This guy named Maddox pretty much debunks any 9/11 conspiracy

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Look 5 posts down.

http://oldamericancentury.org/bb/index.php?showtopic=10524

Oops. My bad. I see its been done already (and I did look but somehow missed your post.)

OK Look, this guy and his anti-theory crap is as rediculous as some of the original consipracy theories.
He only adresses a hand full of questions, most of which are already understood by even the most avid tin foil hatter.

Still, many good solid questions remain unanswered. For instance, if the country was under attack, and no body knew for sure what was going on, how, many planes were involved, why didn't the secret service immediately remove the President from that elementry school to a safe place? Or, what really happened to WTC7? Or, how much of what was being planned did the administration know before it happened?

Yes, there are still remaining good valid question about 9/11, and don't let people like this anti-conspiracy fruit cake confuse the issue for a moment!

Agreed Sky.

The point is a proper investigation was not done. The new book out by Kean and Hamill says they were prevented from getting info they needed when they served on the 9/11 commission. It looks bad. It creates suspicion.

We deserve a no-holds-barred investigation.

And let's not overlook the obvious either. PNAC's "RAD" document was posted on the world wide web a year before 9/11, and noone has investigated PNAC members or their documents (in America that is, for there has been international investigations!). Does anyone know if PNAC was even mentioned in "9/11 Commission Report" or not?:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3249.htm
"...Members of PNAC are so self-assured they are advancing America's best interests that they publish policy papers specifically outlining their plans, plans that many fear may be laying the groundwork for a third world war. Their ideas are peculiarly atavistic, considering the friendly ties that have been forged between most of the major nations during the past ten years.

Their central policy document is entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD)," published on their website at http://newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf. It outlines a plan for American hegemony in the coming years, pinpointing "problem areas" of the world and suggesting regime change of unfavorable governments so that eventually the whole world will be unified under the banner of American democracy..."

No question this group was less than open about 9/11. Yes, there are lots ofd questions, none of which are helped by nonsense like Loose Change.

The "Loose Change" would NOT BE an issue if there were a truly open and honest investigation into ALL aspects and ALL questions from ALL corners concerning 9/11.

In other words, you don't like what loose change is saying? Let them fully investigate and officially prove it wrong!

The site is a joke site.

Lighten up.