Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Republicans prevented Clinton from doing legally what Bush is now doing illegally
OLD American Century / White Rose Society message boards > Political Discussion forums > Politics In General
sky of mind
IPB Image AMERICABLOG
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/09/go...n-push-for.html


Monday, September 04, 2006

GOP Congress blocked Clinton push for anti-terror legislation
by John in DC - 9/04/2006 11:10:00 AM


CNN, July 30, 1996

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the [Clinton] White House wants. Some they're not going to get." ....[Hatch] also said he had some problems with the president's proposals to expand wiretapping.


So Bill Clinton, rather than just breaking the law as Bush did (then again, perhaps this is why Bush broke the law - he knew from history that the Republicans controlling the congress would oppose his efforts to expand wiretapping), decided to go to the Republican congress in 1996 and ask them for increased authority to do more eavesdropping in order to stop the terrorists - stop September 11. Senior Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, one of the GOP's top picks for the Supreme Court and a GOP committee chair, objected.

The Republicans stopped President Clinton from getting all the tools he needed to stop the next September 11 - well, no, actually they opposed giving President Clinton all the tools he needed to stop the actual September 11. Could September 11 have been stopped if the GOP had given President Clinton the tools he requested to stop Osama and Mohammad Atta from killing 3,000 people in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington?

Maybe we need to ask the Republicans up for re-election why they wanted to appease the terrorists?

President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.


There's even an audio clip of President Clinton practically begging the Republicans to give him the tools he needed to stop Osama and the terrorists. Trent Lott said no. Orrin Hatch said no. Do these men really deserve to run the Congress during a time of war?



So, the NEXT time ANYONE says Clinton caused 9/11, or that Clinton was in any way soft on Terrorism, you give them this link.
Celticrebel
Very nice, good flyer material in the fight against the Republicans. I'm sure many people would be amazed to see thier party flops more on issues than a fish out of water.
Rousseau
Great link, thanks.

But imagine what would have happened if Bill had had the means to stop the "New Pearl Harbour" dead in its tracks. What would the PNAC and their GOP puppets have had to do then to convince the Nation to surrender their Rights and their Souls to them ? (Thats assuming they weren't all in prison on treason charges....)
sky of mind
QUOTE(Rousseau @ Tuesday, 5 September 2006, 4:23 am) [snapback]71552[/snapback]

Great link, thanks.

But imagine what would have happened if Bill had had the means to stop the "New Pearl Harbour" dead in its tracks. What would the PNAC and their GOP puppets have had to do then to convince the Nation to surrender their Rights and their Souls to them ? (Thats assuming they weren't all in prison on treason charges....)




Imagine it all never happened, and the middle east was a relatively stable region, and terrorists didn't consider the US their ultimate target, and huge poppy fields were not growing in Afghanistan, and nearly 3000 people were still with their families?


Can you imagine?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.