat," Guy Caruso, chief of the Energy Department's statistical agency, told the House Energy and Commerce investigations subcommittee. But he said pressure on gas prices will remain strong "with the hurricane season approaching, continued tight refinery conditions, low gas inventories and increased demand for summer travel."

Nevertheless, the House felt it was important to take on OPEC, the major player in oil production. Member states of OPEC late last year cut production by 1.1 million barrels a day to counter what had been a buildup of world oil stocks.

Conyers accused the OPEC engaging in a "price fixing conspiracy" that has "unfairly driven up the price" of crude oil and, in turn gasoline.

His measure would change antitrust laws so that the Justice Department can sue OPEC member countries for price-fixing, and would remove the immunity given a sovereign state against such lawsuits.

But the White House said such suits could spawn retaliatory measures by oil-producing countries and "lead to oil supply disruptions and an escalation in the price of gasoline, natural gas, home heating oil."

The administration urged "diplomatic efforts ... rather than lawsuits in U.S. courts" to address global oil production. The White House said
President Bush would be advised to veto the measure if Congress passed it.

Rep. Steve Chabot (news, bio, voting record), R-Ohio, said he was "very disappointed" by the president's opposition. "If gasoline prices remain this high it is going to have a significant impact on the economy."


I still don't get it. Suppose we sue Venezuela in our own court and win. What's going to happen? Punitive import taxes? If it means Exxon offers less per barrel of Venezuelan oil than that of other countries, Venezuela will simply sell the oil to China instead, and we won't recover a dime.

Seize their assets? That would give incentive to Bahrain and other Arab nations to divest themselves now.
Abell9
QUOTE(Spud Demon @ Wednesday, 23 May 2007, 5:07 pm) [snapback]93984[/snapback]
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070522/ap_on_...ngress_energy_1
I still don't get it. Suppose we sue Venezuela in our own court and win. What's going to happen? Punitive import taxes? If it means Exxon offers less per barrel of Venezuelan oil than that of other countries, Venezuela will simply sell the oil to China instead, and we won't recover a dime.

Seize their assets? That would give incentive to Bahrain and other Arab nations to divest themselves now.


This whole thing is a mystery to me.
Jubal
It's a grandstand move, designed to get votes. Practical effect - zero.

That's what the Democrats do these days.
Libertas
Ridiculously stupid. Are they hoping to take the suit to the WTO? If so, OPEC may refuse, as the US recently did, and then the issue is in deadlock again. This is a diplomatic issue, not a legal one, because no court has jurisdiction over OPEC itself.

If legislators are so worried about the price of oil, maybe they ought to look in their own backyard, at the companies that are bleeding us dry while they make record profits (of course, that's assuming the oil lobby isn't ultimately behind this push, which they probably are). Exxon, I'm looking at you. If anyone is liable to be sued, it's them. In Venezuela, they don't put up with this shit--they threaten industry with nationalization. If only OUR government worked for the people instead of the oil companies...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.